Introduction: The Centrality of Miracles in the Biblical Narrative

The entire structure of the Bible assumes and is constructed upon the reality of divine miracles. From the creation account in Genesis 1:1 to the resurrection of Jesus Christ in the Gospels and the apocalyptic visions of Revelation, the miraculous is not a peripheral theme but a foundational one. If biblical miracles are false or exaggerated, the authority and reliability of Scripture collapse. Therefore, determining whether there is sufficient evidence to believe in biblical miracles is a question that sits at the core of Christian apologetics. This article provides an objective, rational, and historically grounded examination from a conservative evangelical perspective that upholds biblical inerrancy and uses a literal-grammatical hermeneutic.

Defining a Biblical Miracle: Not Merely the Unusual

A miracle in Scripture is not simply an anomaly or an unexplained phenomenon. Biblical miracles are defined as acts of God that defy natural explanation and are performed with a specific divine purpose. These are not random events but deliberate intrusions of God’s power into the natural world to reveal His will, validate His messengers, or bring about His purposes. For example, the parting of the Red Sea (Exodus 14:21–22) was not merely a meteorological coincidence; it was a direct intervention of Jehovah in response to Moses’ obedience.

The Presuppositional Foundation of Miracles: A Theistic Universe

Any investigation into the plausibility of biblical miracles must begin with the presupposition that the God described in Scripture exists. If an all-powerful, all-knowing, sovereign Creator exists (Genesis 1:1; Isaiah 40:26; Romans 1:20), then miracles are not only possible but expected. To argue against miracles from a naturalistic worldview is circular and invalid, for it dismisses the possibility of divine action a priori. The biblical worldview asserts that Jehovah is not constrained by natural laws—He created them (Jeremiah 32:17). Therefore, the occurrence of miracles fits consistently within the theological structure of Scripture.

Eyewitness Testimony: The Primary Evidence for Miracles

The most compelling form of historical evidence is multiple independent eyewitness testimonies. Scripture abounds with such accounts, recorded within living memory of the events they describe.

For instance, the miracles of Jesus are not vague myths handed down over centuries. They were documented by eyewitnesses or those closely associated with eyewitnesses. The Gospels, written between 41 C.E. and 98 C.E., fall within the lifespans of individuals who could confirm or contest their content. The feeding of the 5,000 (Matthew 14:13–21), healing of the blind (John 9), and Jesus walking on water (John 6:16–21) were all witnessed by multiple disciples and others.

The resurrection of Jesus—by far the most critical miracle—is testified to by over 500 individuals at once (1 Corinthians 15:6), most of whom were still alive when Paul wrote to the Corinthian church in 55 C.E. These eyewitnesses had no incentive to lie, and many suffered and died for their testimony.

Historical Reliability of the Bible: Trusting the Sources

To evaluate whether miracles occurred, one must consider the trustworthiness of the documents that record them. The historical reliability of the Bible, both Old and New Testaments, has been thoroughly established.

For the Old Testament, the accuracy of the Masoretic Text (MT) has been substantiated by the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls (dated 250 B.C.E.–50 C.E.), which show remarkably minimal differences when compared to the MT. The precision of scribal transmission, particularly among the Jewish copyists, is a strong argument in favor of textual preservation. Therefore, when Exodus 14 describes the parting of the Red Sea, or 1 Kings 18 details Elijah’s calling down of fire from heaven, we are dealing with a text that has been reliably transmitted.

For the New Testament, the manuscript evidence is overwhelming. With over 5,800 Greek manuscripts, 10,000 Latin manuscripts, and over 9,000 others, the New Testament text is more attested than any other work from antiquity. The time gap between the original autographs and our earliest manuscripts is small, often less than 100 years. This reliability strengthens the case that the miracles recorded were not later inventions but reflections of actual events.

Internal Consistency and Corroboration Among Sources

The miracle accounts in Scripture are consistent across different authors, writing to different audiences, at different times. The Gospels, though written by Matthew (c. 41–45 C.E.), Mark (c. 60–65 C.E.), Luke (c. 56–58 C.E.), and John (98 C.E.), demonstrate remarkable internal consistency regarding the miraculous deeds of Jesus. Though the authors include different details, this variation without contradiction is the hallmark of genuine eyewitness testimony. If all four Gospels were identical, that would suggest collusion, not authenticity.

Moreover, archaeological findings frequently corroborate the historical settings of the biblical miracles. The Pool of Bethesda (John 5:2), once considered fictional, has been discovered precisely as described. The location of Sodom and Gomorrah (Genesis 19) shows evidence of sudden, intense fire consistent with the biblical account. While archaeology cannot prove miracles per se, it does confirm the reliability of the biblical framework in which these miracles are situated.

Fulfilled Prophecy: Miracles Through Predictive Accuracy

One type of miracle that continues to offer verifiable evidence is predictive prophecy. These are not vague or general predictions but specific prophecies fulfilled in time and history. For example, Isaiah 44:28 and 45:1 named Cyrus as the one who would allow the Jews to return and rebuild Jerusalem, over 150 years before Cyrus conquered Babylon in 539 B.C.E. and issued his decree in 538 B.C.E. (cf. Ezra 1:1–4). The statistical probability of such accuracy apart from divine revelation is negligible.

Daniel’s prophecy of the four successive empires (Babylon, Medo-Persia, Greece, and Rome) in Daniel 2 and 7 provides another miraculous confirmation, written in the sixth century B.C.E., long before the rise of Rome. These prophecies not only demonstrate divine foreknowledge but are also confirmed by secular historical records.

The Resurrection of Jesus: The Linchpin Miracle

All New Testament miracles culminate in the resurrection of Jesus Christ. If this miracle stands, then all others become plausible. The resurrection is unique in that it is not merely an internal or spiritual experience but a physical event witnessed by numerous people and recorded by multiple sources.

Attempts to explain away the resurrection—swoon theory, hallucination theory, stolen body theory—fail under historical scrutiny. Roman execution was final and brutal; no one survived crucifixion (John 19:33–34). Hallucinations do not occur in group settings and do not last for weeks. The disciples had no motive to fabricate the resurrection, given their sufferings. Moreover, Jesus’ tomb was found empty by women—an unlikely invention, as female testimony had low credibility in first-century Judaism.

The conversion of Paul (Acts 9), a Pharisee and persecutor of Christians, to a follower of Christ after claiming to have seen the risen Jesus is strong corroborative evidence. Paul was a contemporary and intellectual peer of the apostles, and his life-altering change has no rational explanation apart from an authentic encounter with the risen Christ.

Miracles in the Old Testament: Rooted in Redemptive History

Old Testament miracles were not haphazard. They occurred at key redemptive historical moments. The ten plagues on Egypt (Exodus 7–12), the crossing of the Red Sea (Exodus 14), and the manna from heaven (Exodus 16) were all strategic revelations of God’s power to deliver His people and judge wicked nations.

These events were not performed in secret but in full public view. The plagues affected all of Egypt, and the Red Sea crossing was witnessed by an entire nation. The pillar of fire and cloud (Exodus 13:21–22) was visible daily. Such phenomena cannot be explained by illusion, imagination, or myth-making.

Counterfeit Miracles: Acknowledging Deception without Denial

The Bible itself acknowledges the existence of counterfeit miracles (Exodus 7:11–12; Matthew 24:24; 2 Thessalonians 2:9), which strengthens rather than weakens its credibility. It distinguishes between true divine miracles and those performed by demonic or deceptive means. This acknowledgment proves that biblical authors were not gullible or indiscriminate, but discerning. The real concern is not whether miracles can occur, but their source and purpose.

Philosophical Objections: Answering Hume and Naturalism

The primary philosophical argument against miracles comes from David Hume, who claimed that uniform human experience is against miracles. But this is fallacious. Hume’s argument assumes what it seeks to prove—that miracles do not happen—based on an unproven commitment to naturalism. Furthermore, Hume had no access to all human experience, past or present.

Moreover, many events we accept today—such as the origin of the universe from nothing or the sudden beginning of life—are themselves miraculous from a naturalistic standpoint. If naturalists accept these unexplained phenomena, they cannot consistently deny biblical miracles out of hand.

Theological Necessity of Miracles: Not Just Proof, But Revelation

Miracles in Scripture are not mere spectacles but are intrinsically tied to revelation. They are God’s authentication of His message and messengers. When Elijah called down fire from heaven (1 Kings 18), it was to prove that Jehovah alone is God. When Jesus healed the paralytic (Mark 2:1–12), it was to prove His authority to forgive sins. The resurrection was not just proof of life after death; it was God’s declaration that Jesus is Lord and Judge (Acts 17:31).

Conclusion: A Rational Foundation for Belief in Biblical Miracles

In sum, belief in biblical miracles is not grounded in wishful thinking or blind faith but in verifiable historical evidence, consistent eyewitness testimony, textual reliability, archaeological corroboration, fulfilled prophecy, and theological coherence. Given the existence of the sovereign Creator, Jehovah, who interacts purposefully with His creation, the miraculous accounts of Scripture are not only believable—they are expected.

You May Also Enjoy

Are Miracles In the Bible Possible, Probable, or Certain to Have Happened?

About the Author

CLICK LINKED IMAGE TO VISIT ONLINE STORE

CLICK TO SCROLL THROUGH OUR BOOKS