Please Support the Bible Translation Work of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV)
$5.00
 |
 |
 |
The Difficulty
Genesis 31:20 declares that “Jacob deceived Laban the Aramean by not telling him that he intended to flee.” Critics of the Bible often cite this passage to argue that Jacob behaved deceitfully, and yet God continued to bless him. The apparent moral tension is this: How could God favor a man who employed deception, even if under pressure? Was Jacob’s conduct dishonest, and if so, how could God’s blessing upon him remain consistent with divine righteousness?
To address this, we must examine both the textual and historical context of the narrative and the linguistic nuance of the Hebrew expression translated “deceived.” Only through a faithful application of the historical-grammatical method—the literal meaning of the text in its historical setting—can one discern that Jacob’s actions, far from being sinful deceit, were a prudent and faithful response to his unjust circumstances and God’s explicit command.
 |
 |
 |
The Context of Jacob’s Situation
Jacob had lived under the authority of his uncle and father-in-law, Laban, for twenty years. During that time, Jacob labored with unwavering diligence and loyalty. He served Laban for fourteen years to marry Leah and Rachel, and an additional six years for the flocks that became his own. Yet despite his faithfulness, Laban repeatedly exploited him, changing his wages “ten times” (Gen. 31:7) and manipulating circumstances to his own advantage.
Jacob’s testimony to his wives in Genesis 31:38–42 lays bare the extent of Laban’s abuse:
“These twenty years I have been with you; your ewes and your female goats have not miscarried, and I have not eaten the rams of your flocks. That which was torn by wild beasts I did not bring to you; I bore the loss of it myself… These twenty years I have been in your house; I served you fourteen years for your two daughters and six years for your flock, and you changed my wages ten times.”
The situation was one of systematic exploitation. Jacob’s work ethic and loyalty were met with greed and deceit. Laban’s household wealth increased because of Jehovah’s blessing upon Jacob, not because of Laban’s fairness (Gen. 30:27–30).
It was in this environment that Jehovah spoke to Jacob:
“Return to the land of your fathers and to your relatives, and I will be with you” (Gen. 31:3).
Thus, Jacob’s departure was not his own impulsive decision—it was obedience to a divine command.
 |
 |
 |
The Meaning of “Deceived” in Genesis 31:20
The phrase “Jacob deceived Laban” (Hebrew: wayyignob Yaʿaqōb ’eth-lēbh Lābān) literally reads “Jacob stole the heart of Laban.” The Hebrew idiom ganab lev (“to steal the heart”) carries a range of meanings depending on context. It can refer to deception, persuasion, or the act of diverting someone’s attention. It does not necessarily imply a moral falsehood, but may instead describe an act of strategic concealment.
For example:
-
In 2 Samuel 15:6, the same idiom is used of Absalom, who “stole the hearts of the men of Israel,” meaning he won their loyalty through persuasion, not literal theft or deliberate lying.
-
In Genesis 31:26–27, Laban himself interprets Jacob’s departure as “deceiving” him by leaving secretly, yet the Hebrew indicates that Jacob departed without telling him—an omission of notice, not a spoken falsehood.
Therefore, the meaning in Genesis 31:20 is that Jacob “outwitted” or “acted shrewdly” toward Laban by leaving without notification, not that he spoke deceit or bore false witness.
 |
 |
 |
The Reasonableness of Jacob’s Actions
Jacob’s choice to leave secretly was both reasonable and necessary. He feared Laban’s likely reaction, as the narrative makes clear:
“Jacob answered Laban, ‘I was afraid, because I thought you would take your daughters away from me by force’” (Gen. 31:31).
Jacob’s fear was well-founded. Laban’s manipulative nature had already been demonstrated through years of dishonest dealings. Moreover, when Jacob did depart, Laban pursued him with hostility and accused him of theft (Gen. 31:23–30), further confirming Jacob’s apprehension.
Thus, Jacob’s concealment was not malicious deceit; it was prudence born of experience. It protected his family and ensured obedience to God’s command. Had Jacob informed Laban of his intent, it is probable that Laban would have detained or hindered him, violating Jacob’s right to obey Jehovah’s directive.
 |
 |
 |
God’s Role and Jacob’s Obedience
Importantly, Genesis 31:3 reveals that Jehovah Himself initiated Jacob’s return:
“Then Jehovah said to Jacob, ‘Return to the land of your fathers and to your relatives, and I will be with you.’”
Jacob’s decision to act in secret was therefore an act of obedience to God’s revealed will. God’s command superseded human conventions of notice or protocol. The emphasis of the narrative is not on deceit, but on Jacob’s faithfulness amid oppression and his reliance upon divine direction rather than human permission.
When Laban later confronted Jacob, God intervened directly:
“Then God came to Laban the Aramean in a dream at night and said to him, ‘Be careful not to say anything to Jacob, either good or bad’” (Gen. 31:24).
Jehovah’s warning to Laban confirms that God was protecting Jacob’s decision and family. Laban’s intentions were likely hostile, yet God restrained him. This divine intervention validates that Jacob’s departure—though concealed—was approved by God.
 |
 |
 |
The Nature of Divine Blessing
Critics may ask: If Jacob’s action was less than ideal, why did God continue to bless him? The answer lies in God’s covenant faithfulness and the overall direction of Jacob’s life, not in sinless perfection.
Throughout Scripture, God’s blessing upon His servants is not the reward of moral flawlessness but the result of covenantal grace and faith-driven obedience. Abraham, Moses, and David each committed acts that could be judged as moral failures, yet God continued His work through them because their faith was genuine and their lives were oriented toward His promises.
-
Abraham temporarily deceived Pharaoh and Abimelech (Gen. 12:11–20; 20:1–18) out of fear, yet remained God’s chosen patriarch.
-
Moses struck the rock in disobedience (Num. 20:10–12), yet God still used him as the mediator of the Law.
-
David sinned grievously with Bathsheba, yet God preserved His covenant with him because David’s repentance was sincere.
In like manner, Jacob’s act was not rebellion but imperfect prudence under duress. His faith and obedience remained intact. God’s blessing, therefore, did not endorse deceit, but affirmed Jacob’s covenant role and protected him amid injustice.
 |
 |
 |
The Contrast Between Jacob and Laban
A key interpretive principle in Genesis is the contrast between Jacob the chosen and Laban the deceiver. Laban represents human greed and manipulation; Jacob represents the imperfect vessel through whom divine promises unfold.
While Jacob may have used shrewdness, his motives were consistent with righteousness—obedience to Jehovah and protection of his household. Laban’s deceit, by contrast, stemmed from covetousness and exploitation. The narrative does not equate their actions morally; it portrays Jacob’s conduct as defensive wisdom and Laban’s as selfish oppression.
When the two men finally part, Jacob makes a solemn covenant before Jehovah (Gen. 31:44–53). It is Laban—not Jacob—who swears by “the God of Nahor,” mixing pagan superstition with his oath (v. 53). Jacob, by contrast, swears “by the Fear of his father Isaac,” a reverent expression for Jehovah, showing his spiritual allegiance.
 |
 |
 |
The Broader Theological Implication
This episode illustrates how God’s providence operates amid human imperfection. Jehovah’s purposes move forward even through flawed human instruments. Jacob’s life was one of transformation—from a man of self-reliance to one who clings to God for blessing (Gen. 32:26). His journey exemplifies the process by which God disciplines, shapes, and fulfills His covenant promises through faith and perseverance.
Genesis 31:20, then, should not be read as a moral indictment but as a turning point in Jacob’s journey of faith. Having endured injustice, Jacob obeys God’s call, trusting that divine protection will sustain him. God’s blessing does not condone deceit but vindicates obedience.
The passage demonstrates that God is just in blessing Jacob, for His favor rests upon the faithful obedience of His servant and the unchanging covenant promises first made to Abraham. The blessing of God is rooted not in human perfection but in divine faithfulness.
 |
 |
 |
Summary of the Apologetic Defense
-
The Hebrew expression “stole the heart of Laban” signifies strategic concealment, not moral deceit.
-
Jacob’s secrecy was a rational, defensive measure against a deceitful and oppressive master.
-
God commanded Jacob to return to Canaan, making his action an act of obedience, not rebellion.
-
God’s blessing upon Jacob affirms His covenant faithfulness, not moral approval of every human act.
-
Laban’s conduct throughout the narrative validates Jacob’s fear and vindicates his departure.
-
The narrative’s focus is not on deceit but on divine providence and covenant preservation.
You May Also Enjoy
About the Author
CLICK LINKED IMAGE TO VISIT ONLINE STORE
Leave a Reply