The Beni Hasan Tomb Paintings — c. 1870–1850 B.C.E.

Please Support the Bible Translation Work of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV)

$5.00

The tomb paintings of Beni Hasan in Middle Egypt stand among the most vivid archaeological testimonies to life during Egypt’s Middle Kingdom, particularly the Twelfth Dynasty (c. 1991–1786 B.C.E.). These mural scenes, preserved with remarkable clarity within rock-cut tombs overlooking the Nile near the modern village of Beni Hasan el-Qibli, provide invaluable insight into the customs, ethnic interactions, and societal order of the period. Of special biblical importance are the depictions of Semitic peoples entering Egypt, dated to c. 1870–1850 B.C.E., which coincide precisely with the time Jacob’s family settled in Egypt. Thus, the Beni Hasan murals offer historical and cultural corroboration of the Genesis record and illustrate the early presence of Asiatics in Egypt during the patriarchal era.

Archaeological Context and Setting

The necropolis of Beni Hasan lies approximately 160 miles (260 km) south of modern Cairo, near ancient Menat-Khufu (the “City of Khufu”). It served as the burial site for provincial governors (nomarchs) of the Oryx nome during Egypt’s Middle Kingdom. More than thirty major tombs, hewn into limestone cliffs, were constructed during the Eleventh and Twelfth Dynasties. Among these, the tombs of Khnumhotep II (Tomb 3) and Amenemhat (Tomb 2) are the most extensively decorated and historically significant.

The paintings within these tombs were executed with mineral pigments on plastered walls, employing a limited but vivid palette—red, yellow, green, blue, white, and black. These mural compositions display Egyptian daily life: agriculture, hunting, weaving, wrestling, religious rituals, and foreign trade. Yet one scene, in particular, from the tomb of Khnumhotep II, transcends all others in biblical relevance—a caravan of thirty-seven Semitic people entering Egypt, led by their patriarch-like figure named “Absha” (or “Abishai” in some transliterations). This depiction aligns closely with the historical background of the Hebrews’ arrival in Egypt as recorded in Genesis 46.

The Scene of the Asiatic Caravan

The Khnumhotep II painting portrays a group of foreigners bringing eye paint (antimony) and other goods as tribute or for trade. The Egyptian caption above them reads: “The arrival of the Asiatics bringing stibium.” These foreigners, identified in Egyptian as “Aamu” (Asiatics), wear multicolored garments distinct from Egyptian dress—long, patterned tunics reaching below the knees, bound with belts, and open sandals. The men wear beards and have lighter complexions compared to the Egyptians. Women and children accompany them, and they lead donkeys laden with goods, sheep, and goats.

This representation dates to the reign of Sesostris II (1897–1878 B.C.E.), or possibly early in the reign of Sesostris III (1878–1841 B.C.E.). Chronologically, this places the scene near 1870–1850 B.C.E., exactly the time when Jacob’s family of about seventy persons entered Egypt at Joseph’s invitation (Genesis 46:27; 47:1–6). Thus, this painting demonstrates that Semitic tribes were known to migrate into Egypt at that very historical period, confirming the plausibility and cultural background of the biblical narrative.

Ethnographic and Linguistic Identification

The inscription accompanying the mural identifies the leader of the caravan as “Absha,” rendered in hieroglyphs as 𓇋𓃀𓈙𓄿 (Absha or Abishai). Scholars have long recognized the Semitic character of this name, corresponding to Hebrew roots meaning “my father is a gift” (אבשי, Avshai). The group’s designation as “Aamu” (from ʿam—“people” in Semitic tongues) is the same Egyptian term used elsewhere for inhabitants of Canaan and Syria, precisely the regions from which the patriarchs migrated.

Their distinctive attire, skin tone, and beards are ethnographically consistent with early Northwest Semitic peoples. The men’s tunics are decorated with red, green, and blue stripes—an ancient pattern associated with Levantine textiles. Their donkeys carry packs, while women and children follow on foot, emphasizing a nomadic, patriarchal family structure typical of the Semitic tribes of Canaan. This image accords perfectly with the description of the patriarchs as tent-dwelling pastoralists who moved with their herds from region to region (Genesis 13:2–5; 26:12–25; 33:17–18).

The Middle Kingdom Context and Genesis Chronology

According to biblical chronology, Jacob entered Egypt in 1876 B.C.E., during the early Middle Kingdom. At that time, Egypt was a powerful and stable nation, unified under the Twelfth Dynasty after centuries of political division. The reign of Sesostris II corresponds to this biblical era. Joseph’s administrative role, described in Genesis 41–47, fits precisely within this environment of centralized government and organized irrigation projects, such as the excavation of the Bahr Yusuf canal—an enterprise traditionally attributed to the same Sesostris II. The Beni Hasan murals thus reflect not only the contemporaneous presence of Asiatics in Egypt but also the type of structured economy and bureaucratic oversight that would have made Joseph’s stewardship both necessary and historically credible.

Artistic Accuracy and Cultural Realism

Egyptian artists were meticulous recorders of social and ethnic distinction. Their conventions—though stylized—captured genuine differences in skin tone, dress, and physiognomy. The depiction of the Asiatics at Beni Hasan is therefore ethnographically accurate, not symbolic. The Asiatics’ lighter skin contrasts with the Egyptians’ reddish-brown hue; their beards differ from the clean-shaven Egyptians; their clothing features elaborate woven designs instead of the simple linen kilts of Egyptian men. These details affirm that the artists observed these foreign peoples firsthand.

The use of stibium (antimony) as a trade good corresponds with the ancient practice of kohl-eye paint, widely used in Egypt for cosmetic and medicinal purposes. As the caravan is shown presenting this substance to Khnumhotep II, it demonstrates established commercial relations between Egypt and the Levant—relations entirely consistent with the movement of Semitic peoples such as Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, whose livelihoods depended on trade, flocks, and migration.

Theological and Historical Implications

The Genesis account describes how famine in Canaan led Jacob’s family to seek sustenance in Egypt (Genesis 42:1–5). The Beni Hasan scene reveals that such migrations were not unique; Egypt was a land of plenty, attracting Semitic tribes who sought relief during periods of scarcity. Far from being mythological, the biblical record of Hebrews entering Egypt corresponds precisely with an established historical pattern attested in Egyptian art and inscriptions.

Moreover, the name “Absha” itself—bearing a Semitic structure and personal significance—illustrates that Egyptian scribes recorded authentic foreign names rather than imaginary types. The migration of these thirty-seven Asiatics thus exemplifies the same kind of movement described of Jacob’s household, which entered Egypt under Joseph’s guidance at about the same time. Therefore, the mural offers tangible archaeological confirmation that Semitic migrations into Egypt during the early second millennium B.C.E. were well-known and accurately portrayed.

Beni Hasan and the Semitic Presence in Egypt

The significance of the Beni Hasan paintings extends beyond a single caravan scene. Throughout the Middle Kingdom and into the Second Intermediate Period, Asiatics served as laborers, traders, soldiers, and officials in Egypt. The tombs of Beni Hasan, as provincial rather than royal burials, preserve a local record of these interactions, unaffected by the idealized art of royal monuments. This gives the scenes particular reliability for understanding Egypt’s social reality.

Archaeological evidence across Egypt—including stelae from Avaris (Tell el-Dab‘a) and papyri from Kahun—confirms the presence of Semitic peoples employed in various capacities. The Beni Hasan murals stand at the beginning of this long pattern of Hebrew and Semitic residence in Egypt, culminating centuries later in the enslavement of the Israelites under the later pharaohs before the Exodus of 1446 B.C.E.

Correlation With the Patriarchal Narratives

The Beni Hasan murals help to situate the patriarchal narratives of Genesis within a historically verifiable context. The patriarchs, living during the early second millennium B.C.E., interacted with Egypt at precisely the period depicted in these tombs. Abraham’s journey into Egypt (Genesis 12:10–20) occurred earlier, around 2080 B.C.E., and Jacob’s family entered around 1876 B.C.E.—just as such Semitic groups were recorded visually at Beni Hasan. This confirms that Egypt maintained open borders for pastoral nomads seeking trade or sustenance, a policy consistent with the favor shown to Joseph and his family by the Pharaoh of that age (Genesis 47:6).

Archaeological Reliability and Scriptural Harmony

The Beni Hasan paintings are not isolated artifacts but form part of a coherent archaeological pattern that consistently supports the accuracy of Scripture. They demonstrate that the social, economic, and political circumstances described in Genesis match the material culture of Middle Kingdom Egypt. The patriarchal narratives mention camels, donkeys, servants, and the exchange of goods such as balm, honey, gum, and myrrh—all commodities known from Middle Bronze Age trade. The caravan scene in Khnumhotep II’s tomb parallels these details precisely.

The veracity of the biblical record is thus undergirded by archaeological realism. The paintings from Beni Hasan were created not as later myth or memory but as contemporary documentation of real interactions between Egyptians and Semitic tribesmen. The correlation between the date (c. 1870–1850 B.C.E.), the appearance of the foreigners, their mode of travel, and the economic circumstances reflected in the murals all testify that the biblical story of Jacob’s migration to Egypt is grounded in historical reality.

APOSTOLIC FATHERS Lightfoot

Legacy and Preservation

The Beni Hasan tombs were first studied by early travelers such as John Gardner Wilkinson in the nineteenth century and later carefully documented by Percy E. Newberry in his 1893–1900 publication Beni Hasan. Modern conservation efforts have preserved these vibrant murals, allowing contemporary scholars and Bible students alike to view them as an enduring witness to the historical reliability of the Old Testament. Despite more than thirty-eight centuries of exposure, the colors and figures remain remarkably intact, preserving an ancient snapshot of life and faith intersecting in the cradle of civilization.

The Witness of the Stones

As Jesus declared, “If these kept silent, the stones would cry out” (Luke 19:40). Indeed, the stones of Beni Hasan cry out across millennia, confirming that the biblical record is not myth but history—living, tangible, and enduring. The patriarchs, the Semitic migrations, and the Egyptian background of Genesis 46–47 all stand vindicated by the chiseled walls and painted scenes of this Middle Kingdom necropolis. The Beni Hasan murals thus occupy a central place in biblical archaeology, providing both a cultural window and a historical witness to the era of the patriarchs.

You May Also Enjoy

The Role of the Hyksos in Egyptian History

About the Author

EDWARD D. ANDREWS (AS in Criminal Justice, BS in Religion, MA in Biblical Studies, and MDiv in Theology) is CEO and President of Christian Publishing House. He has authored over 220+ books. In addition, Andrews is the Chief Translator of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV).

CLICK LINKED IMAGE TO VISIT ONLINE STORE

CLICK TO SCROLL THROUGH OUR BOOKS

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress.com.

Up ↑

Discover more from Updated American Standard Version

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading