
Please Support the Bible Translation Work of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV)
$5.00
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Erastus Named in the New Testament Record
Erastus enters the New Testament not as a shadowy name in a list, but as a recognizable man whose service to Christ intersected with public life in one of the most strategically placed cities of the Roman world. Corinth sat on the narrow isthmus between northern and southern Greece, commanding the traffic that moved goods and people between the Aegean and Adriatic. In such a place, municipal offices mattered, public works were visible, and reputations were forged in stone and in spending. When Paul writes from Corinth and includes greetings from Erastus, he does not present him as a curiosity, but as a brother whose identity was publicly intelligible: “Erastus, the city treasurer, and our brother Quartus greet you.” (Romans 16:23)

That single line matters for historical reasons and for pastoral reasons. Historically, it anchors a named Christian to a defined civic post. Pastorally, it shows the congregation’s reach into ordinary social structures without being absorbed by them. Christianity did not require a man to abandon lawful employment or civic responsibility; it required him to abandon sin, idolatry, and self-rule, and to live under Christ’s lordship in every sphere.
Erastus also appears in Paul’s traveling ministry orbit. During the third missionary tour, Paul “sent to Macedonia two of those ministering to him, Timothy and Erastus.” (Acts 19:22) Later, when Paul is near the end of his course and gives personal notes that read like a ledger of faithful coworkers, he writes: “Erastus stayed in Corinth.” (2 Timothy 4:20) Put together, the texts present a coherent profile: Erastus was known to Paul, entrusted with tasks, connected to Corinth, and remembered as someone who remained there.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Paul’s Third Missionary Tour and the Trusted Man Sent to Macedonia
Acts places Paul in Ephesus for an extended period during the third missionary tour. The context includes intense gospel advance, deep instruction, and public upheaval. In that setting Paul sends Timothy and Erastus ahead to Macedonia. The language identifies them as men “ministering” to Paul, not in a merely practical sense but as coworkers in the gospel labor that involved teaching, strengthening congregations, and coordinating the movement of the mission.
This detail is easily overlooked, but it is a kind of character testimony. Paul did not dispatch unstable men into sensitive work. Macedonia included established congregations that needed strengthening and also new opportunities that needed wise judgment. Erastus was the sort of man Paul could send. That is significant when set beside Romans 16:23. A man with civic responsibility in Corinth still participated in demanding gospel work. The early congregations did not operate as detached, private spiritual clubs; they were communities of disciples whose members could be artisans, merchants, household managers, and, in some cases, officials.
![]() |
![]() |
Erastus and Corinth in Romans and Second Timothy
Romans 16:23 fits naturally with the accepted setting that Paul wrote Romans from Corinth near the close of the third missionary tour, before he traveled to Jerusalem with the collection for the holy ones in Judea. The greetings at the end of Romans read like a snapshot of Paul’s circle at that moment, including Gaius as host, Quartus as “brother,” and Erastus identified by his civic function. The simplest reading of the text is that Erastus was in Corinth at the time of writing and was known in Corinth as an official whose work touched the city’s finances.
Second Timothy 4:20, written in a different season and under very different pressures, also places Erastus in Corinth. Paul’s statement is plain: Erastus stayed there. This does not reduce Erastus to a stationary figure; it locates him. The connection between Erastus and Corinth is repeated across letters and across time. Acts adds that Erastus was among Paul’s ministering coworkers. The lines converge: coworker, Corinthian link, and civic office.
The Office Called “City Treasurer” in a Roman Colony
Romans 16:23 calls Erastus “the city treasurer.” Paul wrote to Rome in Greek, and the term he uses communicates a public role that involved management of municipal resources. In the civic structure of Roman Corinth, a colony refounded under Roman authority, Latin civic titles existed alongside Greek descriptions that made sense to a broader audience. A “city treasurer” was not a vague compliment; it was a functional role tied to the city’s administration, accounting, and oversight of funds.
In the ancient world, titles can overlap in function even when the vocabulary differs. One language may name the financial aspect of an office while another emphasizes the honor or the public works responsibility tied to it. Moreover, municipal careers often involved successive offices. A man could serve in one capacity and later in another, especially if he had wealth, patronage connections, and a public reputation.
The New Testament does not try to impress by using technical Latin. It uses intelligible description. Paul is not trying to give a curriculum vitae; he is identifying a brother in Christ whose public role would be understood as weight-bearing and recognized in Corinth.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Corinth Pavement Inscription and Its Public Setting
In Corinth, archaeology has uncovered an inscribed paving block from a stone-paved area near the theater. The inscription is in Latin and records a benefaction by a man named Erastus in connection with an aedileship. A commonly cited reconstruction and reading of the text is: “ERASTVS PRO AEDILITATE S P STRAVIT,” which is typically rendered in English as a statement that Erastus, in return for his aedileship, laid the pavement at his own expense.
The importance of this kind of inscription is straightforward. Public works in Roman cities were commonly funded through elite benefaction. Offices could involve expected generosity, and paving streets, improving public spaces, and maintaining civic amenities were ways a magistrate displayed honor, gratitude, and public spirit. An inscription naming the donor served as permanent memory, a civic receipt, and a social signal.
The theater area in Corinth was not a quiet corner. It was a public spine of the city. A paving inscription there functioned like a billboard carved into the street itself. It linked the name Erastus with a visible, durable project in the heart of Corinth’s public life.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Aedile and Treasurer: Complementary Civic Responsibilities
Some have tried to set Romans 16:23 against the pavement inscription by treating “city treasurer” and “aedile” as mutually exclusive roles. That is an unnecessarily rigid approach to ancient civic reality. First, language matters. Paul writes in Greek with a descriptive label. The inscription uses a Latin office title. Second, offices can be sequential. A man can hold a financial post and later an office tied more directly to public works and civic oversight. Third, duties can overlap. An aedile’s responsibilities in many Roman contexts included supervision of public buildings, markets, and games, and such work inevitably involved money, contracts, and municipal organization.
The key question is not whether two terms are identical at the lexical level. The key question is whether the combined evidence places a man named Erastus, holding real public responsibility in Corinth, in the right period, and in a way that matches what Paul says. Corinth was not a village. The existence of another Erastus in the same city, in the same broad period, holding civic office, is not impossible, but it is a heavier claim than some acknowledge. Names vary in frequency from place to place, and the presence of a named official in Corinth with the same name Paul links to Corinth is precisely the sort of convergence that historical investigation recognizes as meaningful.
This also fits the way early Christianity moved through networks. A civic official with resources and connections could host, assist, travel, and serve in ways that complemented the work of men like Paul who labored tirelessly across regions. The gospel took root among the poor and the working classes, and it also reached some with means and public recognition. Paul himself observes that not many were wise or powerful by worldly standards, but he never says none were. The presence of Erastus harmonizes with that reality.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
What Erastus Reveals About Corinthian Christianity
Corinthian society was layered. It included Roman colonists, Greeks, freedmen, merchants, artisans, and a complex blend of local and imperial identities. The congregation in Corinth reflected this. From the beginning, Christianity confronted Corinth’s pride, immorality, and factionalism with the holiness of Jehovah and the lordship of Jesus Christ. Yet it also formed a real community that gathered in homes, shared meals, cared for one another, and proclaimed the gospel publicly.
Erastus helps us see the congregation in sharper relief. He was not merely a name at the bottom of a letter. He was a brother whose public identity did not evaporate at baptism. Instead, his public position became another arena where he lived as a disciple. Civic power did not make him spiritually superior. If anything, it raised the moral demand. The same Spirit-inspired Word that calls the laborer to honest work also calls the official to honest administration. The gospel does not flatten lawful distinctions by envy; it levels sinners at the foot of the cross and then builds holy ones into a new humanity that obeys Christ.
Erastus also challenges a shallow picture of early Christianity as either purely underground or purely impoverished. The congregation often met quietly for safety and order, but it was not invisible. The gospel spread through households, trades, friendships, and public life. A city treasurer greeting the believers in Rome is the kind of detail that rings with the sound of real history.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Strength of the Corroboration and the Limits of What We Claim
When evidence converges, it deserves to be stated plainly. Paul names an Erastus connected to Corinth and identifies him with civic responsibility. Acts names an Erastus who ministers to Paul and is sent on mission errands. Second Timothy names an Erastus located in Corinth. Archaeology in Corinth preserves a public inscription naming an Erastus associated with municipal office and public works in the same general era.
This is not the language of myth. It is the texture of life: names, offices, travel, places, and the kind of public memorials cities used. The New Testament writers speak with the calm precision of men reporting what happened, not inventing what might impress. At the same time, responsible handling of evidence refuses exaggeration. The inscription does not explicitly say “the Christian Erastus.” It does not quote Paul. It does not explain Erastus’s faith. It does what civic inscriptions do: it records a benefaction and an office. The New Testament does what Scripture does: it places a brother in Christ in real time and space. The combined picture is historically weighty without being forced.
Erastus, then, stands as a reminder that the gospel entered Corinth not as a private philosophy but as the truth of Jehovah proclaimed through His Son, producing disciples who lived faithfully in the middle of the city’s roads, markets, and magistracies.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |

























Leave a Reply