The Commissioning at Antioch

Luke’s narrative of Acts 13–14 presents the first fully organized outreach from a local congregation to regions beyond, a decisive moment when the assembly at Antioch in Syria, under the Spirit’s direction through the Word, set apart Barnabas and Saul for a defined gospel circuit. This journey belongs to the early expansion of the New Covenant witness beyond Judea and Samaria into the broader Greco-Roman world. The date is best placed in 47–48 C.E., after the famine relief visit to Jerusalem and before the Jerusalem meeting of Acts 15. The Antioch church had already demonstrated doctrinal stability, generosity, and a Scripture-regulated piety. Prophets and teachers—men gifted for the exposition and application of the previously revealed Word—were ministering. Their service did not introduce new doctrine independent of Christ’s apostolic revelation; rather, they applied the written prophetic and apostolic message to the congregation’s life and mission.

Luke lists Barnabas, Simeon called Niger, Lucius of Cyrene, Manaen, and Saul. The diversity of this elder teaching team displays how the Abrahamic promise—blessing to all families of the earth—had begun to unfold through the gospel of Jesus the Messiah, while preserving covenantal continuity with Israel’s Scriptures. The assembly fasted and prayed. Their fasting reflected earnest concentration upon Jehovah’s will revealed through Scripture and apostolic instruction, not a ritual meriting favor. Prayer acknowledged dependence upon God, Who had prepared beforehand the works in which His people should walk. The Holy Spirit directed the church to set apart Barnabas and Saul “for the work to which” they had been called. The Spirit’s call here is mediated and publicly recognized; it upheld the objective apostolic mandate Christ had already given, rather than replacing sound congregational discernment. The laying on of hands testified to fellowship and recognition, not transmission of mystical power. This coherence with the Historical-Grammatical reading prevents later charismatic misreadings and preserves the point: Christ’s mission advances through Scripture-governed congregations that recognize and send tested men.

Doctrinally, the commissioning at Antioch safeguards two lessons. First, evangelism is not an optional side project but the ordained means by which Jehovah gathers repentant sinners into Christ. Second, missionary authorization arises from faithful local congregations that measure men by objective qualifications, doctrine, and proven service. Saul’s prior boldness in Damascus and Jerusalem, Barnabas’s character, and both men’s teaching labors at Antioch had already manifested suitability. The Spirit guided this recognition in perfect concord with the revealed Word, exemplifying Molinist clarity: Jehovah’s exhaustive foreknowledge of counterfactuals never destroys genuine human responsibility. He knows which faithful servants, in which circumstances, will freely act, and He weaves their freely chosen obedience into His wise plan without coercing their wills.

Cyprus: Preaching in Salamis and Paphos

From Seleucia, the port of Antioch, Barnabas and Saul sailed to Cyprus, Barnabas’s native island. The order reflects practical wisdom under Providence. Barnabas’s background gave natural bridges for the message, and Cyprus occupied a strategic position between Syria and the wider Mediterranean. The missionaries began in Salamis, the principal eastern port, proclaiming the Word in the synagogues. This synagogue-first approach is consistently theological rather than merely tactical. The gospel is God’s covenant fulfillment to Israel, now extending to the nations without replacement of Israel but in continuity with Abrahamic promise. By entering synagogues, the missionaries recognized Scripture’s storyline and honored the custodians of Jehovah’s oracles, while calling all hearers to the promised Messiah.

John Mark served as assistant. His role can be understood as logistical support, attendant ministry, and participation in the proclamation as opportunities arose. Luke’s restrained comment illustrates his careful historiography. Mark’s later departure does not negate his usefulness; Scripture’s honesty about ministerial difficulties reinforces that salvation history is advanced by real men with real weaknesses whom God employs.

Moving along the island to Paphos, the team encountered two emblematic figures: Sergius Paulus, a proconsul described as intelligent, and Elymas (Bar-Jesus), a Jewish occult practitioner who attempted to turn the proconsul from the faith. The confrontation is not a sensational display; it is theologically charged. A Jewish false prophet opposed the fulfillment of Israel’s hope in the Messiah. Saul—henceforth called Paul, perhaps indicating the shift to Gentile mission contexts where his Roman name would serve—pronounced Jehovah’s judgment: Elymas would be temporarily blinded. This sign vindicated apostolic authority and the truth of the message. The blinding, fittingly ironic given Elymas’s spiritual blindness, led the proconsul to belief, being astonished at the teaching of the Lord rather than merely the sign. Luke’s emphasis upon doctrine over spectacle is deliberate. Miraculous signs authenticated the apostolic message during this foundational phase; they were never ends in themselves, nor models for a perpetual sign-centered ministry. The Word, not marvels, compelled Sergius Paulus.

Theologically, the Cyprus episode manifests the kingdom’s advance from synagogue to senatorial administration. The gospel addresses both Jewish expectation and Gentile governance with the same Christ-centered proclamation. The barrier is unbelief in any form—religious skepticism as well as occult distortion. Moreover, the short-term blinding of Elymas demonstrates that God’s judgments, even when severe, may be remedial and revelatory. Jehovah exposes spiritual darkness, disables obstruction, and opens doors for the truth.

Perga and Pisidian Antioch

From Paphos, Paul and his companions sailed to Perga in Pamphylia. Here John Mark returned to Jerusalem. Luke offers no polemic; later, Paul viewed the departure as a desertion from the work, while Barnabas continued to perceive usefulness in Mark. Scripture allows us to acknowledge disagreement among faithful men without relativizing truth. Years later, Paul esteemed Mark as useful for service, illustrating forgiveness, growth, and restored partnership in the gospel. The journey continued northward into the highlands of Pisidian Antioch, a Roman colony with strong imperial ties. The route demanded endurance and courage—mountain passes, shifting climates, and the ever-present reality of robbery along the roads. The missionaries’ perseverance models the apostolic pattern of endurance while refusing any self-glorifying heroism.

On the Sabbath, Paul and Barnabas entered the synagogue. After the reading of the Law and the Prophets, the synagogue rulers invited exhortation. Paul’s address stands as a paradigm of covenantal exposition rooted in Israel’s Scriptures and fulfilled in Jesus. He began with the patriarchs, proceeded through the Exodus and the judges to David, and presented Jesus as David’s promised Descendant. By recounting Jehovah’s acts—choosing the fathers, exalting the people in Egypt, leading them out with uplifted arm, giving judges, granting Saul, and raising up David—Paul located his message within Jehovah’s historical faithfulness. This survey is not a mere rehearsal of Israel’s story; it is a redemptive framework demonstrating that the promise to Abraham finds its realization in Jesus the Savior.

Paul underscored John the Baptizer’s preparatory ministry and the guilt of Jerusalem’s rulers who, not recognizing the voices of the prophets read every Sabbath, fulfilled those very prophecies by condemning Jesus. Paul announced Jesus’ sinless death, burial, and resurrection witnessed by chosen witnesses, and he declared the good news: through this Man, forgiveness is proclaimed, and by Him everyone who believes is justified from things that the Law of Moses could never justify. This is not antinomian proclamation; rather, it articulates the temporary, tutorial purpose of the Mosaic economy. The Law defined sin and guarded Israel until the Messiah, but it could not grant the forensic righteousness that God imputes through faith in Christ.

Paul sealed his appeal with a warning from the Prophets, urging the hearers not to despise the work of God. The reaction was initially favorable. Many begged that these matters be spoken again. The next Sabbath, nearly the whole city assembled, provoking jealousy among some Jewish leaders who contradicted and blasphemed. Paul and Barnabas responded that it was necessary to speak to Israel first, but since many thrust the message away, they would turn to the Gentiles, in fulfillment of Isaiah’s Servant prophecy—light to the nations, salvation to the ends of the earth. This is covenantal continuity without replacement. Israel’s Scriptures anticipated Gentile inclusion. Those appointed to eternal life believed, a statement that preserves both divine sovereignty and real human responsibility without collapsing into fatalism. Jehovah’s foreknowledge encompasses the free responses of individuals who embrace or reject the gospel. The Word spread, persecution arose, and the missionaries shook off the dust as a testimony, moving on while the new disciples were filled with joy and with the Holy Spirit’s Word-wrought assurance.

Iconium: Division and Perseverance

Iconium, an important city of Lycaonia or Phrygia depending on administrative boundaries, witnessed a similar pattern. Paul and Barnabas again entered the synagogue and spoke in such a way that a great multitude of Jews and Greeks believed. The phrase does not magnify rhetoric; it encapsulates Spirit-empowered exposition of Scripture, Christ’s fulfillment, and the call to repent and believe. Unbelieving Jews stirred up the Gentiles and poisoned their minds against the brothers. The missionaries remained for a considerable time, speaking boldly in reliance upon the Lord, Who bore witness to the word of His grace by granting signs and wonders to be done through their hands. These attesting signs, like those on Cyprus, were not showpieces but divine endorsements of the unique apostolic foundation.

The city became divided. Such division should not surprise those who proclaim Christ faithfully. The Word is a sword that exposes the thoughts of the heart. Hostility intensified as both Gentiles and Jews, together with their rulers, plotted mistreatment and stoning. Learning of the plot, the missionaries withdrew to the Lycaonian cities of Lystra and Derbe. Withdrawal in the face of lethal conspiracy is not cowardice. It accords with Christ’s instruction to flee to another city when persecuted, preserving life for further ministry and confounding the agenda of opponents without yielding ground theologically. Perseverance, for the apostles, was not reckless display but steadfast endurance guided by biblical prudence.

Lystra and Derbe: Miracles and Persecution

Lystra provides one of the most illuminating contrasts between biblical revelation and pagan misunderstanding. A man lame from birth listened as Paul preached. Perceiving that the man had faith to be made well, Paul cried, “Stand upright on your feet,” and the man leaped and walked. The miracle authenticated Christ’s authority mediated through His apostles and showcased the compassion of God, Who restores human weakness in anticipation of the resurrection life He promises to His people. Yet the crowd shouted in the Lycaonian language that the gods had come in human form. They named Barnabas “Zeus” and Paul “Hermes,” likely because Paul was the chief speaker. The priest of Zeus prepared oxen and garlands for sacrifice at the city gates.

This response discloses a deep hermeneutical divide. Pagan religion interprets divine power through myth and ritual; biblical faith interprets power through the Word of the living God. Paul and Barnabas rushed into the crowd, tearing their garments and crying out that they were merely men of like nature, calling the people to turn from worthless things to the living God, Who made the heaven and the earth and the sea and all that is in them. Here Paul delivers a classic piece of natural revelation theology, not as a full gospel summary but as a preparatory dismantling of idolatry. Jehovah’s providence in sending rain and fruitful seasons, satisfying hearts with food and gladness, witnesses to His goodness even in times when He allowed all nations to walk in their own ways. This does not contradict Israel’s election; rather, it shows that the Almighty never left Himself without testimony. Creation and providence leave humans without excuse; special revelation in Scripture and in Christ supplies the saving message that must be believed.

Even with such restraint, Paul and Barnabas scarcely restrained the crowds from sacrificing to them. Human beings, enslaved to idolatrous cravings, readily transform benefactors into deities. This episode warns the church against celebrity culture and against equating ministerial fruit with intrinsic greatness. All true service is derivative; all honor belongs to Jehovah.

Opponents from Antioch and Iconium arrived, turned the crowd, and stoned Paul, dragging him out of the city as if dead. The disciples gathered, and Paul rose and entered the city. The next day he and Barnabas departed to Derbe, where they proclaimed the gospel and made many disciples. Paul’s restoration, whether by ordinary recovery or extraordinary preservation, highlights that while death spreads to all because all sin, Jehovah rules over life and death and can preserve His servants for the work appointed to them. No doctrine of an immortal soul is required to make sense of Paul’s resilience; Scripture teaches that man is a soul, that death is the cessation of personhood pending resurrection, and that Jehovah alone bestows life. Paul’s continued ministry demonstrates commitment to the Word’s advance, not an appetite for spectacle.

Returning to Strengthen the Churches

After fruitful ministry in Derbe, Paul and Barnabas retraced their steps to Lystra, Iconium, and Pisidian Antioch. Their purpose was to strengthen the souls of the disciples, urging them to remain in the faith. The new congregations needed firm anchoring in sound doctrine, sober realism about suffering in a hostile world, and clear organization under biblically qualified leadership. Luke records that the apostles appointed elders for them in every congregation, with prayer and fasting, committing them to the Lord in whom they had believed. The plural “elders” for each congregation reflects a pattern of shared leadership by qualified men. There is no hint of female pastors or deacons; the pastoral epistles restrict these offices to qualified men and set stringent character and teaching requirements. The appointment process, accompanied by prayer and fasting, emphasizes dependence upon Jehovah’s wisdom and the recognition—not the creation—of those whom the Holy Spirit had made overseers through the Word’s qualifications.

This strengthening work included instruction in perseverance. Entry into the kingdom of God comes through many hardships in a fallen world ruled by sin, Satan, and demonic opposition. This statement does not glorify suffering, nor does it advocate a works-based entrance into life. Rather, it clarifies that the path of salvation is a journey of loyal faith, repentance, obedience, and hope sustained by the grace of God in Christ. Eternal life is a gift given by God; it is not a natural possession. The gift, however, is bestowed upon those who continue in the faith grounded and steadfast, not shifting from the hope of the gospel. The apostles urged believers to discard idolatry, immorality, and false teaching; to maintain congregational discipline; and to be diligent in Scripture, prayer, and evangelism.

The travel narrative continues through Pisidia to Pamphylia. In Perga they spoke the Word, then went down to Attalia, a coastal port facilitating the voyage back to Syria. The orderly and purposeful retracing underscores apostolic responsibility. Evangelism is not a matter of scattered sowing only; it requires pastoral care, doctrinal consolidation, and the raising up of local leaders so that each congregation becomes self-governing under Christ’s headship and Scripture’s sufficiency.

Reporting Back to Antioch

From Attalia they sailed to Antioch in Syria, where they had been committed to the grace of God for the work completed. Upon arrival, they gathered the congregation and reported all that God had done with them and how He had opened a door of faith to the Gentiles. The prepositions matter. God had done His work “with” them; they were instruments, not independent strategists. The result was not human triumph but divine accomplishment through faithful servants. The door of faith indicates that God grants opportunity and receptivity. Human responsibility is never negated; those who believed did so genuinely. Yet all fruit redounds to the grace of God.

The report to the sending congregation models accountability and shared joy. Missionaries are not freelancers; they are brothers under the oversight and fellowship of their home congregations. The Antioch report likely included doctrinal explanation of justification apart from the Mosaic Law for Gentiles, the rationale for synagogue-first preaching, the place of Old Testament prophecy in the Gentile mission, and the pattern of appointing elders. These themes prepared Antioch for the later dispute raised by some men from Judea who insisted upon circumcision for Gentile believers, a controversy addressed in the Jerusalem meeting that followed this journey.

The closing notice that Paul and Barnabas remained “no little time” with the disciples at Antioch signals a season of rest, teaching, and consolidation. The mission is not a sprint of constant movement but a rhythm of going, planting, strengthening, and reporting. The Word is central in each phase. Where Scripture is exposited carefully using the Historical-Grammatical method—considering authorial intent, grammar, context, and covenantal development—the church grows in stability and discernment. The result is missional clarity. The Abrahamic promise is fulfilled in Christ for Jew and Gentile. The Mosaic Law’s temporary guardianship gives way to justification by faith in the risen Messiah. The Spirit works through the inspired Word, not through chaotic phenomena. Congregations recognize and send qualified men. Elders are appointed in every church. The gospel advances amid hostility, yet Jehovah’s purpose stands.

The Theology of the Journey: Covenant, Law, Gospel, and Church Order

The first missionary journey teaches covenantal continuity without erasure. The promises to Abraham anticipate blessing to the nations through his Seed, Christ. The Law added four centuries later functioned as a guardian until Christ, not as a rival path to righteousness. In Pisidian Antioch, Paul drew this line clearly: forgiveness and justification come through Jesus to everyone who believes, from which the Law of Moses could never justify. This assertion neither nullifies the Law’s righteousness nor encourages moral laxity; rather, it establishes the Law by fulfilling it in Christ and inscribing its righteous requirements upon those who walk according to the Spirit’s teaching in the Word.

The journey also displays the right use of miraculous signs. They authenticated apostolic preaching at Cyprus, Iconium, and Lystra. Yet Luke repeatedly centers the response upon doctrine. Sergius Paulus believed, astonished at the teaching; the crowds in Pisidian Antioch begged for more teaching; and new disciples needed strengthening through teaching. Miracles never replace Scripture; they served, for a limited foundational period, as confirmatory witnesses to the apostolic message that has now been inscripturated in a text 99.99% accurate to the originals. The church today advances not by chasing spectacles but by faithful exposition and obedience.

Further, the journey underscores biblical church order. The elders appointed in every congregation are not cultural concessions but apostolic practice rooted in Scripture. Their primary charge is to teach sound doctrine and refute error, to shepherd the flock through the Word, and to model godliness. The presence of multiple elders per congregation promotes accountability, plurality, and stability. No text in Acts or the epistles introduces female pastors or deacons. The pattern is qualified men under Christ’s authority, serving not as lords but as examples.

Finally, the journey clarifies soteriology consistent with the whole counsel of God. The call to believe is universal; those who received the Word were appointed to eternal life, and their faith was real and responsible. Jehovah’s foreknowledge and human freedom are not enemies. He knows all possible choices and sovereignly orders history so that freely chosen responses accomplish His wise ends, without rendering those responses inevitable or coerced. Salvation, therefore, is a path of persevering faith and obedience in Christ, who died to atone for sin and rose to grant life. Eternal life is a gift to be received and held by continuing in the faith. The Spirit’s sanctifying work proceeds through the inspired Scriptures, not through ecstatic phenomena.

Exegetical Observations on Key Texts in Acts 13–14

Paul’s sermon in Pisidian Antioch builds upon the Davidic covenant and the prophetic testimony. When he says that God “raised up” David and later “raised up” Jesus, the verbal connection binds royal appointment and resurrection victory. The resurrection vindicates Jesus as the Holy One whose flesh did not see decay, fulfilling Psalm 16. The citations of Isaiah’s Servant language show that Gentile inclusion is not an afterthought but a central strand of Israel’s prophetic hope. Paul’s justification statement draws a clear line between the Law’s function and Christ’s saving achievement. The Law exposes guilt and instructs, but only the crucified and risen Messiah justifies.

In Lystra, Paul’s appeal to natural revelation mirrors the wisdom literature’s testimony that the heavens declare God’s glory and that His providence supplies the seasons and sustenance. This common-grace witness aims to redirect idolatrous worship to the living Creator, paving the way for preaching Christ crucified and risen. The miracle that precipitated the confusion becomes the occasion for clear teaching about the living God, Creator and Sustainer, as the theological foundation for proclaiming the Savior.

Throughout the journey, the pattern “Word preached, some believe, others oppose, the mission advances” displays the unbreakable chain of God’s purpose. The apostles neither measured success by immediate numbers nor retreated into silence when opposition arose. They reasoned from Scripture, appealed to conscience, corrected idolatry, and established durable congregational structures. The church’s joy and assurance are attributed to the Holy Spirit in the sense that the Spirit’s inspired Word and saving application produce objective confidence, not volatile emotionalism. Believers rejoiced because the message is true, Christ is risen, and Jehovah has opened a door for faith.

Missional Method and Contemporary Faithfulness

While the first missionary journey is unrepeatable in certain redemptive-historical aspects—apostolic office, confirming signs—it yields abiding principles. Mission begins and ends in the local congregation under the Word. Workers are recognized, commissioned with prayer, and held accountable through transparent reporting. The message is Scripture-saturated, Christ-centered, and covenantally coherent. Engagement begins where people already respect Scripture when possible, yet it also addresses the idolatry of the pagan mind by appealing to creation and conscience before presenting Christ directly. Opposition is inevitable; perseverance is essential; prudence dictates when to remain and when to withdraw. Newly formed congregations must not be abandoned; they require strengthening through doctrine and the appointment of qualified elders. The gospel advances not by novelty but by fidelity.

Paul’s first journey therefore presents an enduring template: proclaim the Messiah to the Jew first and also to the Greek; interpret all progress as the grace of God; rejoice that Jehovah opens doors; and labor until elders are in place and believers are grounded. This template honors covenantal continuity, magnifies Christ’s sufficiency, preserves human responsibility under divine sovereignty, and centers the Spirit’s work upon the inspired, inerrant Scriptures.

You May Also Enjoy

Christians: The Nature of Doubt

About the Author

CLICK LINKED IMAGE TO VISIT ONLINE STORE

CLICK TO SCROLL THROUGH OUR BOOKS