Scripture’s Authority and the Question of Scientific Accuracy

The question of whether the Bible contains scientific errors has been raised throughout history by skeptics, critics, and those influenced by naturalistic assumptions. Yet the Scriptures are the inspired, inerrant, and infallible Word of God, conveyed through divinely guided human authors who wrote with precision and clarity according to the Historical-Grammatical method. As 2 Peter 1:21 affirms, these men “spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit.” The issue is therefore not whether Scripture fails, but whether interpreters misunderstand the text, impose foreign expectations onto its wording, or ignore the context, genre, or authorial intent under divine inspiration.

The Bible is not a scientific textbook. It does not use modern technical terminology, nor does it attempt to explain natural phenomena through the lens of twenty-first-century research. Rather, it communicates truth accurately and coherently to its intended audience while describing reality in common observational language, the same way people speak today when referencing sunrise, sunset, or the movement of the heavens. Scientific precision and phenomenological expression are not mutually exclusive. When Scripture touches on matters involving the natural world, it consistently aligns with accurate scientific concepts—often long before human discovery.

Science itself cannot answer ultimate questions of origin, purpose, design, morality, or destiny. It can examine created processes, but it cannot account for the existence of those processes. Scientific inquiry repeatedly reveals astonishing levels of order, complexity, precision, and interdependence—realities that testify to the infinite intelligence and power of the Creator. The apostle Paul makes this unmistakably clear: “For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made.” (Romans 1:20, UASV) Astronomy, cosmology, biology, neurology, genetics, and physics all reveal layers of complexity that comport naturally with the biblical worldview.

The issue, then, is never that Scripture contradicts science. The conflict arises when human interpretations of either Scripture or scientific data are flawed.

Historical Case Study: Galileo, Misinterpretation, and Misplaced Authority

The conflict surrounding Galileo is frequently misrepresented as a battle between the Bible and science. In reality, it was a confrontation between scientific evidence and ecclesiastical tradition. The Catholic Church had adopted a geocentric cosmology derived from pagan Greek philosophical views, especially those of Aristotle and Ptolemy. Ptolemy (b. c. 85 C.E.) had argued that the earth was the center of the cosmos, and this model became entrenched in church dogma—not because Scripture teaches it, but because church authorities imposed it.

Galileo’s observations demonstrated that the earth revolves around the sun. Instead of reexamining their interpretation of Scripture, Catholic authorities insisted Galileo’s findings were heretical. He was forced to recant, and only centuries later (in 1992) did the Church officially acknowledge its error.

The Bible itself never teaches geocentrism. No verse states that the sun orbits the earth. The controversy arose solely because the Church conflated its own tradition with divine revelation. It treated pagan cosmology as if it were inspired.

This event illustrates a crucial principle: Scripture does not err, but interpreters often do. Galileo himself wrote, “Even though Scripture cannot err, its interpreters and expositors can.” The issue was not with the biblical text, but with a faulty hermeneutic that ignored genre, context, and authorial intent.

The Historical-Grammatical Framework: Understanding Scriptural Language

Biblical authors communicated in normal human language, using observational terminology understandable to their readers. This is fully compatible with accuracy. Modern meteorologists still speak of “sunrise” and “sunset,” though they know the earth rotates. Scientific precision and phenomenological description coexist without contradiction.

Scripture also employs poetry, metaphor, hyperbole, personification, and parallelism—all legitimate features of human language. The presence of figurative expressions does not diminish truthfulness; it enriches communication. The key is identifying the genre and interpreting accordingly.

The Historical-Grammatical method recognizes:

1. Authorial intent under divine inspiration.
2. The linguistic conventions of Hebrew and Greek.
3. Normal rules of grammar and syntax.
4. The historical and covenantal context.
5. The difference between literal description and figurative imagery.

With this foundation established, we now examine specific passages often misunderstood as scientifically inaccurate. In each case, Scripture demonstrates precision when rightly interpreted.

Isaiah 40:22: The Circle of the Earth

Isaiah 40:22 (UASV)

22 It is he who sits above the circle of the earth, and its inhabitants are like grasshoppers; who stretches out the heavens like a curtain, and spreads them like a tent to dwell in.

Isaiah wrote around the eighth century B.C.E., long before formal astronomical discovery. Yet he accurately referred to the earth as a “circle,” a term consistent with a spherical shape. The Hebrew word chugh conveys roundness or sphericity. Isaiah was not delivering a technical astronomical treatise, but the language is fully compatible with modern understanding.

Furthermore, Isaiah describes the heavens as being “stretched out.” This expression is remarkably consistent with the expanding universe model, which modern cosmology has confirmed. The prophet’s observation stands in striking harmony with scientific discovery, though he wrote in pre-scientific times.

The remarkable accuracy of the text cannot be attributed to human speculation; it reflects divine revelation. The choice of vocabulary fits perfectly with what later generations would observe from space.

Job 26:7: The Earth Hanging on Nothing

Job 26:7 (UASV)

7 He stretches out the north over empty space and hangs the earth on nothing.

Many ancient cultures imagined the earth resting on pillars, animals, or deities. Yet the book of Job—written centuries before classical Greek philosophy—states that the earth “hangs on nothing.” This perfectly matches gravitational reality. Moses, who compiled the book of Job, recorded this truth long before the Greek astronomer Eratosthenes (c. 276–194 B.C.E.) estimated the earth’s circumference.

There is no naturalistic explanation for how Job could have known this apart from divine revelation. The text is scientifically accurate in a way unique for its time.

Joshua 10:13: Did the Sun Stand Still?

Joshua 10:13 (UASV)

13 And the sun stood still, and the moon stopped, until the nation avenged themselves of their enemies…

Critics frequently cite this verse to claim that the Bible teaches geocentrism. Yet this account uses observational language, just as modern people speak of sunrise and sunset. The miracle involved an extraordinary extension of daylight for Israel’s battle.

Two considerations preserve inerrancy:

1. Scripture describes the event phenomenologically.
   It reports what observers saw, not the mechanics behind it.
2. Jehovah, who created all physical laws, can alter natural processes.
   If He chose to modify the earth’s rotation or produce extended light through refraction, atmospheric conditions, or another mechanism, the result would appear exactly as described.

Nothing in the account asserts incorrect scientific principles. Instead, it affirms God’s sovereign intervention.

2 Kings 20:8–11: The Shadow Moving Backward

In Hezekiah’s day, Jehovah provided a sign involving the shadow on the steps of Ahaz moving backward. This phenomenon involved an extraordinary manipulation of light or time-scale perception. Again, Scripture does not explain the mechanism, nor is it required to do so. The text reports the observed result accurately.

Intervention by the Creator does not undermine scientific order; it demonstrates His authority over the laws He established.

Judges 5:20: Did the Stars Fight?

Judges 5:20 (UASV)

20 From heaven the stars fought, from their courses they fought against Sisera.

This verse appears in a poetic victory song. Poetry employs imagery to communicate theological truth—in this case, that Jehovah intervened decisively for Israel. Judges 4 (prose) provides the historical narrative, while Judges 5 (poetry) conveys emotional and theological depth.

The phrase “the stars fought” is not scientific description but poetic language indicating divine involvement. Hebrew poetry frequently uses cosmological imagery to portray God’s power. The context requires figurative interpretation, not literal astronomical combat.

Phenomenological Language and Scientific Accuracy

The Bible uses normal human speech describing phenomena as they appear. This does not compromise factual accuracy. People today still describe the sun rising or setting though they understand the earth’s rotation. Scripture uses such expressions without affirming geocentric cosmology.

Key examples:

• The “foundations of the earth” refer to stability (Psalm 104:5).
• “Winds” are described by direction or effect, not meteorological categorization.
• The “ends of the earth” refer to extremities, not flat geography.

These expressions conform to ancient Near Eastern communication, not to error. The inerrant Scriptures convey truth in language suited to their readership.

Creation and the Nature of Scientific Inquiry

Genesis describes creation in six “days,” which represent extended periods. The account is orderly, coherent, and compatible with known scientific principles. Genesis does not employ mythological language. It avoids pagan cosmologies involving cosmic battles, sexualized deities, or the materialization of gods. Instead, it presents Jehovah as the sovereign Creator who brings all things into existence through His command.

Scientific investigation repeatedly confirms design, fine-tuning, and complexity inconsistent with random emergence:

• The precise constants of physics
• The anthropic balance of the cosmos
• Genetic information encoded with astonishing sophistication
• Cellular machinery exhibiting engineering-level complexity
• Ecological interdependence
• Mathematical structure embedded in the natural world

These realities support a biblical worldview grounded in divine wisdom.

Misinterpretation as the Source of Alleged Errors

Historically, supposed contradictions between science and Scripture stem from misreadings of the text. Critics often:

1. Demand modern scientific vocabulary from ancient authors.
2. Ignore genre distinctions.
3. Misunderstand phenomenological descriptions.
4. Assume ancient people were incapable of accurate observation.
5. Impose naturalistic assumptions on the biblical record.

When these errors are removed, Scripture stands consistent, coherent, and scientifically aligned whenever it addresses the natural world.

Scientific Consistency Across the Canon

Throughout the Bible, one finds numerous phrases that harmonize with scientific realities:

• Water cycle descriptions (Ecclesiastes 1:7)
• Sea paths (Psalm 8:8)
• Fixed stars and distinct constellations (Job 38:31–33)
• Life existing in “kinds” rather than evolutionary transmutation (Genesis 1)
• Human biology described with remarkable insight (Psalm 139:13–16)
• Gravitational and orbital stability implied in creation language

None of these passages contain scientific errors. Instead, they show an awareness that surpasses the cosmological myths of neighboring cultures.

Scripture Stands Without Error

The Bible contains no scientific mistakes. What critics perceive as errors are either misunderstandings of observational language, failures to recognize genre, or attempts to impose modern scientific categories on ancient expressions. When interpreted using the Historical-Grammatical method, every passage harmonizes with established scientific principles or legitimately employs figurative language.

The Word of God is trustworthy, accurate, and fully reliable. Scientific discoveries continually confirm, rather than contradict, the truths of Scripture. As Hebrews 3:4 states, “every house is built by someone, but the builder of all things is God.” Creation itself testifies to His genius, His sovereignty, and His power.

You May Also Enjoy

THE NEW TESTAMENT: Its Most Difficult Passages Explained

About the Author

CLICK LINKED IMAGE TO VISIT ONLINE STORE

CLICK TO SCROLL THROUGH OUR BOOKS