Relativism: The Collapse of Moral and Epistemological Absolutes and the Biblical Response

Please Support the Bible Translation Work of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV)

$5.00

Introduction: The Challenge of Relativism to Biblical Authority

Relativism—the belief that truth, morality, and knowledge are not objective or absolute, but vary based on culture, perspective, or individual preference—has become one of the most dominant philosophies in the modern Western world. It manifests in both epistemological and moral forms, asserting that either knowledge or ethical values are context-dependent. In direct opposition to the Bible’s claim to universal, objective, and unchanging truth, relativism undermines every foundation of Christian doctrine, ethics, and apologetics.

The rise of relativism is not a mere philosophical trend; it is a full-scale ideological assault on the absolute authority of Scripture, the exclusivity of the gospel, and the objective nature of morality as revealed by God. In this article, we will analyze the roots of relativism, its various forms, its philosophical inconsistencies, its sociocultural implications, and the clear and uncompromising biblical response to it.

The Historical and Philosophical Roots of Relativism

The idea of relativism is not new. It can be traced back to the Sophists of ancient Greece, particularly Protagoras (c. 490–420 B.C.E.), who famously claimed, “Man is the measure of all things.” This proposition laid the groundwork for the notion that truth is determined by the individual. The Sophists were opposed by philosophers like Socrates and Plato, who defended objective truth and the knowability of moral realities.

Relativism gained new life in the Enlightenment and post-Enlightenment periods. David Hume’s skepticism, Immanuel Kant’s division of the noumenal and phenomenal realms, and Friedrich Nietzsche’s nihilism all contributed to the erosion of confidence in objective truth. The 20th century saw the explosion of relativism in various domains: linguistic relativism (via Wittgenstein and post-structuralists), moral relativism (via existentialists like Sartre), and cultural relativism (via anthropologists like Ruth Benedict and Margaret Mead).

In the late 20th and early 21st centuries, postmodernism institutionalized relativism in academia, media, and public discourse. Claims like “what’s true for you may not be true for me,” and “no one has a monopoly on truth,” became mainstream expressions of this ideology. However, each iteration of relativism, when examined carefully, proves to be not only philosophically self-defeating but also ethically and theologically catastrophic.

Defining the Forms of Relativism

Epistemological Relativism holds that knowledge and truth are relative to individuals or cultures. In this view, there are no absolute truths—only truths conditioned by historical, linguistic, or societal frameworks. Statements such as “There is no objective truth” or “All truth is relative” typify this position.

Moral Relativism argues that what is morally right or wrong depends on cultural norms or personal preferences, not any universal standard. What is murder in one society may be honorable justice in another; what is sexual immorality in one era may be liberation in another.

Religious Relativism posits that no single religion has exclusive access to spiritual truth. Jesus Christ may be “a” way for some, but not “the” way for all. It is typified in statements like, “All religions lead to the same God,” or “Each person must find their own spiritual path.”

Each of these types directly contradicts the biblical worldview, which affirms the existence of absolute, objective, and universal truth grounded in the unchanging nature of God (Malachi 3:6; John 14:6; Psalm 119:160).

The Logical and Philosophical Incoherence of Relativism

Relativism is self-refuting. Consider the statement: “All truth is relative.” If that statement is absolutely true, then it contradicts itself by making an absolute claim. If it is only relatively true, then it holds no universal weight and collapses into meaninglessness. The assertion destroys itself.

Moreover, relativism cannot account for basic rational discourse. Every argument assumes the existence of fixed laws of logic—non-contradiction, identity, and excluded middle—which are by nature universal and unchanging. If relativism were true, even logic would be culture-bound or subjective, rendering communication incoherent.

Relativism also cannot make moral judgments consistently. If all morality is relative, then one cannot condemn genocide, slavery, child abuse, or racism as universally wrong. Yet relativists instinctively decry injustice. This reveals that they smuggle moral absolutes into their worldview while denying their source.

In practice, relativism reduces to power dynamics. Without objective truth, “truth” becomes whatever is enforced by the most influential. This is what Nietzsche anticipated in his “will to power” philosophy. The result is not tolerance, as relativism promises, but tyranny, where subjective truth becomes lawless imposition.

The Biblical Response to Relativism

Scripture affirms repeatedly that truth is objective, rooted in the very nature and character of God. Jesus did not claim to be one possible guide to truth; He declared, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me” (John 14:6). This is an exclusive, universal, and objective statement.

The Bible presents truth not as a shifting human construct but as eternal. Psalm 119:89 states, “Your word, Jehovah, is eternal; it stands firm in the heavens.” Jesus prayed to the Father, “Sanctify them by the truth; your word is truth” (John 17:17). Truth is not subjective—it is grounded in God’s nature and revealed in His Word.

Moral truths are also absolute. The Ten Commandments (Exodus 20:1–17) are not subject to cultural reinterpretation. Adultery, theft, murder, and false witness are not wrong in one culture and right in another—they are objectively wrong because they violate the moral nature of God.

Moreover, Scripture condemns moral relativism explicitly. In Judges 21:25, we read: “In those days there was no king in Israel; everyone did whatever seemed right in his own eyes.” This is not commendation but condemnation of societal collapse into relativistic anarchy.

Romans 1:18–32 describes the moral and intellectual decay that results from suppressing the truth of God in unrighteousness. It leads to idolatry, sexual immorality, and a depraved mind. Relativism, by denying God’s truth, ultimately results in cultural ruin.

The Role of the Church and Apologetics in Confronting Relativism

The church must not accommodate relativism; it must confront it. The postmodern turn in some evangelical circles, which couches truth in experiential or cultural terms, must be rejected. Truth is not determined by personal narrative or cultural trends—it is revealed by God in Scripture.

Apologetics has a crucial role in demolishing relativism. As Paul says in 2 Corinthians 10:5, “We demolish arguments and every proud thing that is raised up against the knowledge of God, and we take every thought captive to obey Christ.” Christian apologetics must rigorously expose the contradictions of relativism and assert the supremacy of biblical truth.

This involves engaging with philosophical arguments, demonstrating the reliability of Scripture, and proclaiming the exclusive authority of Christ. It means asserting the objective moral order established by God and refusing to cede ground to the shifting sands of cultural opinion.

The Consequences of Relativism in Society

Relativism’s societal fruit is rotten. In education, it leads to the denial of objective standards. In law, it undermines justice. In family and sexual ethics, it creates moral chaos. It promotes subjectivism, individualism, and nihilism, leaving people without meaning, direction, or accountability.

Isaiah 5:20 warns: “Woe to those who call evil good and good evil.” Relativism does exactly this—reversing moral categories and confusing right with wrong. When society rejects absolute truth, it opens the door to every form of perversion, lawlessness, and spiritual deception.

Image illustrating Absolute Truth from a biblical worldview—with a clear path, glowing Bible, and a figure confidently walking toward light. The contrast with relativism is clear: this path is grounded, guided, and rooted in unchanging truth.

Relativism is not neutral—it is rebellion against God. It exalts the creature over the Creator and makes the individual the arbiter of truth. Its ultimate end is judgment, as Romans 2:5 makes clear: “Because of your hardened and unrepentant heart you are storing up wrath for yourself in the day of wrath, when God’s righteous judgment is revealed.”

Biblical Absolutes: The Only Foundation for Truth

Christianity rests on the reality that God has spoken, and His Word is the final authority. Truth is not discovered through subjective experience, nor invented by societal consensus. It is revealed by God, preserved in Scripture, and validated by the person of Jesus Christ.

This truth applies to all people, in all places, at all times. God “commands all people everywhere to repent” (Acts 17:30). There is no relativism in God’s demands, and no neutrality in His judgment.

Image representing a Biblical Worldview—where all of life’s areas (science, culture, family, justice) are illuminated and guided by the light of God’s Word. The believer walking forward reflects clarity, purpose, and faith grounded in Scripture.

God’s moral law, His gospel call, and His promises of redemption are absolute. The biblical worldview alone provides the philosophical grounding for objective truth, universal morality, rational coherence, and human dignity. All other worldviews, including relativism, ultimately collapse under their own weight.

Conclusion

Relativism is not merely wrong—it is dangerous. It erodes truth, morality, and accountability. It confuses minds, darkens hearts, and destroys societies. Most importantly, it stands in direct contradiction to the revelation of God in Scripture.

The Christian response must be clear, unwavering, and scripturally grounded. We must affirm the truth of God’s Word as the absolute standard by which all beliefs, behaviors, and ideologies are judged. “The sum of your word is truth, and every one of your righteous judgments is eternal” (Psalm 119:160).

Let the church be known not for compromise, but for conviction. Let believers stand as salt and light in an age of confusion, declaring with boldness: “Your word is a lamp for my feet and a light on my path” (Psalm 119:105).

You May Also Benefit From

Reincarnation: A Biblical and Apologetic Refutation of the Doctrine of Multiple Lives

About the Author

EDWARD D. ANDREWS (AS in Criminal Justice, BS in Religion, MA in Biblical Studies, and MDiv in Theology) is CEO and President of Christian Publishing House. He has authored over 220+ books. In addition, Andrews is the Chief Translator of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV).