Paul’s declaration in Romans 10:4 strikes at the core of covenantal transition in redemptive history:

“For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to everyone who believes.”

The word translated “end” here is τέλος (telos), meaning goal, conclusion, or termination. It conveys both purpose and cessation. Christ is not merely the law’s fulfillment in a generic sense—he is the terminus of its covenantal function in relation to righteousness. The Mosaic law, with its commands, rituals, and covenant stipulations, finds its complete cessation as a path to righteousness in the arrival of Jesus the Messiah.

This is the unavoidable theological implication: Christ marks the conclusion of the Mosaic covenant as a binding system of righteousness for God’s people. From the divine standpoint, its role is complete. From the human standpoint, it must no longer be appealed to for covenant standing or moral justification. Righteousness is no longer mediated through νόμος (law), but solely through πίστις Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ (faith in Jesus Christ)—a covenantal allegiance grounded in trust, not law-keeping.

Paul’s argument in Galatians 2:16–21 reinforces and expands this point. Three times in verse 16, he stresses that no one is justified by “works of the law” but through “faith in Christ Jesus”:

“Yet we know that a person is not justified by works of the law but through faith in Jesus Christ… because by works of the law no one will be justified.” (Galatians 2:16)

This rejection is categorical and unqualified. The works of the Mosaic law—whether circumcision, dietary laws, Sabbath observance, or sacrificial rituals—are excluded as covenantal requirements under the new arrangement. Paul isn’t contrasting law with grace in abstraction; he is asserting that the law-covenant has ceased to function as the framework of divine relationship. To return to it is to reject Christ’s sufficiency.

Paul then presses the theological logic further: if he were to rebuild what he tore down—the system of justification by law—he would make himself a transgressor (Galatians 2:18). Why? Because to attempt righteousness through the law now is to deny the efficacy of Christ’s death:

“I do not nullify the grace of God, for if righteousness were through the law, then Christ died for no purpose.” (Galatians 2:21)

This is not merely a contrast in emphasis, but a covenantal discontinuity. The law is no longer in force because Christ has fulfilled its demands, absorbed its curse (Galatians 3:13), and introduced a new mode of covenantal identity—cruciform union with him by faith.

“I have been crucified with Christ. It is no longer I who live, but Christ who lives in me…” (Galatians 2:20)

This union replaces external law observance with internal transformation, mediated by the Spirit and grounded in the death and resurrection of Christ. The former covenant had temporal and preparatory purposes; the new covenant is permanent, Spirit-empowered, and Christ-centered.

Therefore, Paul’s theology does not allow for dual-covenant systems or a hybrid model. The law’s pedagogical function has ended, its ritual obligations terminated, and its covenantal authority superseded by the greater glory of the gospel. To live under the law now is not only futile—it is spiritually regressive and theologically incoherent in light of Christ’s redemptive work.

In sum, Christ is the telos—the fulfillment and cessation—of the Mosaic law as a system of righteousness. With his arrival, the covenant structure rooted in Sinai is no longer operative. Righteousness, life, and identity with God are now located solely in Christ, apart from the law, through obedient faith.

You May Also Enjoy

Colossians 3:9 — A Command Against Lying in the Context of the New Man in Christ

About the Author

CLICK LINKED IMAGE TO VISIT ONLINE STORE

CLICK TO SCROLL THROUGH OUR BOOKS