The Inerrancy of the Bible: A Rational Defense of the Trustworthiness of Scripture

Please Support the Bible Translation Work of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV)

$5.00

Introduction to Biblical Inerrancy

The doctrine of biblical inerrancy asserts that the Scriptures, in their original autographs, are without error in all that they affirm. This conviction is rooted in the understanding that the Bible is the inspired Word of God. If God is perfect, truthful, and incapable of error, then His revelation in Scripture must likewise be free from error. This view is not a subjective preference but is based on clear biblical claims, supported by historical, textual, and archaeological evidence. It stands in direct opposition to modern liberal theology, which frequently adopts critical methodologies that undermine the authority and trustworthiness of the biblical text.

This article presents a reasoned, evidential, and exegetical examination of biblical inerrancy, addressing common criticisms and affirming the reliability of the Scriptures from an evangelical, conservative perspective.

The Biblical Basis for Inerrancy

The claim of inerrancy is not an external imposition upon the Bible but arises directly from the text itself. Scripture repeatedly affirms its divine origin and truthfulness. The Apostle Paul declares in 2 Timothy 3:16 that “all Scripture is inspired by God and is profitable for teaching, for rebuking, for correcting, for training in righteousness.” The Greek term translated “inspired by God” (θεόπνευστος, theopneustos) literally means “God-breathed,” indicating that Scripture is the direct product of God’s communication.

Jesus himself affirms the absolute truth of Scripture. In John 17:17, Christ prays to the Father, “Sanctify them by the truth; your word is truth.” Similarly, in Matthew 5:18, he declares, “truly I tell you, until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest letter or one stroke of a letter will pass away from the law until all things are accomplished.” This underscores both the permanence and the precision of the biblical text.

The psalmist writes in Psalm 19:7-9, “The instruction of Jehovah is perfect, renewing one’s life; the testimony of Jehovah is trustworthy, making the inexperienced wise. The precepts of Jehovah are right, making the heart glad; the command of Jehovah is radiant, making the eyes light up.” Such declarations of perfection, trustworthiness, and righteousness are incompatible with a view of Scripture that allows for error.

Inerrancy and Inspiration: Logical Connection

If Scripture is genuinely God-breathed, and if God is by nature perfect and incapable of falsehood (Titus 1:2: “in the hope of eternal life that God, who cannot lie, promised before time began”), then the product of that divine breath must also be free from error. To assert otherwise is to impugn the character of God himself.

Inerrancy, therefore, is not an isolated or optional doctrine but is integrally connected to the doctrine of divine inspiration. If the Bible contains error, the problem lies not with human scribes or cultural limitations but with the claim that the text is theopneustos. However, Scripture affirms consistently that the Holy Spirit superintended the human authors, ensuring that what they wrote was exactly what God intended (2 Peter 1:20-21: “Above all, you know this: no prophecy of Scripture comes from the prophet’s own interpretation, because no prophecy ever came by the will of man; instead, men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit”).

Addressing Apparent Contradictions and Difficulties

One of the primary objections raised against inerrancy is the claim that the Bible contains contradictions or historical inaccuracies. It is essential to recognize that difficulties within the biblical text do not constitute errors. A difficulty is not a contradiction. A contradiction exists only when two statements assert mutually exclusive truths in the same sense, at the same time, and in the same relationship.

Many so-called contradictions are easily resolved through close examination of the text, attention to context, consideration of linguistic nuances, or understanding of cultural background. For example, the differing accounts of the resurrection in the Gospels are often cited as contradictory. However, upon analysis, these accounts present complementary perspectives from different witnesses, highlighting different aspects of the event without denying the core historical truth of the resurrection itself.

Another common example involves numerical discrepancies. Critics frequently point to variations in numbers reported in Samuel, Kings, and Chronicles. However, these often stem from copyist errors in transmission—not in the original autographs. Furthermore, in ancient Hebrew, numerical notation was far more vulnerable to such copying mistakes due to the similarity of symbols. These transmission issues do not reflect upon the inspiration of the original text but rather upon the human process of copying manuscripts across centuries. The discipline of textual criticism, when conducted responsibly with the proper conservative methodology, demonstrates the extraordinary fidelity of the biblical text through millennia.

Archaeological and Historical Confirmation of Biblical Accuracy

Archaeology has repeatedly confirmed the historical reliability of Scripture. Critics in the past doubted the existence of many biblical figures and cities, only to be refuted by subsequent discoveries. The existence of the Hittites, long denied by skeptics, was confirmed through archaeological excavations in the early 20th century. The Tel Dan inscription, discovered in 1993, provides direct evidence for the historical “house of David,” affirming the biblical record of David’s dynasty.

The discovery of the Babylonian Chronicles and the Cyrus Cylinder corroborates the biblical narrative of Babylon’s conquest and the subsequent decree allowing Jews to return to their land in 537 B.C.E. (Ezra 1:1-4). These confirmations, while not exhaustive of all historical questions, demonstrate the overall trustworthiness of the biblical record.

Manuscript Evidence and Textual Reliability

The textual basis for both the Hebrew Old Testament and the Greek New Testament is remarkably sound. The Masoretic Text, supported by the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls (dated from the 3rd century B.C.E. to the 1st century C.E.), affirms the stability of the Old Testament text. The Isaiah Scroll (1QIsaa), for example, shows a high degree of correspondence with the later Masoretic tradition, demonstrating the careful transmission of the text over time.

For the New Testament, over 5,800 Greek manuscripts exist, along with thousands of Latin, Coptic, Syriac, and other translations. The earliest papyri fragments of the New Testament, such as P52 (dated to approximately 125 C.E.), bring us within a generation of the original compositions. This level of manuscript support is unparalleled in ancient literature. For comparison, the works of Homer, Caesar, and Plato have far fewer copies, with much longer time gaps between original composition and surviving manuscripts.

The science of textual criticism has enabled scholars to reconstruct the New Testament text with over 99.99% certainty to the original autographs. The very small number of textual variants that remain are minor and do not affect any core doctrine or historical claim.

The Witness of Jesus and the Apostles to the Authority of Scripture

The attitude of Jesus and the apostles toward the Scriptures reinforces the doctrine of inerrancy. Jesus consistently treated the Old Testament as authoritative and historically reliable. In Matthew 12:40, he affirms the historicity of Jonah’s three days in the belly of the great fish. In Matthew 19:4-5, Jesus appeals to Genesis 1:27 and 2:24 as literal history regarding creation and marriage.

The apostles likewise affirm the authority and accuracy of Scripture. Paul in Romans 15:4 writes, “For whatever was written in the past was written for our instruction, so that we may have hope through endurance and through the encouragement from the Scriptures.” Peter acknowledges the writings of Paul as Scripture in 2 Peter 3:16, demonstrating that the New Testament writings were regarded as authoritative even in the apostolic age.

Philosophical Considerations on Truth and Language

It is sometimes argued that language itself is inherently incapable of communicating inerrant truth. Such skepticism often arises from postmodern or liberal assumptions that deny the possibility of objective meaning. However, this philosophical relativism collapses upon itself, as the assertion “language cannot convey absolute truth” is itself a claim to absolute truth.

The biblical worldview affirms that God, as the Creator of human language and reason, has the capacity to communicate clearly and reliably. Scripture employs normal human language with all its capacity for precision and nuance. While idioms, metaphors, hyperbole, and phenomenological language are present in Scripture, these do not undermine its truthfulness. Rather, they reflect the normal conventions of human communication, which are fully compatible with accurate and truthful reporting.

The Necessity of Inerrancy for Doctrinal Soundness

Without inerrancy, the doctrinal authority of Scripture collapses. If the Bible is mistaken in historical or factual details, then there is no objective basis for trusting its theological assertions. The doctrines of creation, the fall, the incarnation, the atonement, and the resurrection all depend upon the historical reality of the events they describe. Paul makes this point emphatically in 1 Corinthians 15:14: “and if Christ has not been raised, then our proclamation is in vain, and so is your faith.”

The erosion of biblical authority in liberal theology has always begun with the denial of inerrancy. Once Scripture is treated as merely human reflection, subject to error, all doctrines become negotiable. The history of theological decline in denominations that have abandoned inerrancy underscores its essential role in preserving doctrinal integrity.

You May Also Enjoy

The Foreknowledge of God: An Evangelical Defense of Molinism and Middle Knowledge

About the Author

EDWARD D. ANDREWS (AS in Criminal Justice, BS in Religion, MA in Biblical Studies, and MDiv in Theology) is CEO and President of Christian Publishing House. He has authored over 220+ books. In addition, Andrews is the Chief Translator of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV).