A full study of Hebrews’ manuscript transmission, early papyri, major codices, scribal habits, and key variants within the Pauline tradition.
New Testament Textual Criticism: The Story of the Western Text
The Western text reveals how scribes expanded and paraphrased the New Testament, especially Acts, while earlier Alexandrian witnesses preserve the original wording.
Codex Zacynthius: A Palimpsest’s Tale in New Testament Textual Criticism
Codex Zacynthius preserves an early Lukan text beneath later reuse, offering a powerful witness to Luke’s stable transmission and documentary recovery.
The Textual Relationship Between the Pauline Epistles and the Acts of the Apostles
Acts supplies the historical framework of Paul’s mission, while the Pauline Epistles reveal its doctrinal depth, pastoral burden, and early textual transmission.
Evaluating the Contributions of Metzger and Aland to Textual Criticism
Metzger clarified textual judgment, and Aland strengthened documentary control, making both central to modern New Testament textual criticism.
The Apostolic Fathers and Their Impact on New Testament Textual Criticism
The Apostolic Fathers function as early indirect witnesses whose citations and allusions corroborate and sometimes illuminate New Testament textual variants.
The Relationship Between the Muratorian Canon and New Testament Textual Criticism
The Muratorian Canon supports New Testament textual criticism by confirming early collection, public reading, and controlled transmission of core apostolic books.
New Testament Textual Criticism: Evaluating the Coherence-Based Genealogical Method
A documentary evaluation of CBGM, affirming early Alexandrian primacy and the authority of second-century papyri in reconstructing the original text.
Unfolding the Mystery of the Codex Alexandrinus
Codex Alexandrinus is a fifth-century Greek Bible whose mixed New Testament text, corrections, and strong Revelation witness illuminate how Scripture was copied and stabilized.
The Role of Origen in New Testament Textual Criticism
Origen’s massive citations and explicit notice of variant readings make him a central patristic witness, best used alongside early manuscripts.

