Modern Liberalism and Its Assault on Biblical Authority

Please Support the Bible Translation Work of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV)

$5.00

Introduction to Modern Liberalism

Modern liberalism within theology represents a significant departure from the historical, orthodox Christian faith as rooted in the inspired, inerrant Word of God. Emerging primarily during the Enlightenment and gaining momentum in the 19th and 20th centuries, theological liberalism sought to reinterpret Christianity through the lens of human reason, philosophical naturalism, and skepticism toward supernatural revelation. At its core, liberal theology rejects or radically redefines foundational doctrines such as biblical inerrancy, the historicity of Scripture, the virgin birth, the bodily resurrection of Jesus, the atoning death of Christ, and the reality of divine judgment.

This article provides a rigorous, factual analysis of modern liberalism, exposing its methodological flaws, unscriptural assumptions, and the devastating effects it has had on the integrity of biblical Christianity. This examination is conducted from a conservative evangelical perspective, affirming the complete trustworthiness of Scripture and rejecting the speculative, subjective approaches that characterize liberal theology.

Historical Origins of Modern Liberalism

The rise of modern liberalism cannot be understood apart from the intellectual climate of the Enlightenment (17th–18th centuries), which elevated human reason as the ultimate arbiter of truth. Thinkers like René Descartes, Immanuel Kant, David Hume, and Baruch Spinoza championed rationalism, empiricism, and skepticism, which laid the groundwork for critical attitudes toward the supernatural elements of Scripture.

The 19th century witnessed the formal application of these philosophical currents to biblical studies through the development of the so-called “Historical-Critical Method,” which treated the Bible as a purely human product subject to the same critical scrutiny as any other ancient document. Figures such as Friedrich Schleiermacher, considered the “father of modern liberal theology,” redefined religion as a feeling of absolute dependence, thereby shifting the focus from objective revelation to subjective human experience.

Subsequent thinkers like Albrecht Ritschl, Adolf von Harnack, and Rudolf Bultmann continued this trajectory, emphasizing ethical teachings and demythologization, while rejecting or minimizing the historicity of biblical events. The result was a theological system that effectively dismissed the core message of the Bible under the guise of intellectual respectability.

Core Tenets of Modern Liberal Theology

Modern liberal theology is marked by several key presuppositions that are fundamentally at odds with biblical Christianity. First, it denies the full inspiration and inerrancy of Scripture, viewing the Bible as a flawed collection of religious reflections rather than the infallible Word of God. Liberal theologians typically argue that the Bible contains errors, contradictions, and mythological elements, especially in accounts of miracles, prophecy, and historical narratives.

Second, modern liberalism prioritizes human experience and cultural context over divine revelation. Religion is reduced to ethical principles or subjective feelings rather than objective truths grounded in God’s authoritative self-disclosure. This approach leads to the relativization of doctrine, where truth becomes malleable and determined by social or personal preferences rather than by Scripture.

Third, liberal theology reinterprets or rejects supernatural elements, including the virgin birth of Christ (Matthew 1:18-25; Luke 1:26-38), the bodily resurrection (Luke 24:36-43; John 20:24-29; 1 Corinthians 15:3-8), and the substitutionary atonement (Isaiah 53:4-6; Romans 3:21-26). Such views undermine the very heart of the gospel message as consistently presented throughout Scripture.

Finally, modern liberalism exhibits a strong tendency toward universalism or inclusivism, denying or downplaying the exclusivity of salvation through Jesus Christ alone (John 14:6; Acts 4:12; 1 Timothy 2:5-6). The biblical warnings about judgment, hell (Gehenna), and eternal destruction are often reinterpreted allegorically or dismissed entirely.

The Assault on Biblical Inerrancy

One of the most destructive features of modern liberal theology is its systematic attack on the doctrine of biblical inerrancy. Liberal theologians, influenced by naturalistic presuppositions, argue that the Bible cannot be trusted as historically accurate or theologically authoritative because it was allegedly shaped by cultural biases, political agendas, or theological evolution.

The Historical-Critical Method, including source criticism, form criticism, redaction criticism, and tradition history, treats the biblical text as a patchwork of disparate sources compiled over centuries. This approach has led to speculative theories such as the Documentary Hypothesis (JEDP theory) regarding the Pentateuch and the Two-Source Hypothesis concerning the Synoptic Gospels. These theories are built on assumptions rather than evidence and often ignore the internal claims of Scripture and the early church’s testimony.

In contrast, the conservative evangelical position affirms that “all Scripture is inspired by God” (2 Timothy 3:16) and that “men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit” (2 Peter 1:21). The doctrine of verbal plenary inspiration means that every word of the original manuscripts was exactly what God intended, fully truthful in all that it affirms. The textual criticism that undergirds the reconstruction of the Hebrew and Greek texts demonstrates a 99.99% accuracy rate with the originals, leaving no rational basis for the wholesale skepticism promoted by liberal theology.

Liberal Denial of Miracles and Prophecy

The rejection of the miraculous in Scripture is a hallmark of modern liberalism. Following the rationalist critique of figures like David Hume, liberals argue that miracles are impossible because they violate the “laws of nature.” This presupposition directly contradicts the biblical worldview, which affirms that God, as Creator and Sovereign of the universe, can act within His creation according to His will.

The denial of predictive prophecy is another common feature of liberal theology. Prophecies concerning the Messiah, such as Isaiah 53, Micah 5:2, and Daniel 9:24-27, are frequently reinterpreted as post-event constructions or poetic expressions with no predictive element. This approach undermines the integrity of the prophetic witness and denies the clear claims of the prophets themselves, who repeatedly affirmed that they spoke the words of Jehovah (Isaiah 1:1-2; Jeremiah 1:4-9; Ezekiel 2:1-7).

Such denials of miracles and prophecy are not based on objective textual analysis but on the philosophical commitment to naturalism. The rejection of supernatural revelation rests on circular reasoning: miracles are deemed impossible, therefore the biblical reports of miracles must be false.

Ethical Revisionism and Social Gospel Distortions

Another defining characteristic of modern liberalism is the redefinition of Christian ethics through the lens of secular humanism and social activism. Instead of proclaiming salvation through repentance and faith in Jesus Christ, liberal theology often reduces the mission of the church to social reform, political activism, or humanitarian aid.

This “social gospel” movement, prominent in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, viewed Christianity primarily as a means to improve social conditions, eliminate poverty, and promote social justice. While Scripture certainly commands believers to care for the poor and pursue justice (Micah 6:8; James 1:27), these ethical responsibilities are always rooted in the redemptive work of Christ and the call to personal holiness, not in a political or social agenda divorced from gospel proclamation.

Modern liberalism often exchanges the biblical doctrine of sin, which is rebellion against God’s holy standards (Romans 3:23), for a view of sin as merely social injustice or systemic oppression. Consequently, the message of the cross is emptied of its power, and the need for individual repentance and transformation through the gospel is obscured.

Theological Pluralism and Religious Relativism

Liberal theology’s rejection of biblical authority naturally leads to theological pluralism—the belief that all religions are valid paths to God. This view directly contradicts the exclusive claims of Scripture, where Jesus declares, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me” (John 14:6).

By denying the uniqueness of Christ and the necessity of faith in him for salvation, liberal theology abandons the heart of the Christian gospel. This pluralistic tendency also opens the door to syncretism, blending Christian concepts with pagan beliefs or modern ideologies, further corrupting the doctrinal purity of the faith.

The Collapse of Doctrinal Integrity in Liberal Churches

The historical consequences of modern liberalism are evident in the theological and numerical decline of denominations that have embraced its tenets. Once vibrant churches that capitulated to liberal theology have often experienced significant membership losses, doctrinal confusion, and moral compromise.

The abandonment of biblical inerrancy leads inevitably to the erosion of every other major doctrine. The virgin birth, the resurrection, the atonement, the return of Christ, and the reality of divine judgment all become optional or denied. When the foundation of Scripture is undermined, there is no objective standard by which to discern truth from error.

Liberalism’s Failure to Address the Human Condition

Modern liberalism ultimately fails because it does not address the core problem of the human condition—sin and alienation from God. By reducing Christianity to moral uplift or social ethics, liberal theology offers no solution to the problem of guilt and no hope for eternal life. The gospel message, as revealed in Scripture, declares that salvation is by grace through faith, on the basis of Christ’s atoning sacrifice, not by works of righteousness or social achievement (Ephesians 2:8-9; Titus 3:5).

The liberal message cannot reconcile sinful humanity to a holy God because it denies the necessity of the cross. In so doing, it leaves people in their sin, substituting platitudes and activism for true redemption and regeneration.

You May Also Enjoy

Genetic Ethics: A Biblical and Evangelical Apologetic Analysis of Biotechnology and Moral Responsibility

About the Author

EDWARD D. ANDREWS (AS in Criminal Justice, BS in Religion, MA in Biblical Studies, and MDiv in Theology) is CEO and President of Christian Publishing House. He has authored over 220+ books. In addition, Andrews is the Chief Translator of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV).