Among all the early Christian writers after the apostles, few have exercised as wide and as controversial an influence as Origen of Alexandria. He was brilliant, industrious, and utterly convinced that the Bible is the inspired Word of God. He labored over the Hebrew and Greek texts, produced massive commentaries, preached countless homilies, and trained generations of students. At the same time, he stood firmly within the Alexandrian tradition of allegorical interpretation, convinced that many of Scripture’s deepest meanings lie beneath the literal wording.

Because of this, Origen’s legacy is complex. On the one hand, his work helped shape Christian exegesis and theology for more than a millennium. On the other, his speculative tendencies and allegorical method led him into serious doctrinal errors and set patterns that later interpreters had to correct. To understand the rise of allegory in Christian history—and the need for a return to the historical-grammatical method—it is essential to look carefully at Origen’s life, his approach to Scripture, and his long-term influence.

---

Origen’s Life and Scholarship

Early Years in Alexandria

Origen was born in Alexandria around the end of the second century, into a Christian family that took discipleship seriously. His father, Leonides, taught him the Scriptures from childhood, reportedly having him memorize large portions of the Bible. The boy asked probing questions about the text, and Leonides rejoiced in his son’s hunger for the Word.

When persecution arose under the emperor Septimius Severus, Leonides was arrested for his faith and eventually executed. Origen, still a teenager, longed to share his father’s martyrdom, but his mother hid his clothes to prevent him from leaving the house. The memory of his father’s steadfastness and his own frustrated desire to die for Christ left a deep mark on him. It strengthened his conviction that the Christian life demands total consecration.

With his father gone, Origen’s family struggled financially. Yet his intellectual abilities were so evident that he soon found a place at the Alexandrian catechetical school, at first as a student and then as a teacher. By his late teens or early twenties, he was in effect leading the school, instructing converts and preparing believers to stand under persecution.

Ascetic Zeal and Scholarly Discipline

Origen embraced a rigorous ascetic lifestyle. He slept little, fasted often, walked barefoot, and avoided meat and wine. He renounced worldly wealth and devoted himself to study, teaching, and prayer. Some ancient reports suggest that he took extreme measures to avoid sexual temptation, though later writers debated the accuracy and wisdom of these accounts. What is certain is that he viewed the body with suspicion, influenced by the ascetic tendencies of his age and by philosophical ideas that valued the spiritual over the material.

At the same time, Origen poured himself into scholarship. He studied Hebrew to engage more directly with the Old Testament. He immersed himself in Greek literature, philosophy, and rhetoric, believing that these tools could be turned to service in understanding and defending Scripture. His classroom lectures drew large audiences, including future leaders of the church.

The Hexapla and Textual Labor

One of Origen’s most remarkable projects was the Hexapla, a massive multi-column comparison of the Old Testament text. In parallel columns he placed the Hebrew consonantal text, a transliteration into Greek letters, and several Greek translations, including the Septuagint and other versions then in circulation. His goal was to provide a tool for studying the precise wording of the Old Testament and for answering Jewish and pagan critics who accused Christians of misquoting Scripture.

Although the original Hexapla has not survived, later writers drew heavily from it. This monumental work shows Origen’s conviction that every word of Scripture matters. He did not treat the Bible as a mere springboard for spiritual reflections; he believed that its language, down to individual syllables, carried meaning from Jehovah.

In this, he anticipated later textual scholarship that seeks to recover the most accurate possible Hebrew and Greek text. Yet he combined this careful attention to wording with interpretive principles that often moved far beyond the literal sense.

Conflict, Ordination, and Final Sufferings

Origen’s prominence in Alexandria eventually led to conflict with his bishop, Demetrius. During a visit to Caesarea in Palestine, Origen had been invited to preach while still technically a layman, which Demetrius viewed as an overreach. Later, Origen was ordained as a presbyter in Caesarea, a move that further angered Demetrius, who felt his authority had been bypassed.

The dispute ended with Origen leaving Alexandria for good and establishing a new center of teaching in Caesarea. There he continued his exegetical and theological work, training students and producing commentaries.

In his later years, under the Decian persecution, Origen was arrested and subjected to harsh treatment—torture, chains, and confinement. Though he was eventually released, the physical damage contributed to his death a few years later. He died not technically as a martyr but as a confessor whose body had been broken for his allegiance to Christ.

Throughout his life, Origen remained convinced that Scripture is God-breathed and that Christ is the eternal Son who became man for our salvation. Yet the way he interpreted the Bible—shaped by Alexandrian traditions and philosophical influences—left a complicated legacy that must be evaluated carefully.

---

The Alexandrian Method in Practice

Scripture With “Body, Soul, and Spirit”

Origen inherited and refined a distinctive Alexandrian approach to Scripture. He taught that the Bible, like a human being, has a body, soul, and spirit. The “body” of Scripture is the literal, historical sense—the events and instructions as they appear. The “soul” is the moral or psychological sense, which guides ethical behavior and inner transformation. The “spirit” is the highest level, revealing heavenly mysteries and spiritual truths often hidden beneath the surface.

In Origen’s view, Jehovah intentionally included what he called “stumbling blocks” in the literal text—details that seem odd, impossible, or unworthy of God—so that readers would be driven to seek the deeper spiritual meaning. When narratives raised difficulties, he did not first ask whether his understanding of the literal sense needed refinement; he often concluded that the Spirit meant these difficulties as clues pointing beyond the historical level.

This threefold scheme allowed Origen to find Christ and spiritual lessons in almost every detail of Scripture. He argued that even passages that appear trivial on the surface have profound significance when interpreted allegorically.

Allegory in Old Testament Interpretation

Nowhere is Origen’s method more evident than in his handling of the Old Testament. He affirmed that the events of Israel’s history were real, but he also believed that their primary value lay in the spiritual truths they symbolized.

Israel’s exodus from Egypt became a picture of the soul’s liberation from slavery to sin and ignorance. The crossing of the Red Sea symbolized baptism. The wilderness wanderings depicted the Christian’s struggles with temptation. The conquest of Canaan represented the believer’s warfare against spiritual enemies within and without.

Laws about clean and unclean animals, sacrificial regulations, and ritual details were treated less as concrete instructions for ancient Israel and more as symbolic lessons about virtues and vices. For example, the command not to eat certain animals might be said to warn believers against certain types of morally unclean behavior or false teaching.

The Song of Songs, for Origen, was not primarily poetry about human marital love; it was an extended allegory of the love between Christ and the church or between the Logos and the individual soul. Every phrase—eyes like doves, a garden enclosed, spices and perfumes—became a symbol of spiritual realities: virtues, stages of contemplation, or aspects of Christ’s relationship to believers.

While the New Testament itself sometimes uses typology, grounded in real historical events that foreshadow Christ, Origen’s use of allegory frequently went beyond this. Typology builds on historical meaning; allegory, in his hands, tended to overshadow or even bypass it.

Allegory in Gospel and Epistle Exegesis

Origen also applied allegorical methods to the New Testament. In parables, miracles, and narratives of Christ’s life, he sought hidden meanings behind the plain story.

The Good Samaritan, for instance, was interpreted in detail: the man who fell among thieves represented Adam or humanity; Jerusalem symbolized heaven; Jericho symbolized the world; the priest and Levite stood for the Law and the prophets; the Samaritan represented Christ; the inn stood for the church; the two coins symbolized the two Testaments or the two chief commandments.

While such interpretations can be imaginative and sometimes edifying as meditations, they often lack firm grounding in the text. The parable’s central message about love for neighbor and mercy toward the wounded can be obscured by the multiplicity of symbolic details.

Origen sometimes handled difficult passages in the epistles in similar ways. Instead of wrestling with the historical context, the flow of argument, and the precise meaning of words, he would read them as symbolic statements about the soul’s progress, the stages of spiritual knowledge, or cosmic realities beyond the visible world.

This does not mean that Origen ignored grammar or context entirely. His commentaries often begin with literal observations and then move to spiritual interpretations. But in the end, the allegorical level frequently dominates, becoming the real treasure he believed the Spirit intended for mature readers.

---

The Strengths and Weaknesses of Allegory

Positive Intentions Behind Origen’s Method

To evaluate Origen fairly, we must recognize the positive intentions that shaped his allegorical approach. He never treated Scripture as a dead letter. He believed that Jehovah speaks to His people in every generation through the written Word and that believers must seek the Spirit-given meaning, not merely the outward form.

His method reflects a deep conviction about the unity of Scripture. By finding spiritual connections between Old Testament events and New Testament realities, Origen emphasized that the entire Bible points to Christ and to God’s saving purpose. He refused to treat the Old Testament as a mere record of ancient customs with no relevance for Christians.

Origen also desired to protect the character of God. When he confronted passages that, taken literally, seemed to attribute harshness or unworthy motives to Jehovah, he resorted to allegory partly out of reverence, convinced that the Spirit’s true intention could not be incompatible with God’s goodness.

Furthermore, his allegories often aimed at moral transformation. He did not spin symbolic interpretations for intellectual entertainment; he wanted believers to grow in holiness. When he turned a narrative into a lesson about spiritual warfare or purity, his goal was to stir his hearers to repentance and obedience.

These intentions—Christ-centeredness, unity of Scripture, reverence for God, and moral exhortation—are commendable. They show a heart that loves the Bible and longs to see its truths shape the church.

The Deep Problems with Allegorical Exegesis

However, good intentions do not guarantee sound method. Origen’s allegorical approach suffers from serious weaknesses that later history magnified.

First, allegory undermines the clarity and sufficiency of the literal sense. If the “real” meaning of a passage lies beneath the surface, known only to those trained in special techniques, then ordinary believers are left dependent on expert allegorists. Scripture’s plain speech about creation, sin, covenant, and redemption is easily eclipsed by creative spiritualizing.

Second, allegory opens the door to subjectivity. Because the link between the text and its alleged spiritual meaning is often not grounded in grammar or context, almost any symbolic scheme can be imposed upon the words. Origen’s interpretations sometimes differ drastically from those of other allegorists; the method has no built-in control. This makes it difficult to test interpretations by the standard of “What did the author intend under the Spirit’s guidance?”

Third, allegory distorts salvation history. By treating Israel’s experiences as mainly symbols of inner spiritual states, Origen blurs the concrete unfolding of Jehovah’s plan through covenants, promises, and real events. The particular role of Abraham’s descendants, the significance of the exodus, the importance of God’s dealings with Israel as a nation—all can fade into generalized images of the soul’s journey.

Fourth, allegory made it easier for Origen to import philosophical ideas not rooted in Scripture. His speculations about the preexistence of souls, the eventual restoration of all rational beings (apokatastasis), and the cyclical nature of history were not drawn from careful exegesis of specific texts; they were encouraged by a mindset that viewed biblical language as flexible material to be molded in line with a philosophical vision.

While Origen affirmed the bodily resurrection and the reality of judgment, his tendency to subordinate clear statements of Scripture to overarching spiritual schemes led him into errors that later councils rightly rejected.

From a conservative evangelical perspective, committed to the historical-grammatical method, these weaknesses are decisive. Allegory, as a dominant hermeneutic, cannot safeguard the inerrant, literal meaning of the Spirit-inspired text. Genuine typology—rooted in history and authorized by Scripture itself—has a proper place. But Origen’s free allegorizing goes beyond typology and cannot serve as a faithful model for interpreting the Bible.

---

Commentaries and the Shaping of Later Theology

A Vast Corpus of Exegetical Work

Despite the problems in his method, Origen’s sheer output in biblical exposition is staggering. He produced detailed commentaries on many books—John, Matthew, Romans, and others—along with numerous homilies that were later transcribed. Even in surviving fragments, his work fills many modern volumes.

In these commentaries, Origen often proceeds in layers. He may begin by explaining the grammar of a verse, the historical context, or parallel passages. He then moves to moral exhortation and finally to symbolic readings that he regards as the spiritual heart of the text. His comments range from brief scholia on difficult phrases to extended discussions of theological themes.

When he treats the Gospel of John, for example, he reflects deeply on Christ as the Logos, the eternal Word of God, through whom all things were made. He affirms that the Word was with God and was God, and that He truly became flesh. He meditates on the relation between the Father and the Son, on the meaning of light and life, and on the believer’s union with Christ. Many of his insights in this area were later used by theologians defending the full deity of Christ against Arianism.

In his commentary on Romans, Origen wrestles with questions of sin, grace, law, and righteousness. He does not always read Paul through a strictly historical lens, and his allegorical tendencies appear, but he still recognizes the centrality of Christ’s atoning death and the necessity of faith.

Doctrinal Seeds: Trinity and Christology

Origen’s exegesis helped plant doctrinal seeds that later grew in different directions. Concerning the Trinity, he clearly confessed that the Father, the Son, and the holy spirit are distinct, that the Son is eternally generated by the Father, and that the Spirit proceeds from the Father (and is sent by the Son). He resisted modalism, insisting that the Father and the Son are not the same person playing different roles.

Yet Origen also spoke of the Son as subordinate to the Father in a way that, if taken without nuance, could feed later Arian tendencies. He sometimes described the Father as “the God” in an absolute sense and the Son as “a second God,” though he insisted on unity of will and image. His philosophical concept of eternal emanation influenced this language.

In Christology, he emphasized that the same Person who is the eternal Logos became truly human. He saw Christ’s human soul as the instrument through which the divine Word united Himself to flesh. But his speculation about the preexistence of souls and the nature of Christ’s soul led to complex theories that later required correction.

Later theologians such as the Cappadocian Fathers, Athanasius, and others drew from Origen’s exegesis where it harmonized with Scripture, while rejecting his speculative excesses. His work became a treasury from which both orthodoxy and heterodoxy could draw, depending on which strands they emphasized.

Transmission and Transformation

Origen wrote in Greek. His works were preserved and spread both directly and through later translations. In the Latin West, much of his thought reached readers through figures like Rufinus and Jerome. Rufinus, sympathetic to Origen, sometimes softened or omitted passages he considered problematic when he translated them. Jerome, initially appreciative, later turned critical during the so-called Origenist controversies, drawing attention to the more dangerous aspects of Origen’s theology.

Because of this complex transmission, Origen’s influence is woven into many later works, sometimes clearly acknowledged, sometimes indirect. Medieval exegesis, especially in the East, bears marks of his allegorical style. At the same time, certain of his doctrinal errors were explicitly condemned in later centuries, even while his exegetical techniques continued to shape commentaries and sermons.

---

His Impact on the Christian Intellectual Tradition

A Model of Christian Scholarship

Despite his flaws, Origen established a lasting model of Christian scholarship. He treated theology not as a shallow rehearsal of slogans but as disciplined reflection on the inspired Scriptures. He learned languages, compared manuscripts, and engaged with both Jewish and pagan critics.

In his treatise Against Celsus, Origen answered a cultured pagan opponent who mocked Christianity as irrational and morally suspect. Origen responded point by point, demonstrating that the faith rests on historical events, fulfilled prophecy, and transformed lives. Although some of his philosophical concessions need careful evaluation, his willingness to face hostile arguments and to answer them from Scripture and reason set an example for later apologists.

He also contributed to the idea that Christians should love God with all their mind as well as heart and strength. For him, study of the Word was an act of worship. He urged believers, especially teachers, to labor over Scripture, to pray for insight, and to rely on the Spirit’s illumination as they handled the text.

The Long Shadow of Allegory

Yet the most far-reaching aspect of Origen’s influence lay in his hermeneutic. His threefold sense of Scripture and his rich allegorical exegesis became foundational for much of later patristic and medieval interpretation.

In both East and West, commentators adopted the idea that passages possess multiple levels of meaning. Over time, this grew into the common scheme of literal, allegorical, moral, and anagogical senses. While some writers continued to value the literal sense, it was often the spiritual meanings that captured attention. Sermons and commentaries overflowed with symbolic readings that sometimes bore little relation to the original context.

This mindset made it easier for church tradition and ecclesiastical authority to overshadow Scripture. If the deepest meanings of the text are available only through spiritual insight or church-sanctioned allegory, then ordinary believers are discouraged from reading the Bible for themselves with expectation of clear understanding. The sufficiency and perspicuity of Scripture, so evident in the apostolic writings, became obscured.

When, many centuries later, reforming movements sought to return to the plain sense of Scripture, they had to push against a long heritage shaped in part by Origen’s allegorical influence. The recovery of historical-grammatical exegesis—reading the text in its own context, according to normal rules of language—was as much a reaction against the dominance of allegory as it was against other kinds of tradition.

Lessons for Contemporary Readers

For believers today who uphold the Bible as the inerrant, infallible Word of God and who use the historical-grammatical method, Origen’s story offers important lessons.

It reminds us that zeal for Scripture, impressive learning, and sincere devotion do not automatically protect an interpreter from error if the underlying method is unsound. Origen’s love for the Bible is not in doubt, yet his allegorical approach led him to conclusions that conflict with the straightforward teaching of the text.

It also warns us against allowing philosophical systems to set the agenda for exegesis. Origen’s Platonist inheritance encouraged him to value the spiritual over the physical, to see matter as lower, and to long for a purely spiritual vision of God. These assumptions sometimes pulled his interpretations away from the Bible’s affirmation of the goodness of creation, the reality of bodily resurrection, and the concrete nature of Jehovah’s kingdom purposes.

At the same time, his diligence challenges us not to be lazy readers. Historical-grammatical interpretation does not mean shallow reading; it calls for careful attention to words, syntax, context, and the canonical flow of Scripture. Origen’s commitment to textual accuracy, his willingness to learn languages, and his relentless study, when directed by sound method, would be a model worth imitating.

Ultimately, Origen’s influence on the Christian intellectual tradition is a mixture of help and hindrance. He helped establish the expectation that Christian leaders should be capable interpreters of Scripture and thoughtful respondents to culture. He hindered later generations by reinforcing a hermeneutic that often obscured the plain meaning of the text and encouraged speculative theology.

For a history of Christianity that seeks to be faithful to Jehovah’s revelation, Origen stands as both a brilliant scholar and a cautionary figure. His life and work call us to hold firmly to the sufficiency of the Spirit-inspired Word, to interpret it according to its God-given grammatical and historical sense, and to resist the temptation to search for hidden meanings when the Lord has already spoken clearly.

You May Also Enjoy

Justin Martyr and the Apologetic Defense of Christianity

About the Author

CLICK LINKED IMAGE TO VISIT ONLINE STORE

CLICK TO SCROLL THROUGH OUR BOOKS