The long arc from Rome’s rise in the eastern Mediterranean to the shattering of Jerusalem in 70 C.E. forms one continuous stage on which Jehovah preserved His redemptive plan and, in the fullness of time, brought forth the Messiah. Political currents, imperial appointments, and construction projects were not random. They set the context for the birth, ministry, execution, and resurrection of Jesus Christ, and they also form the historical framework of the Acts narrative and the earliest decades of the Christian congregation’s expansion across the Roman world. This chapter traces that progression with careful attention to Scripture, to the dependable testimony of Josephus, and to archaeology that confirms rather than contradicts the biblical record. The Historical-Grammatical method clarifies the text and anchors it to the real places, rulers, and dates that Jehovah ordained, demonstrating the inerrancy and reliability of the Word of God.

The Rise of Rome and the Appointment of Herod as King of the Jews (Josephus, Antiquities XIV.14–XV.1; Wars I.14–17)

Rome’s consolidation of power in the East culminated in Pompey’s arrival during the Hasmonean civil war. In 63 B.C.E., Pompey entered Jerusalem amid the internecine conflict between Hyrcanus II and Aristobulus II. Rome’s involvement, initially presented as arbitration, became de facto sovereignty. Antipater the Idumean, a shrewd statesman and father of Herod, aligned with Rome and proved indispensable to Julius Caesar and then to the Roman administration that followed. Josephus records Antipater’s political genius and his ability to secure Roman favor, laying the foundation for Herod’s rise.

After the Parthian incursion in 40 B.C.E. drove Rome’s allies from Judea and enthroned Antigonus II Mattathias (a Hasmonean), the Roman Senate—guided by Mark Antony and Octavian—appointed Herod “King of the Jews.” Josephus recounts the Senate’s decree and the honorifics bestowed upon Herod at Rome. This was not a hollow title. With Roman backing and his own military discipline, Herod retook Jerusalem in 37 B.C.E. after a brutal siege, deposing Antigonus, who was subsequently executed. Herod’s ascent ended the Hasmonean dynasty and began a reign in which he would guard Rome’s interests while reshaping Judea’s political and architectural landscape. He navigated the transition from Antony to Octavian (Augustus) with remarkable dexterity, securing Augustus’s favor and therefore ensuring a stable throne.

Herod the Great’s Consolidation of Power and the Expansion of the Temple (Josephus, Antiquities XV.6–11; Luke 1:5)

Herod consolidated power by neutralizing rivals, restructuring the priesthood, and establishing a loyal administrative network. His marriage to the Hasmonean princess Mariamne briefly blended Idumean and Hasmonean lines, though later tragedies in his family are well known. To secure legitimacy among his Jewish subjects, Herod undertook massive building projects. These were not only proofs of regal magnificence but also instruments of political control and economic vitality.

At the center of this program stood the expansion of the Second Temple. Josephus notes that Herod, mindful of Jewish sensitivities, trained priests as masons and carpenters for work on the sacred precincts. He began the project in the eighteenth year of his reign (commonly set at 20/19 B.C.E.). The Temple sanctuary proper was completed with great speed, but the surrounding courts and colonnades continued for decades. This timeline accords with the statement reported during Jesus’ early ministry that “it has taken forty-six years to build this temple” (cf. John 2:20). The Temple Mount platform was vastly enlarged with enormous drafted-stone ashlars—the so-called “Herodian stones”—and the surrounding stairways, ritual immersion pools (mikva’ot), and gates reflect the thriving worship complex of the late Second Temple period. Luke’s simple historical notice—“In the days of Herod, king of Judea” (Luke 1:5)—sets the infancy narratives squarely within this Herodian milieu.

Herod’s achievements were not restricted to Jerusalem. He built Caesarea Maritima with its deep-water harbor (Sebastos), the desert fortress-palaces at Masada and Herodium, the Antonia Fortress abutting the Temple, and other projects that knit Judea firmly into the imperial economy. These constructions simultaneously advertised Herod’s allegiance to Augustus and strengthened the infrastructure by which Rome governed the province and surrounding client territories.

The Birth of Jesus Christ During Herod’s Reign (Matthew 2:1–23; Luke 2:1–20)

The Gospels anchor the birth of Jesus within Herod’s tenure. Matthew states plainly that Jesus was born “in Bethlehem of Judea in the days of Herod the king” (Matthew 2:1). This is further connected to Caesar Augustus’s administrative decrees recorded by Luke (Luke 2:1–5), which brought Joseph and Mary to Bethlehem, David’s city, in direct fulfillment of Micah 5:2. The virgin conception and birth were historical events, not theological constructs, and they occurred at the precise time Jehovah had set. The chronology rooted in the conservative evangelical timeline places Jesus’ birth around 2 B.C.E., in perfect harmony with the historical situation recorded by the Evangelists.

Herod’s character in the Gospel of Matthew accords with Josephus’s portrait of a suspicious and often ruthless monarch. The visit of the Magi, their inquiry about the “King of the Jews,” and the star Jehovah used to guide them led to Herod’s rage and his slaughter of the infant boys of Bethlehem. Joseph’s divinely directed flight with Mary and the Child to Egypt preserved the Messiah. These events do not reflect myth but concrete history, tracking with Herod’s well-attested jealousies and violent suppression of perceived rivals. Luke’s testimony to the humble circumstances of Jesus’ birth, the shepherds’ witness, and the presentation in the Temple frame the incarnation as Jehovah entering world history at a time of Roman census and Herodian rule, precisely as foretold.

Herod’s Death and the Division of His Kingdom Among His Sons (Josephus, Antiquities XVII.8; Matthew 2:19–22)

Herod’s final years were marked by domestic turbulence, executions within his household, and growing infirmity. Upon his death, his kingdom was divided in accordance with his final arrangements as ratified by Augustus. Josephus details the partition: Archelaus became ethnarch over Judea, Samaria, and Idumea; Herod Antipas became tetrarch over Galilee and Perea; Philip received the northeastern territories—Iturea, Trachonitis, Batanea, and Auranitis—as tetrarch. Matthew concisely aligns with this arrangement when Joseph, returning from Egypt, learns that Archelaus is ruling in Judea and, being warned, withdraws to Galilee where Antipas governed (Matthew 2:19–22). This movement into Galilee is the historically grounded pathway by which Jesus was raised in Nazareth, in complete fulfillment of prophetic contours.

Archelaus’s misrule led to complaints that reached Augustus, and in 6 C.E., Archelaus was deposed and banished. The ethnarchy of Judea thereby passed from Herodian to direct Roman administration through prefects and later procurators. This administrative shift is critical for situating the New Testament narrative, because it placed Judea under officials like Pontius Pilate by the time of Jesus’ ministry.

Roman Rule Through Procurators and Herod Antipas (Luke 3:1–2; Josephus, Antiquities XVIII.2–5)

With Archelaus removed, Judea was annexed to the Roman province of Syria and administered by Roman prefects (often colloquially called procurators). The earliest of these was Coponius. Over the next decades, several prefects governed, culminating with Pontius Pilate (26–36 C.E.), whose name is preserved on an inscription from Caesarea Maritima. Luke 3:1–2 situates the ministries of John the Baptist and Jesus amid a meticulously dated political framework—Tiberius Caesar, Pontius Pilate governor of Judea, Herod (Antipas) tetrarch of Galilee, Philip tetrarch of Iturea and Trachonitis, and Lysanias of Abilene—with the priestly pairing of Annas and Caiaphas. This is sober historiography, not theological embroidery. Luke’s precision is the hallmark of inspired accuracy.

Herod Antipas, the tetrarch of Galilee and Perea, played a significant role in the Gospel record. He built Tiberias on the western shore of the Sea of Galilee and exercised authority over the region where much of Jesus’ ministry unfolded. Antipas’s unlawful marriage to Herodias, and John the Baptist’s fearless denunciation of this immorality, resulted in John’s imprisonment and execution. Josephus corroborates Antipas’s governance and records the later conflict with Aretas IV of Nabatea—an event that frames Herod’s political weaknesses and helps explain the interplay between Roman oversight and client-king ambitions.

Pilate’s administration, as Josephus and Philo attest, included provocative acts—bringing Roman standards into Jerusalem, or expending sacred funds on public works—that inflamed Jewish sensibilities. Yet the Roman policy of allowing local elites to retain religious spheres of influence remained in effect. The Temple functioned, sacrifices continued, and the Sanhedrin retained authority in many local matters, though capital sentences required Roman sanction. This fusion of Roman sovereignty and local administration forms the legal background of Jesus’ crucifixion.

The Ministry of John the Baptist and the Beginning of Jesus’ Public Ministry (Matthew 3:1–17; Mark 1:1–15; Luke 3:1–22; John 1:19–51)

John the Baptist appeared in the wilderness as the final pre-Christian herald, “preparing the way” as Isaiah had foretold. His message was clear and uncompromising: repent, for the Kingdom of the heavens had drawn near. The baptism John performed was immersion, as the Greek baptizō demands. It was administered to repentant Jews who turned from sin in expectation of the Messiah. John’s setting along the Jordan and his straightforward call aligned with the broader Second Temple context in which ritual purifications were common and anticipatory. Yet John’s baptism was not a mere ritual; it was a prophetic summons grounded in Scripture and directed toward the Lamb of God.

Jesus came to John to be baptized, not for repentance, but to fulfill all righteousness and to identify Himself publicly with His saving mission to Israel. The heavens opened, the Holy Spirit descended upon Him, and the Father bore witness to the Son. From this divine commissioning, Jesus began His public ministry. Anchored in the conservative, literal chronology, the ministries of John and Jesus began in 29 C.E., in full accord with Luke’s synchronisms regarding Tiberius Caesar. This dating places the early Judean ministry, the Galilean ministry, and the climactic final Passover in a coherent timeline culminating at Nisan 14, 33 C.E.

Jesus’ Teaching and Miracles Amid Roman and Jewish Tension (Matthew–John)

Jesus ministered within a world where Roman soldiers patrolled roads, tax collectors farmed revenues, and the Sanhedrin navigated between fidelity to the Law and political survival. The Pharisees, Sadducees, and Herodians formed distinct groups with differing priorities. Pharisees emphasized meticulous adherence to oral traditions; Sadducees controlled Temple operations and were often aligned with the priestly aristocracy; Herodians supported the Herodian dynasty and its Roman alliance. Zealots advocated resistance to Rome, a sentiment that periodically erupted in violence. Into this complex field, Jesus proclaimed the Kingdom of God with divine authority.

His miracles—healings, exorcisms, command over nature, and even resurrections—were authentic works of power that authenticated His Person and message. He did not perform sensational displays; He demonstrated compassionate power, restoring broken bodies and liberating souls from demonic oppression. He interpreted the Mosaic Law in its original intent, exposing man-made traditions that obscured Jehovah’s commands. He called for faith, repentance, justice, mercy, and fidelity. The Sermon on the Mount established Kingdom righteousness; the parables clarified and concealed in line with prophetic purposes; and the Bread of Life discourse called Israel to Himself as the only true sustenance. The Son’s works and words bore the very imprint of Jehovah’s will, and the Scriptures were fulfilled in His obedience.

Roman presence threads through the narratives. Jesus healed a centurion’s servant and commended the centurion’s faith as surpassing that found in Israel. When challenged about the poll tax, He affirmed civil responsibility while reserving ultimate worship for Jehovah alone: “Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s and to God the things that are God’s.” He avoided entanglement in zealot ambitions, and He rejected messianic distortions. Yet He predicted Jerusalem’s desolation for rejecting Him and warned His disciples about days of tribulation that would come upon that generation, including specific instructions to flee when armies surrounded the city. These prophecies were not vague symbols; they unfolded with terrifying precision decades later.

The Trial and Execution of Jesus Under Pontius Pilate (Matthew 27:1–66; Mark 15:1–47; Luke 23:1–56; John 18:28–19:42)

The final Passover of Jesus’ ministry converged with the schemes of the religious authorities, who had already resolved to kill Him. After the night of fervent prayer and betrayal, Jesus was brought before the high priest and the Sanhedrin, where illegal proceedings sought a capital charge. Unable to execute Him themselves, they delivered Jesus to Pontius Pilate, framing the matter as sedition: claiming to be a king and therefore challenging Caesar. Pilate quickly discerned their envy, declared Jesus innocent multiple times, and attempted compromise by punishing and releasing Him. Yet political calculation and fear prevailed. Under pressure and the threat that sparing Jesus would mark him “no friend of Caesar,” Pilate condemned the Righteous One to crucifixion.

The Roman execution was public and brutal. Jesus was scourged, led to Golgotha, and nailed to the cross under the placard “Jesus of Nazareth, the King of the Jews,” written in Aramaic, Latin, and Greek. Soldiers cast lots for His garments, fulfilling Scripture. Darkness fell, the veil of the Temple was torn, and Jesus voluntarily yielded His spirit. The date, Nisan 14, 33 C.E., aligns with the typology of the Passover sacrifice and anchors the atonement in calendar time. Joseph of Arimathea and Nicodemus secured His body and placed it in a new tomb. Guards were stationed, but no human precautions can restrain the power of Jehovah.

The Resurrection and the Growth of the Early Church Under Roman Authority (Acts 1:1–8:40)

On the third day He rose bodily, an event attested by multiple eyewitnesses and by transformed lives. The risen Jesus instructed His disciples for forty days and ascended, promising empowerment to bear witness “in Jerusalem, and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the end of the earth.” At Pentecost, the Holy Spirit empowered the apostles with miraculous signs to authenticate the message, inaugurating the church’s public proclamation. The Spirit’s guidance today comes through the Spirit-inspired Word, yet in those foundational days, extraordinary manifestations authenticated the apostolic witness and laid the scriptural foundation.

Acts 1–8 presents the church’s explosive growth in Jerusalem. The apostles’ preaching centered on the crucified and risen Messiah, and thousands believed. The Jerusalem congregation demonstrated unity, generosity, and steadfast adherence to the apostles’ teaching. Opposition from the Sanhedrin arose quickly; Peter and John were arrested and warned; later, the apostles were flogged. Nonetheless, they continued to preach boldly. The seven were appointed to ensure equitable care for widows, and Stephen’s Spirit-empowered witness indicted Israel’s leadership for resisting Jehovah. His martyrdom triggered persecution that scattered believers through Judea and Samaria. Philip proclaimed Christ in Samaria, and the Ethiopian official believed and was immersed—again confirming that baptism is immersion and is for repentant believers, not infants.

Roman authority provides the broader protective canopy under which the gospel spread along imperial roads and through Greek-speaking synagogues. For a time the movement was viewed as part of Jewish life, permitting Christians to benefit from Judaism’s legal standing within the empire.

Roman Persecution and the Expansion of Christianity (Acts 9:1–28:31)

The persecutor Saul met the risen Jesus on the Damascus road, and through divine commission he became the apostle Paul. His calling was not the result of human tradition but of a direct mandate from the risen Lord. After a period of growth and preparation, Paul embarked on missionary journeys that carried the gospel deep into the Gentile world. The book of Acts records a series of engagements with Roman officials that are consistent with the legal realities of the day. Sergius Paulus, a Roman proconsul on Cyprus, believed the gospel; Gallio, the proconsul of Achaia, refused to adjudicate Jewish religious disputes and thereby set a practical precedent that Christianity was not automatically a civil crime. When mobs formed, Roman magistrates often restored order and, at times, protected missionaries from violence.

Herod Agrippa I persecuted the church in Jerusalem, executing James the son of Zebedee and imprisoning Peter. Yet Jehovah delivered Peter, and Agrippa’s own pride invited divine judgment. Paul’s later imprisonments under Felix and Festus, and his appeal to Caesar—as a Roman citizen—brought him at last to Rome itself. Acts closes with Paul proclaiming the Kingdom of God and teaching about the Lord Jesus Christ with boldness and without hindrance. The narrative demonstrates that while Rome could be hostile, Jehovah used Roman structures to carry the gospel farther than any purely local movement could have imagined. Even the praetorian guard and members of Caesar’s household heard the Word.

Jewish Revolts and the Growing Tension With Rome (Josephus, Antiquities XX.8–11; Wars II.17–18)

The simmering tensions that punctuated the mid-first century rose to a boil in the 60s C.E. Mismanagement by Roman officials and the volatile interplay of factions within Judea stoked the flames. Josephus recounts the greed and provocations of certain governors. Corruption, sacrilege, and brutality stirred outrage. The Zealots and the Zealot-adjacent Sicarii assassinated opponents, undermined peace, and fueled revolutionary fervor. Banditry and apocalyptic fervor mixed in toxic measure. The priestly aristocracy and moderate Pharisees were caught between resistance and appeasement, grasping for a path that would save the nation.

The immediate crisis erupted under Gessius Florus (64–66 C.E.). His theft of Temple funds and violent repression sparked widespread revolt. Sacrifices offered on behalf of the emperor ceased, a monumental break signaling open rebellion. The legion commanded by Cestius Gallus marched to quell the uprising but, after initial successes, withdrew in disarray. This victory emboldened revolutionaries and hardened positions. Rome, however, would not tolerate such insurrection. Nero appointed Vespasian to command the counteroffensive, with his son Titus as lieutenant. The methodical reconquest of Galilee and the crushing of strongholds set the stage for the siege of Jerusalem.

Jesus had foretold these days in precise language. In Matthew 24 and Luke 21, He warned of encircling armies, desolation, and destruction within that generation. He also instructed His disciples to flee to the mountains when they saw the city surrounded. The believers who heeded His words were preserved, for the Lord’s prophecies are certain and literal.

The First Jewish Revolt and the Siege of Jerusalem (Josephus, Wars IV–VI; Matthew 24:1–22; Luke 21:5–24)

Vespasian’s campaign dismantled the rebellion’s outer defenses. After Nero’s death and the brief chaos of 68–69 C.E., Vespasian secured the purple, becoming emperor and entrusting to Titus the final subjugation of Jerusalem. Inside the city, factions fought one another as much as the Romans. The Zealots and other groups vied for control, burned food stores, and murdered opponents. This internal warfare compounded famine and despair. Josephus, an eyewitness who had earlier been captured and then acted as an intermediary, laments the horrors within the walls—false prophets, bloodshed in the Temple courts, and the anguish of starvation.

The Roman legions encircled Jerusalem, constructed siege works, and pressed relentlessly. The city’s defenders fought desperately from the Temple precincts and the city’s walls. Titus sought surrender at various stages, but the radical elements refused. In this maelstrom, Jesus’ words came to pass: “not one stone shall be left upon another that will not be thrown down.” The abomination of desolation was not a mere symbol; the holy place was profaned as soldiers penetrated the sacred courts. The daily sacrifice ceased. Those who tried to escape faced crucifixion by the thousands. Josephus describes hundreds of crosses lining the approaches, a ghastly echo of the Roman terror visited upon the Son of God a generation earlier.

The famine reached such extremity that even unspeakable acts occurred—dire testimonies to the moral collapse that accompanies judgment. The city’s defenders, reduced to infighting amid the siege, were powerless against Rome’s disciplined war machine. In 70 C.E., the final breaches and conflagration put an end to organized resistance. The walls fell, the city was sacked, and the Temple was set ablaze.

The Destruction of the Second Temple by Titus (Josephus, Wars VI.4–10; 70 C.E.)

The destruction of the Second Temple in 70 C.E. under Titus is among the most consequential events in Jewish and world history. The Temple, whose courts Herod had magnificently expanded and whose sanctity anchored Jewish life, went up in flames. Whether or not Titus intended to preserve the sanctuary at an early stage, the reality remains: the Roman soldiers, enraged by resistance and carried by the momentum of the assault, set fire to the complex and tore it down. Gold from the Temple, melted by the heat, would have run into the crevices of the stones; in the aftermath, soldiers pried stones apart to retrieve it. Thus, stone by stone, the Temple was dismantled, fulfilling Jesus’ precise prophecy. The surviving Jewish population was slaughtered, enslaved, or scattered. The priesthood, sacrifices, and pilgrim festivals ceased. The center of gravity shifted from Temple to Torah schools, and rabbinic Judaism emerged in the vacuum left by the sacrificial system’s termination.

For the Christian congregation, the fall of Jerusalem vindicated Jesus’ forewarnings and further loosened the movement’s perceived dependence on the Jerusalem mother church. The gospel had already reached Rome. The apostles had already laid the foundation of doctrine. The church now continued to thrive across the empire through the proclamation of Christ crucified and risen, with congregational leadership centered in elders qualified by character and teaching, not by Levitical lineage. Jehovah preserved His people, and He will complete His purposes in the age to come, culminating in Christ’s return and His millennial reign. The Temple’s fall was judgment on a nation that rejected her Messiah, yet it also formed part of the divine plan by which the New Covenant—ratified by the blood of the Son—would be proclaimed to all nations.

Archaeological remains from this period illuminate the events without superseding Scripture. The Herodian ashlars in Jerusalem’s surviving platform courses, the monumental stairways and mikva’ot by the southern entrances, the pavement and street fragments buckled by collapsed stones, ossuaries from the period, and inscriptions confirming figures named in the New Testament and Josephus all align with the inspired record. None of this evidence stands above Scripture; it serves Scripture by showing the tangible world into which Jehovah spoke and acted. The stones cry out what the Gospels and Acts have already declared: Jesus is the Christ; His Word is true; His prophecy came to pass; and His Kingdom advances, not by the sword of men, but by the power of God’s unbreakable promises.

The Roman occupation thus frames a divinely orchestrated sequence: Herod’s appointment sets the stage; his Temple attests to both Jewish devotion and royal ambition; Jesus is born, ministers, and is crucified under Roman authority; He rises in power; the church expands amid Roman roads and courts; revolt comes; and Jerusalem falls. Through it all, the sovereignty of Jehovah shines. He guides rulers, appoints times, and ensures that His Word never fails. The history recounted by Josephus and confirmed by archaeology lives within and beneath the inspired narratives of Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, and Acts. The result is not merely the past; it is the theater of redemption—real places, real dates, real kings and governors—and the unwavering fulfillment of Jehovah’s plan in Jesus Christ.

You May Also Enjoy

The Tel Zayit Abecedary — c. 1020 B.C.E.

About the Author

CLICK LINKED IMAGE TO VISIT ONLINE STORE

CLICK TO SCROLL THROUGH OUR BOOKS