
Please Support the Bible Translation Work of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV)
$5.00
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Athenagoras of Athens, active in the latter half of the second century C.E., was one of the most articulate and philosophically trained defenders of the Christian faith among the early apologists. Known for his “Apology” or “Embassy for the Christians” (written around 177 C.E.) addressed to the Roman emperors Marcus Aurelius and his son Commodus, and for his later treatise “On the Resurrection of the Dead,” Athenagoras offered systematic and reasoned responses to prevalent accusations against Christians in the Roman Empire. These included charges of atheism, incest, and cannibalism—each a distortion or misunderstanding of Christian doctrine and practice. What distinguishes Athenagoras is his intellectual precision and his robust defense of the monotheistic and Trinitarian doctrine of God, the resurrection of the body, and the moral integrity of Christian believers.
Historical Context and Conversion
Athenagoras flourished during a time when Christians were frequently maligned and persecuted. Roman suspicion of the new sect was intensified by their refusal to worship the emperor or the Roman pantheon, their secretive meetings, and their unique theological claims. It was in this setting that Athenagoras converted to Christianity. According to Philip Sidetes, writing in the sixth century, Athenagoras was initially motivated to study the Scriptures to refute them but was convinced of their truth instead. This conversion underlies his works, which reflect not only a firm grasp of Scripture but also a profound philosophical training—likely in the Platonic tradition, although he does not slavishly follow any single Greek school.
Athenagoras’s influence was notable. Methodius of Olympus (d. 311 C.E.) later adopted his reasoning in “On the Resurrection of the Body,” demonstrating Athenagoras’s intellectual legacy. Yet strangely, he is omitted by Eusebius of Caesarea, the early fourth-century church historian, a silence which scholars still find inexplicable given Athenagoras’s theological and literary significance.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Apologetic Method and Philosophical Engagement
Athenagoras’s apologetic method represents a turning point in the development of early Christian defense literature. He integrates rigorous philosophical reasoning with biblical truths, anticipating later apologetic frameworks that emphasize moral, theological, and rational coherence.
In “Embassy for the Christians,” Athenagoras begins by dismantling the accusation that Christians are atheists. This charge was based on the Christians’ refusal to honor the Roman gods or offer sacrifices to the emperor. Athenagoras replied, “we distinguish God from matter, and teach that matter is one thing and God another, and that they are separated by a wide interval (for that the Deity is uncreated and eternal … while matter is created and perishable).” His ontological distinction between the Creator and creation not only rejects pantheism but establishes the Christian God as transcendent, eternal, and immaterial—classic theism grounded in biblical revelation.
Athenagoras also targets polytheism’s internal contradictions. He asks, “If there were from the beginning two or more gods, they were either in one and the same place, or each of them separately in his own… But if, on the contrary, each of them exists separately, since He that made the world is above the things created … where can the other or the rest be?” This argument undercuts polytheism’s coherence by highlighting the logical impossibility of multiple deities coexisting within the framework of a created, ordered universe.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Trinitarian Theology and Logos Doctrine
Though the formal doctrine of the Trinity was not articulated in full until the fourth century, Athenagoras’s writings already exhibit essential Trinitarian elements rooted in Scripture. He affirms the tri-personal nature of the one true God: “We acknowledge also a Son of God… The Holy Spirit Himself also … we assert to be an effluence of God.” Thus, Athenagoras can “speak of God the Father, and of God the Son, and of the Holy Spirit.” This theological formulation rejects modalism and tritheism alike, presenting a unified divine essence with personal distinctions.
His Logos doctrine is especially significant. “The Father had the logos in Himself from eternity… Hence the Logos was begotten of the Father, but ‘not as having been brought into existence.’” Here, Athenagoras avoids both subordinationism and ontological division. The Son is eternally preexistent and consubstantial with the Father, through whom all things were made—aligning with John 1:1–3 and Colossians 1:15–17.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Creation and the Creator-Creation Distinction
Athenagoras repeatedly emphasized the uncreated nature of God and the created, contingent status of the universe. “The Deity is uncreated and eternal … while matter is created and perishable,” he writes. This metaphysical distinction is crucial not only for his theology of God but also for his critique of idolatry. He notes the absurdity of worshiping created things—whether idols of wood and stone or the sun and stars—when the Creator transcends and sustains all.
He writes, “I admire its beauty, and adore the Artificer,” emphasizing that while creation reflects divine craftsmanship, it is not to be deified. This is consistent with Romans 1:25, where Paul condemns those who “worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator.”
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Defense Against Charges of Cannibalism and Incest
One of the more grotesque accusations against early Christians was cannibalism, based on a misunderstanding of the Eucharist, and incest, derived from Christians’ use of familial terms like “brother” and “sister” and their private meetings. Athenagoras refutes both with clarity.
Addressing the cannibalism charge, he asks, “Who, then, that believes in a resurrection, would make himself into a tomb for bodies that will rise again?” The logic is sound: no one who believes in the sanctity and future resurrection of the body would consume human flesh. As for incest, Athenagoras appeals to the moral purity of Christians, whose conduct, he argues, surpasses that of their pagan neighbors.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
View of Scripture and Prophetic Inspiration
Athenagoras holds the Scriptures in the highest regard, affirming their divine origin and prophetic authority. He writes, “It would be irrational for us to cease to believe in the Spirit from God, who moved the mouths of the prophets like musical instruments.” He compares the prophets to instruments played by God, indicating a strong view of verbal inspiration, akin to 2 Timothy 3:16, which says, “All Scripture is inspired by God.”
He affirms both the Hebrew prophets and the role of the Holy Spirit in their writings: “The writings either of Moses or of Isaiah and Jeremiah and the other prophets… were inspired, the Spirit making use of them as a flute player breathes into a flute.” This model of inspiration reflects a robust pneumatology in harmony with the doctrine of inerrancy—Scripture as the very Word of God conveyed through human vessels.
The Physical Resurrection of the Dead
Athenagoras’s treatise “On the Resurrection of the Dead” stands as one of the earliest and most thorough defenses of bodily resurrection. He argues not for a mere spiritual afterlife but for the literal, physical resurrection of the same material body that died—affirming the continuity of identity and the justice of God’s judgment.
He writes, “It is not possible for God to be ignorant, either of the nature of the bodies that are to be raised… although to me it may appear quite impossible.” Athenagoras thus admits the resurrection appears impossible by natural reasoning, but he appeals to the omniscience and omnipotence of God, who is more than capable of reassembling every particle of the body.
He declares that humans, consisting of body and soul, cannot be complete unless both are restored: “Man, therefore, who consists of the two parts [body and soul], must continue forever. But it is impossible for him to continue unless he rise again.” Judgment, he argues, must include the body, for the deeds of the flesh are what God judges (2 Corinthians 5:10).
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Evaluation and Contribution
Athenagoras represents a synthesis of rigorous philosophical inquiry and theological depth. His works remain vital for understanding the early church’s defense of the faith in a hostile intellectual and political climate. He affirms the foundational doctrines of Christian orthodoxy: monotheism, the Trinity, creation ex nihilo, the inerrancy and inspiration of Scripture, the moral distinctiveness of Christian life, and the bodily resurrection.
His appeal to logic, moral conduct, and theological coherence set a pattern for later apologists, and his clarity in articulating the doctrines of God and the resurrection serves as a model for addressing skeptical and hostile audiences with biblical and rational conviction.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
You May Also Enjoy
Atheism: A Critical Biblical and Philosophical Analysis



























Leave a Reply