When Jesus the Messiah ascended and sat at the right hand of Jehovah, His work on earth did not cease. He continued to speak and to shepherd His people through men He had chosen, the apostles and their close associates. What they first proclaimed orally in synagogues, marketplaces, and homes soon also existed in written form—apostolic letters and Gospels that carried the same authority as their spoken preaching.

These writings were not human reflections that later generations slowly elevated into “Scripture.” From the moment Jehovah breathed them out by holy spirit, they were Scripture, even if not every congregation possessed every book at once. The history of the canon is therefore not the history of human councils granting authority to books, but the history of congregations recognizing, receiving, and copying the writings that already had authority because they came from Christ through His authorized spokesmen.

In this article we remain firmly within the first-century setting. We consider the nature and authority of apostolic letters, the circulation of Gospel traditions, the criteria that believers used to recognize inspired writings, the problem of pseudonymous claims and how the apostles guarded authenticity, and finally the completion of the canon by the end of the first century, when the last apostolic writings were given. Later centuries would echo, confirm, and defend what Jehovah had already done, but they did not add to what Christ had completed through His apostles.

---

The Nature and Authority of Apostolic Letters

Apostles as Christ’s Authorized Spokesmen

In the Gospels, Jesus chose twelve men to “be with Him” and to be sent out to preach. After His resurrection, He commissioned them as witnesses to His life, death, and resurrection, promising that holy spirit would empower them for this role. He promised that the Spirit would teach them all things and remind them of all that He had said. Their authority did not rest on personal brilliance but on Christ’s appointment and the Spirit’s guidance.

When we read, “Paul, an apostle of Jesus Christ by the will of God,” or “Peter, an apostle of Jesus Christ,” the opening lines are not mere formalities. They assert that what follows is not just a private opinion but the message of Christ conveyed through a chosen envoy. To disobey an apostolic command was to disobey the Lord who sent him. When Paul wrote to the Thessalonians, he could say that those who rejected his instruction were rejecting not man but God.

This authority carried over to their written communication. Apostolic letters are not less authoritative than apostolic preaching. When congregations could not hear the apostles in person, they heard them through their letters read aloud in the assembly. The same Christ who spoke by the Spirit when Paul or Peter stood in a synagogue also spoke by the Spirit when their letters were unfolded in a house congregation far away.

Letters as Scripture Within the First Century

Already within the New Testament itself we see apostolic writings treated as Scripture. Peter, writing to believers scattered in various provinces, refers to Paul’s letters and says that some distort them “as they do the other Scriptures.” That phrase shows two important realities. First, Paul’s letters were known and circulated widely enough to form a recognizable collection. Second, Peter placed them on the same level as the sacred writings of Israel.

Paul himself expected his letters to be read publicly and shared among congregations. To the Colossians he wrote that his letter should be read to them and then read also in the congregation of Laodicea, and that they in turn should read the letter coming from Laodicea. To the Thessalonians he solemnly charged that his letter be read to all the brothers. These directives show that the letters were not private notes but congregational documents intended for broad circulation.

In addition, apostolic writings cite one another as Scripture. In one of the pastoral letters, an instruction about supporting elders appeals to “Scripture,” quoting first from Deuteronomy—“You shall not muzzle an ox while it is threshing”—and then from a saying of Jesus found in the Gospel tradition: “The laborer is worthy of his wages.” The fact that a saying of Jesus from a written Gospel is cited alongside the Law of Moses under the single label “Scripture” reveals how highly these writings were regarded even before the first century closed.

Thus, the authority of apostolic writings is not something imposed long after by distant councils. It is recognized by the apostles themselves and by the congregations that first received their letters. From the beginning, these documents functioned as the written standard of doctrine and conduct.

The Written Word as a Safeguard

Why did Jehovah move the apostles to write instead of relying only on oral preaching? One reason is that written Scripture provides a stable, publicly examinable standard. Oral messages can be misremembered or misrepresented; letters can be copied, compared, and preserved.

Paul repeatedly warned congregations about false teachers and counterfeit messages. He reminded the Galatians that if anyone—whether an angel from heaven or even an apostle acting contrary to the original gospel—proclaimed a different message, that person was under God’s curse. The existence of written letters that recorded the authentic apostolic gospel enabled believers to test later claims against the original standard.

In that sense, apostolic writings are acts of pastoral care. The apostles knew they would not remain physically present with every congregation. Peter spoke about soon putting off his earthly dwelling and wrote so that, after his departure, believers would be able to recall these things. John wrote so that his readers would have joy, assurance, and protection against deceivers. The letters preserve the apostolic voice for generations who would never see the apostles’ faces, including believers today.

---

The Circulation of Gospel Traditions

From Eyewitness Proclamation to Written Gospels

Before any Gospel was written, the message about Jesus existed in living proclamation. The apostles bore witness to what they had seen and heard: His perfect life, His teaching with authority, His miracles, His death under Pontius Pilate, and His resurrection on the third day. They could say, “We are witnesses of these things.”

From the start, this witness had a fixed core. Paul reminds the Corinthians of the gospel he delivered as of first importance: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, that He was buried, that He was raised on the third day, and that He appeared to many witnesses. This summary shows that there was a stable body of truth, not a shifting legend.

In time, under the Spirit’s guidance, this apostolic proclamation was written down in four Gospels: Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. These are not conflicting stories but complementary portraits of the same Lord. Matthew and John were apostles; Mark was a close companion of Peter; Luke was a careful researcher and companion of Paul. All four stand within the circle of apostolic testimony.

Luke’s preface is especially instructive. He explains that many had undertaken to compile an account of the matters fulfilled among them, just as they were handed down by those who from the beginning were eyewitnesses and servants of the Word. He had followed everything closely and wrote an orderly account so that his reader might know the certainty of the things taught. This conscious concern for accuracy shows that the Gospels are grounded in historical reality, not in myth.

John’s Gospel explicitly claims eyewitness authority: “He who has seen has borne witness, and his witness is true.” John wrote so that readers might believe that Jesus is the Messiah, the Son of God, and that believing they might have life in His name. The Gospel traditions were not casual reflections; they were Spirit-guided records of events that carry eternal consequences.

Gospels Read Side by Side With the Letters

By the later decades of the first century, congregations possessed not only letters but also written accounts of Jesus’ life and teaching. These Gospels were read publicly just as the letters were. Believers needed to hear both the story of Jesus and the apostolic explanation of what His work meant.

Evidence from the letters themselves shows that Gospel material circulated widely. Paul quotes sayings of Jesus about marriage, about workers deserving their wages, and about the Lord’s Supper. James reflects Jesus’ teaching about the poor and the rich in ways that suggest familiarity with His words. The author of Hebrews alludes repeatedly to episodes such as the wilderness temptation and the prayers of Jesus in days of His flesh.

This interweaving of Gospel tradition and apostolic reflection meant that, already in the first century, the people of God were being shaped by a two-fold written testimony: narratives of the Messiah’s life and apostolic letters explaining the significance of His person and work. When later generations recognized four Gospels and the apostolic letters as the core of the New Testament, they were not inventing something new; they were continuing the pattern that had existed from the beginning.

---

Criteria for Recognizing Inspired Writings

Inspiration and Recognition Distinguished

It is important to distinguish between inspiration and recognition. Inspiration is what Jehovah does when He breathes out His Word through chosen writers; recognition is what congregations do when they acknowledge that a given writing is indeed from God. The criteria used by believers do not make a book inspired; they simply identify the marks of the divine work already present.

In the first century, as writings circulated, congregations had to discern which documents carried the same authority as the Law and the Prophets and which did not. Several factors guided their recognition, and we can see these factors already reflected in the New Testament itself.

Apostolic Origin or Connection

The most basic question was whether a writing came from an apostle or from someone closely associated with an apostle. Apostles were uniquely authorized witnesses of the risen Christ. Their authority could be extended through trusted co-workers who wrote under their influence.

Thus, Romans or Ephesians bear the name of Paul; 1 and 2 Peter bear the name of Peter; 1 John comes from the beloved disciple. Mark, though not an apostle, wrote in connection with Peter’s preaching. Luke, though not an apostle, wrote as one who had carefully investigated everything from the beginning and was a recognized companion of Paul. James and Jude, as brothers of the Lord, wrote with recognized authority in the early congregations.

When Paul warned the Thessalonians against messages “as if from us” in a forged letter, he made clear that only writings truly from an apostle carried binding authority. Apostolic origin therefore became a primary mark for recognizing Scripture. Once the apostles and their immediate circle passed from the scene, no new writings of equal rank could be produced.

Doctrinal Consistency With the Apostolic Gospel

A second factor was doctrinal harmony. Any writing truly from Jehovah would agree with the pattern of sound words already delivered by the apostles. Paul told the Galatians that even if he himself or an angel from heaven preached a different gospel, such a message had to be rejected. Believers were to hold to the traditions they had received, whether by word or by letter.

This did not mean rejecting every new situation or question; the apostles themselves applied the gospel to new issues, such as the Gentile question addressed at the Jerusalem Council. But it did mean that any writing that denied fundamental truths—such as the true humanity and true deity of Christ, His bodily resurrection, or salvation by grace through faith—could not come from God.

The letters of John and Jude, for example, urge believers to test spirits and to contend for the faith once for all delivered to the holy ones. This faith is not a shifting set of opinions; it is a definite body of truth given through the apostles. Writings that harmonized with this faith could be received; writings that contradicted it were rejected.

Widespread Acceptance Among Faithful Congregations

A third factor was what might be called “catholicity,” that is, widespread use among congregations known to hold to the apostolic gospel. A letter written by Paul to one city was soon copied and sent to others. Over time, collections of Pauline letters, Gospel accounts, and other apostolic writings came to be known across regions from Judea to Asia Minor and from Greece to Rome.

When a document was cherished and read in congregations that were founded by apostles and were careful about doctrine, this was strong evidence that it was genuinely apostolic. Conversely, writings that appeared only in one small group, particularly groups with questionable doctrine, were viewed with suspicion.

Even within the New Testament we see the beginnings of this process. The author of 2 Peter speaks of “all” Paul’s letters; the pastoral letters refer to “the Scripture” being read and known. By the time the last apostle died, there was already a core of writings recognized across the Christian world as the standard of teaching.

Spiritual Character and Power

Finally, believers recognized in inspired writings a distinctive spiritual quality. Scripture has a living and active character. It penetrates the heart, exposes sin, comforts the repentant, and builds faith. When congregations heard apostolic writings read aloud, they experienced this convicting and nourishing power. The sheep of Christ heard the Shepherd’s voice in these texts.

This inner quality did not replace external marks such as apostolic origin and doctrinal harmony, but it confirmed them. Jehovah’s people, taught by the Spirit through the Word, were able to recognize the difference between the voice of their Lord and the voice of strangers. That recognition did not make the canon; it responded to the canon that God had made.

---

Pseudonymous Claims and Authenticity Challenges

Warnings About Forged Letters

From early on, the apostles were aware that some would produce counterfeit writings. Paul warned the Thessalonians not to be disturbed by a message “either by spirit or word or letter as if from us,” suggesting that even in his lifetime someone had tried to produce a letter claiming to be apostolic.

To guard against such fraud, Paul sometimes highlighted his own handwriting in the closing lines, noting that this was the mark of his genuine letters. This concern would be meaningless if pseudonymous letters bearing his name were acceptable. The very fact that he warned against forged letters proves that deception in authorship was inconsistent with the apostolic office and with Christian integrity.

False Apostles and Their Messages

The apostles also warned about false apostles and prophets. In Corinth, Paul confronted those who claimed apostolic status but preached a different Jesus and a different spirit. John urged his readers not to believe every spirit but to test the spirits, because many false prophets had gone out into the world. These deceivers often claimed revelatory authority, but their teaching did not match the truth about Christ handed down by the original witnesses.

Because of this, early congregations learned to be cautious about new claims. A document that simply appeared with an apostle’s name on it could not be assumed genuine. It had to be compared with known apostolic teaching, checked against the recollections of those who had known the apostle, and evaluated in terms of its use among faithful congregations.

Rejection of Pseudonymity as Compatible With Inspiration

In later centuries, some scholars would propose that certain New Testament writings were produced by anonymous Christians who attached apostolic names to their works as a literary device. From a historical-grammatical and biblical perspective, this idea is incompatible with both the ethical standards and the self-conscious claims of the writings themselves.

The letters that claim to be from Paul, Peter, James, John, and Jude present themselves as genuine correspondence from these individuals to real congregations or persons. They appeal to shared experiences, mutual acquaintances, and specific circumstances. If they were produced by later unknown authors using borrowed names, they would be deliberate deceptions, not harmless conventions. Jehovah, who hates lying lips, would not breathe out His inerrant Word through a fraudulent claim.

Moreover, the congregations closest in time to the apostles—those who still remembered them or knew their direct disciples—received these writings as genuine. They would have been in the best position to detect impostors. It is far more reasonable to accept the straightforward claim that the New Testament writings are what they say they are: the authentic letters and narratives produced by the apostles and their close companions.

Non-Canonical Writings and Their Status

Alongside the canonical books, various other writings arose in the first and second centuries: additional “acts,” “gospels,” and “apocalypses.” Some were orthodox reflections; others contained serious doctrinal errors. However they are evaluated historically, the early congregations drew a clear line between such works and the apostolic writings.

While some non-canonical texts might be read for private benefit, they were not read in the congregation as Scripture, nor were they included in the collections of apostolic books used in worship. Their limited use, questionable authorship, and in some cases unbiblical content marked them as different. The canon was not an open shelf on which any religious text could find a place; it was the set of books recognized as the very Word of God, and that set was bounded by apostolic authority and doctrinal truth.

---

The Completion of the Canon in the First Century

The Chronological Frame of New Testament Writing

The writings that make up the New Testament were produced within a bounded period, from shortly after Jesus’ resurrection and ascension until the end of the first century. While exact dates for each book cannot be determined with mathematical precision, a reasonable chronology, using conservative historical-grammatical analysis, locates the earliest letters in the 40s C.E. and the latest writings around 96–98 C.E.

Some early letters, such as James and 1 Thessalonians, belong to the first wave of apostolic correspondence. Paul’s major epistles—Romans, 1 and 2 Corinthians, Galatians—emerged during his missionary journeys and their aftermath. The pastoral letters, addressing leadership and doctrine in maturing congregations, come later in his ministry.

The Synoptic Gospels and Acts were written while eyewitnesses were still alive, with Luke-Acts carefully researched and composed in connection with Paul’s circle. John’s Gospel and his letters appear toward the end of the century, reflecting deep reflection on the person of Christ in the face of early distortions. The book of Revelation, written by John during his exile on Patmos, is commonly dated to the reign of Domitian, around 96 C.E.

By the time John penned the final lines of Revelation, all the books that God intended to include in the New Testament canon had been written. No new apostolic voices would arise after his death.

Revelation’s Warning and the Closure of Prophetic Scripture

The last book of the New Testament closes with a sobering warning: if anyone adds to the prophetic words of this book, God will add to that person the plagues described in it; if anyone takes away from the words of this book, God will take away that person’s share in the holy city and in the things described. In its immediate context, this warning refers specifically to the book of Revelation. Yet it also fittingly stands at the end of the entire canon, echoing earlier warnings in the Law not to add to or subtract from God’s commands.

The combination of Revelation’s final position in the sequence of apostolic writings, its climactic portrayal of Christ’s return and the new heaven and new earth, and its explicit warning against alteration naturally signaled to the early congregations that the stream of prophetic Scripture had reached its completion. Jehovah had spoken through the Law, the Prophets, the Writings, the Gospels, the apostolic letters, and at last this grand prophetic vision. No further inspired books were needed or promised.

Early Canon Consciousness Within the First Century

Even before the last books were written, there is evidence that Christians were conscious of living under a new covenant document. Paul’s reference to “all” his letters, Peter’s description of those letters as Scripture, and the pastoral instructions about reading Scripture in the congregation all indicate that believers saw these writings as a defined body of divine revelation.

The author of 2 Peter, near the end of his life, reminds his readers to remember the prediction of the holy prophets and the commandment of the Lord and Savior through the apostles. Here the Old Testament prophets and the New Testament apostles are placed side by side as channels of God’s authoritative Word. John, in his letters, speaks of “what you have heard from the beginning” and warns against anyone who goes beyond the teaching of Christ. He assumes that there is a fixed apostolic message that must not be altered.

By the end of the century, congregations across the Roman world were reading the same core documents: the four Gospels, Acts, collections of Pauline letters, general letters such as 1 Peter and 1 John, and Revelation. Local variations in which smaller books had reached which regions did not change the reality that Jehovah’s canon was complete. Subsequent recognition was a matter of receiving what He had already given, not of deciding what He ought to have given.

Later Recognition as Affirmation, Not Creation

In the second and third centuries, Christian writers frequently quoted New Testament books as Scripture and distinguished them from other writings. Lists of recognized books began to appear, and debates about a few smaller letters occurred in some regions. But these later discussions did not create the canon; they clarified and defended the canon that had been in functional use since the apostles’ time.

When later councils pronounced which books were to be read in the congregation as Scripture, they were simply giving formal recognition to the set of writings that had long been used and honored. The real moment of canon formation was not in those councils but in the first century, when Jehovah inspired the books through His chosen servants and the congregations began to receive them.

This understanding guards Christians from the notion that human institutions stand over the Bible, determining its contents. Instead, we acknowledge that Jehovah stands over His people, giving His Word, and that His people, guided by the Spirit through that same Word, simply acknowledge what He has done.

The Canon and the Sufficiency of Scripture Today

Because the canon was completed in the first century, there are no additional inspired books waiting to be discovered, and no modern revelations can stand alongside Scripture as equal authority. The faith has been delivered once for all to the holy ones. The Scriptures are able to make believers wise for salvation through faith in Christ and to equip them thoroughly for every good work.

This does not mean that the Spirit now indwells individuals in a mystical way; guidance comes through the Spirit-inspired Word, rightly understood and applied. The same Jehovah who guided the apostles in writing Scripture now guides Christians as they read, study, and obey it.

The formation and completion of the New Testament canon therefore call believers to deep reverence for the Bible. These books are not merely ancient literature; they are the living voice of the risen Christ. From the apostolic letters to the final visions of Revelation, they present the one unified message of Jehovah’s saving purpose through His Son. To submit to these writings is to submit to Christ Himself. To add to them or set them aside is to rebel against the Lord who speaks in them.

From the nature and authority of apostolic letters, through the circulation of Gospel traditions, the recognition of inspired writings, the rejection of pseudonymous claims, and the completion of the canon in the first century, we see a single, coherent work of God. Jehovah preserved His truth in written form so that generation after generation might hear, believe, and obey. The history of the canon is, at its heart, the history of His faithfulness to His Word and to His people.

You May Also Enjoy

The Apostle Paul’s Arrest, First, and Second Imprisonments at Rome

About the Author

CLICK LINKED IMAGE TO VISIT ONLINE STORE

CLICK TO SCROLL THROUGH OUR BOOKS