Islam: Child Brides as Young as Nine

Please Support the Bible Translation Work of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV)

$5.00

Muhammad And Aisha: The Eternal Legal Template

Muhammad stands as the perfect example for all Muslims in every aspect of life, including marriage. The Quran commands believers to follow his Sunnah without question, declaring in Surah 33:21 that he is uswa hasana, an excellent pattern of conduct. In Surah after Surah, the Quran reinforces that obedience to Allah is inseparable from obedience to the Messenger. In Shariah, what Muhammad did is not merely allowed; it is the model that shapes law for all generations.

Islamic tradition records that Muhammad married Aisha when she was six years old and consummated the marriage when she was nine. This union appears in the most authentic hadith collections, graded sahih by Muslim scholars themselves. In Sahih al-Bukhari, Aisha narrates that “The Prophet engaged me when I was a girl of six years,” that she was playing with her friends when her mother suddenly took her, prepared her, and handed her to Muhammad, and that at that moment “I was a girl of nine years of age.” Other narrations state that she was still playing with dolls and that Muhammad died when she was eighteen. Sahih Muslim repeats the same ages and core details. These reports come through chains of transmission that Islamic scholarship itself accepts as unbreakable.

This marriage serves as the foundational template for Shariah rulings on child marriage. Classical jurists from all four Sunni schools—Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi‘i, and Hanbali—cite Muhammad’s example to permit fathers to contract marriages for minor daughters without a fixed age limit. The Hanafi school allows consummation upon physical maturity, defined loosely as the onset of menstruation or the ability to bear intercourse. The Shafi‘i school explicitly treats nine as the age at which consummation is permissible if the girl can physically endure it. Shia jurisprudence follows the same prophetic model, with their imams upholding Muhammad’s actions as guiding precedent.

In all contexts, fatwas and legal opinions appeal directly to Aisha’s marriage. Traditional authorities affirm that this union establishes the permissibility of consummation with a nine-year-old and declare such consummation obligatory sunnah. To do so would be to accuse the Prophet himself of wrongdoing. Since Muhammad is the “seal of the prophets,” his actions abrogate earlier practices and fix the norm. No Muslim authority can override his Sunnah without committing bid‘ah, innovation, which the hadith warn leads to hellfire.

The implications reach far beyond the seventh century. Muhammad’s marriage normalizes adult men taking child brides as a religious merit. Parents who arrange such unions believe they are following the Prophet’s path and earning Allah’s favor. Daughters become bargaining chips in alliances, debts, or tribal peace deals. The template embeds the sexual use of children into Shariah as something praiseworthy rather than perverse. Modern apologists who claim Aisha was older rely on weak and isolated reports that classical scholars rejected. Authorities such as Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani in Fath al-Bari and al-Nawawi in their commentaries defend the traditional ages as accurate and honorable.

Muhammad’s other marriages—to widows, to captives of war, to relatives—do nothing to soften this. They reinforce his absolute authority over female sexuality from cradle to grave. His marriage to Aisha is the centerpiece of that authority. Because his life is the measure of righteousness in Islam, every child bride in Islamic history, and every child bride today justified in his name, traces her suffering directly back to that bedroom in Medina. Shariah codifies his personal desires as divine law and makes criticism of child marriage equivalent to criticizing the Prophet himself. In a system that punishes blasphemy and apostasy with death, this template stands practically unassailable.

Quranic And Hadith Permissions for Marriage to Prepubescent Girls

The Quran provides the textual foundation for child marriage in Surah 65:4, which prescribes a waiting period for divorced females who have not menstruated: “And those who no longer expect menstruation among your women—their waiting period is three months; and also for those who have not menstruated.” Classical tafsir works consistently interpret “those who have not menstruated” as prepubescent girls.

Al-Tabari explains that this verse applies to young girls married before puberty, requiring a three-month iddah to ensure no pregnancy after divorce. Ibn Kathir states that Allah legislates for little girls here because marriage to them is permissible; otherwise, the ruling would have no audience. Al-Qurtubi adds that the verse proves intercourse with immature girls is allowed, because a waiting period for those who have never menstruated makes no sense unless sexual relations have taken place.

Hadith collections reinforce and flesh out these permissions. Bukhari records Muhammad saying that when a man’s daughter reaches puberty, he has the right to marry her off. Other narrations in collections such as Abu Dawud and an-Nasa’i discuss signs of maturity—such as a first menstruation or nocturnal emission—as markers of full marital capacity, but none of them forbid contracting a marriage before these signs appear. Some reports record Aisha praising girls who marry young and criticizing families who leave daughters unmarried when suitors are available.

The juristic manuals of Shariah turn these texts into detailed rules. Maliki jurisprudence permits guardians to compel marriage on virgin daughters of any age, citing hadith where Muhammad approved marriage contracts without consulting the girl. The doctrine of ijbar gives fathers the power to impose unions their daughters may not want. The Shafi‘i manual Reliance of the Traveller states that a guardian may contract marriage for a virgin daughter without her consent, and that consummation takes place when she can “bear” intercourse, understood practically at nine. Hanafi works such as Al-Hidayah allow a father to marry off a minor daughter in a way that binds her, with no ability to object later. Hanbali texts speak in similar terms.

Modern codifications reflect the same assumptions. The Ottoman Majalla and later family-law codes in some Muslim states are built on these fiqh rulings. In all countries, religious edicts have defended the permissibility of marrying prepubescent girls by pointing directly to Quran 65:4 and the Aisha narrations. Even where secular pressure has pushed governments to announce higher minimum ages, “exceptions” are always granted under Shariah for those who claim religious justification. The legal reality remains: if a guardian and a husband agree, and if the girl’s body can survive intercourse, Shariah considers the union legitimate.

These permissions create a system where girls hold no genuine agency. Fathers sign contracts even for infants, securing future husbands with dowries and mutual promises. Consummation is delayed only until the husband decides the girl’s body can tolerate penetration, not until she is emotionally or cognitively ready. The Quran and hadith frame this as mercy that protects girls from supposed “spinsterhood.” In real life, it strips them of childhood and turns playgrounds into bridal chambers, replacing dolls with babies and schoolbooks with cooking pots.

The Myth of “Consent” and the Reality of Contracted Childhood Rape

Islamic apologists often claim that child brides consent, or that early marriage brings girls protection and honor. They repeat the slogan that “Islam prohibits forced marriage,” pointing to scattered hadith where Muhammad annulled a union after a girl complained. This myth falls apart when weighed against the full structure of Shariah and the brutal facts on the ground.

A six-year-old cannot consent to marriage with a man in his fifties. A nine-year-old cannot give informed approval to sex, pregnancy, and childbirth. Aisha’s own words in the hadith paint a picture of play, not desire; of being pulled away from her friends and toys without understanding, not of a mature decision. Shariah’s doctrine of wilayah gives guardians absolute control over minors. In all rulings, the daughter’s opinion carries no legal weight. In the Hanbali and Maliki schools, virgins are married off without even being asked. Even in more “lenient” interpretations, the girl’s silence is counted as consent because modesty supposedly prevents her from speaking.

The reality this produces is legalized rape. Consummation involves an adult man forcing himself on a child’s body. Tearing, bleeding, and long-term damage are common. Medical reports from international organizations and clinics in affected regions describe vaginal ruptures in nine-year-old brides, fistulas from prolonged obstructed labor, and girls who die from internal bleeding after “wedding nights.” The world saw cases like the twelve-year-old Yemeni girl Fawziya who died of hemorrhaging after her husband raped her; she is one name among countless nameless others.

Shariah does not call any of this rape. It calls it nikah, valid marriage. As long as a contract exists and a guardian signed it, the husband faces no punishment for what he does between the sheets. The girl is the one who endures the pain, humiliation, and possible death. In Shia contexts, temporary mut‘ah marriages exacerbate the abuse, allowing men to contract “marriage” with minors for hours or days, paying the father and walking away afterward. The paper agreement transforms predation into ritual and shields the man behind religious vocabulary.

Psychologically, the damage is lifelong. Girls learn early that their bodies belong to men and that saying no is a sin. Refusal risks beatings, divorce, or being returned in disgrace to parents who may blame them. Fear of dishonor and hellfire works as effectively as chains. Many victims dissociate to survive, internalizing submission as piety. Over time, some become the very mothers who arrange the same horror for their daughters, repeating the cycle under the banner of Islamic faithfulness.

From the standpoint of Jehovah’s Word, this is sheer wickedness. Scripture commands husbands to love their wives as Christ loves the congregation, to honor them as co-heirs of the gift of life. Children are presented as blessings to be protected, not as sexual offerings. The Lord Jesus warned that causing little ones to stumble invites terrifying judgment. Shariah’s structure, built on Muhammad’s example and these texts, does the opposite. It authorizes a system where contracted childhood rape is baptized as obedience to God.

Physical and Psychological Devastation

Child marriage inflicts damage that reaches into every part of a girl’s life and into the next generation.

Physically, immature pelvises cannot safely accommodate adult penetration or childbirth. The bones are narrow, the tissues delicate, the hormonal systems unstable. When a grown man forces intercourse, the result is tearing, hemorrhage, and infections that scar reproductive organs. When pregnancy occurs, labor may last for days, culminating in uterine rupture or fistula. Fistulas leave girls incontinent, leaking urine or feces continuously. They are often cast out by husbands and families who view them as filthy. Many girls simply die from complications their bodies were never meant to endure at that age.

Global health organizations have documented tens of thousands of annual deaths from pregnancy and childbirth in girls under fifteen. Stunted growth, malnutrition, and anemia are common, because child mothers are still growing themselves while also trying to sustain a fetus. Early sexual activity also increases the risk of sexually transmitted infections, including HIV, especially where husbands have multiple partners. Cervical cancer rates rise with early and frequent intercourse. A child turned into a wife becomes a medical casualty.

Psychologically, the trauma is acute and enduring. Depression, anxiety, nightmares, and symptoms that fit modern understandings of post-traumatic stress disorder appear again and again in studies of child brides. Girls lose schooling, friendships, and any sense of control over their lives. Their “world” shrinks to a house and a man. Many contemplate or attempt suicide. Cases from Pakistan, Afghanistan, and other countries document child brides hanging themselves, ingesting poison, or setting themselves on fire to escape marriages arranged in the name of Islam.

The damage spreads into the next generation. Children born to traumatized young mothers often have low birth weight, developmental problems, and emotional difficulties. A woman treated as property from childhood finds it harder to form secure attachments; her wounds bleed into her parenting. Communities saturated with child marriage end up with cycles of poverty, illiteracy, and domestic violence. Economies stagnate as half the population is kept from education and productive work.

Shariah clerics who praise early marriage as a Sunnah and a safeguard against immorality never stand in the hospital wards where little girls bleed out. They do not watch the funerals of twelve-year-olds buried as “wives,” or sit with thirteen-year-olds whose bodies are torn and whose spirits are shattered. They recite hadith about the virtues of following Aisha’s example while ignoring the wreckage that this “example” produces.

Persistence Across Muslim-Majority Countries and Western Denial

Child marriage flourishes wherever Shariah’s texts and precedents are taken seriously and not openly rejected. Statistics vary by country, but the pattern is unmistakable.

In Yemen, a significant percentage of girls are married before fifteen. In Niger and neighboring regions with strong Islamic influence, well over half of girls marry before eighteen, with many unions occurring much earlier. Afghanistan under Taliban influence has repeatedly seen marriage ages pushed down toward puberty and below. Pakistan’s Council of Islamic Ideology has publicly opposed attempts to set higher minimum ages, arguing that to forbid what Muhammad practiced is un-Islamic. Religious figures in Saudi Arabia have defended marriages to girls as young as eight. Drafts of laws in Iraq based on Ja‘fari Shia jurisprudence have allowed marriage at nine. In countries like Bangladesh, Indonesia, and Malaysia, legislators announce higher age limits on paper but then carve out religious exceptions that judges routinely grant.

Enforcement is inconsistent, but the scriptures and rulings do not change. Iran under the Islamic Revolution lowered the legal marriage age to match classical Shariah norms and has only partially raised it under pressure, while courts still approve exceptions. Sudan criminalizes marriage only below puberty and defines puberty according to traditional criteria, leaving the door open. Clerics in Egypt and elsewhere defend the practice on television, quoting Quran and hadith to rebuke critics and insist that early marriage is part of Islam.

Western denial enables this persistence. United Nations reports condemn “child marriage” as a human rights abuse but refuse to name Islam and Shariah as central sources wherever these dominate. Western feminists write entire books attacking biblical patriarchy while ignoring Aisha’s age and Quran 65:4. Media outlets speak vaguely of “cultural practices” instead of religious law. European courts recognize Shariah marriages involving minors in the name of religious freedom and multiculturalism. American and European universities invite speakers who justify early marriage as historical context and accuse critics of “Islamophobia.”

Migration brings the pattern into Western cities. Police in the United Kingdom have recorded thousands of forced or underage marriages among certain immigrant communities. Cases in Germany, Sweden, Canada, and the United States show imams performing nikah for minors off the civil record. Schools quietly encounter pregnant twelve-year-olds whose “husbands” are much older relatives. Governments and agencies hesitate to intervene for fear of being labeled racist or anti-Muslim.

All of this proves that Shariah’s texts override modern slogans. Child marriage continues because Muhammad’s example and the Quranic and juristic framework that enshrined it have never been repudiated within mainstream Islam. As long as Muhammad’s consummation with a nine-year-old is praised rather than confessed as sin, and as long as Quran 65:4 and the classical rulings stand untouched, child brides remain, in the eyes of many, Allah’s command.

Western denial accelerates the brutality. By refusing to name the real source, politicians and church leaders sacrifice girls on the altar of multiculturalism and cowardice. From a Christian perspective, faithfulness to Jehovah and love for neighbor demand the opposite: clear exposure of the system that does this to children, bold proclamation of the Gospel of Jesus Christ as the only true rescue, and unwavering defense of the smallest and weakest whom Shariah turns into prey.

is-the-quran-the-word-of-god UNDERSTANDING ISLAM AND TERRORISM THE GUIDE TO ANSWERING ISLAM.png

You May Also Enjoy

Muhammad – Revenge and Ethnic Cleansing: Banu Qaynuqa and the First Jewish Expulsion (625 C.E.)

About the Author

EDWARD D. ANDREWS (AS in Criminal Justice, BS in Religion, MA in Biblical Studies, and MDiv in Theology) is CEO and President of Christian Publishing House. He has authored over 220+ books. In addition, Andrews is the Chief Translator of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV).

CLICK LINKED IMAGE TO VISIT ONLINE STORE

CLICK TO SCROLL THROUGH OUR BOOKS

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress.com.

Up ↑

Discover more from Updated American Standard Version

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading