Please Support the Bible Translation Work of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV)

$5.00

I. Introduction: Historical Framework of Jeremiah 39 and 2 Kings 25

The fall of Jerusalem in 587 B.C.E. marked a pivotal moment in both biblical history and Near Eastern geopolitical affairs. As Jeremiah 39 and 2 Kings 25 recount, the Babylonian army under King Nebuchadnezzar II invaded Judah, breached Jerusalem, and carried out a series of destructive and administrative operations that culminated in the exile of a significant portion of the Jewish population. Key to understanding these accounts is the mention of various Babylonian officials—Nebusarsechim, Nergal-sharezer, and Nebuzaradan—whose names and roles are now also attested in extra-biblical sources, offering a rare and valuable convergence between biblical narrative and ancient Mesopotamian records.

II. Names and Ranks of Babylonian Officials in the Biblical Text

Jeremiah 39:3 provides a list of Babylonian officials who physically entered Jerusalem and sat “at the Middle Gate,” a symbolic and perhaps literal demonstration of conquest and authority:

“All the officials of the king of Babylon entered and sat at the Middle Gate: Nergal-sharezer, Samgar, Nebusarsechim the chief of staff, Nergal-sharezer the chief soothsayer, and all the rest of the officials of Babylon’s king.” (Jer. 39:3)

Later in the chapter, verse 9 introduces Nebuzaradan, described as the captain of the guard, who deported the remaining people to Babylon. This scene aligns chronologically with 2 Kings 25:8–21 and Jeremiah 52:12–27, in which Nebuzaradan is shown as the executioner of Nebuchadnezzar’s orders for the destruction and exile phase following Jerusalem’s fall. Each of these individuals held an important military or administrative role, and all are mentioned by name—an unusual feature in ancient military conquest literature, which typically emphasizes the king alone.

III. Archaeological Evidence Supporting Nebusarsechim (Nabu-sharrussu-ukin)

Among the most compelling archaeological corroborations of a biblical figure is the identification of Nebusarsechim (in Hebrew) with Nabu-sharrussu-ukin (in Akkadian), a prominent Babylonian official. This identification is based on a small clay tablet (BM 114789) housed in the British Museum, dated to the 10th year of Nebuchadnezzar II’s reign (595 B.C.E.). The tablet reads:

“(Regarding) 1.5 minas of gold, the property of Nabu-sharrussu-ukin, the chief eunuch, which he sent via Arad-Banitu the eunuch to [the temple] Esangila: Arad-Banitu has delivered [it] to Esangila. In the presence of Bel-usat, son of Aplaya, the royal bodyguard, [and of] Nadin, son of Marduk-zer-ibni. Month XI, day 18, year 10 [of] Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon.”

This text directly names the individual “Nabu-sharrussu-ukin, the chief eunuch,” which aligns with the Hebrew title for Nebusarsechim, “chief of staff” or “rab-saris,” in Jeremiah 39:3. The rab-saris was indeed a high-ranking court official, often translated as “chief eunuch” but denoting more a political or military rank than merely a physical status. The time frame of the tablet, 595 B.C.E., places the official squarely within Nebuchadnezzar’s reign and supports the notion that such a man served during the campaign against Judah.

IV. Nergal-sharezer (Nergal-shar-usur) in Cuneiform and Rabmag Identification

The biblical name Nergal-sharezer appears twice in Jeremiah 39:3, once simply by name and another time with the title Rabmag. In ancient Akkadian, the name corresponds to “Nergal-shar-usur,” which means “O Nergal, protect the king.” This name appears in Babylonian records and royal inscriptions. For instance, the Babylonian king Neriglissar, who ruled Babylon from 560 to 556 B.C.E., bore this very name, Nergal-shar-usur. While the timelines suggest the Nergal-sharezer mentioned in Jeremiah was not yet king at the time of Jerusalem’s fall, the identification suggests he was a high-ranking prince or military commander under Nebuchadnezzar, possibly the same person who later ascended the throne.

The title Rabmag (Jer. 39:3, 13) is often translated as “chief soothsayer” or “chief magus,” indicating a senior position in the Babylonian magisterial or religious hierarchy. In Akkadian, it may derive from rab mūgi, denoting a high official among the magi or a military-political adviser. The presence of two Nergal-sharezers in Jeremiah 39:3—possibly referring to the same individual with and without his title—reflects the ancient Near Eastern literary custom of repetition for emphasis or identification.

On a Babylonian prism discovered in the ruins of Babylon (now in the Istanbul Archaeological Museum), a list of officials includes the name “Nergal-shar-usur,” confirming the existence of a man by that name serving in Nebuchadnezzar’s court. This supports the biblical text’s accuracy in naming real, high-ranking Babylonian personnel.

V. Nebuzaradan: The Executioner of Jerusalem’s Destruction

Nebuzaradan (Babylonian: Nabû-zēru-iddina or Nabû-zēr-iddinam), meaning “Nebo has given offspring,” was the captain of the guard (Hebrew: rab tabbachim) under Nebuchadnezzar. Unlike the officials named in Jeremiah 39:3 who arrived at the fall of the city, Nebuzaradan appears later in the narrative, as in 2 Kings 25:8:

“On the seventh day of the fifth month—that was the nineteenth year of King Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon—Nebuzaradan, the captain of the guards, a servant of the king of Babylon, came to Jerusalem.”

His arrival occurs after the city was already breached and King Zedekiah was captured and blinded. Nebuzaradan then carries out the final stage of Babylonian policy toward Judah—plundering, burning, destroying the temple, and deporting the people.

The Babylonian prism previously mentioned also includes a name Nabû-zēr-iddinam, which aligns phonetically with Nebuzaradan. This reinforces the historicity of his role, name, and position. His function as captain of the bodyguard meant he was more than a military commander; he was the king’s trusted executor, overseeing operations personally mandated by the throne.

VI. Chronological Sequence of Events Involving the Officials

From the synchrony of Jeremiah, 2 Kings, and the Babylonian records, a reconstruction of the timeline surrounding these officials is as follows:

Jerusalem was besieged beginning in 588 B.C.E., and the walls were breached in 587 B.C.E. On the seventh day of the fifth month (around August 18, 587 B.C.E.), Nebuzaradan arrived at Jerusalem (2 Kings 25:8). According to Jeremiah 52:12–13, three days later, on the tenth day of the fifth month, he entered the city and set fire to the temple. Josephus later comments that the destruction of Herod’s temple in 70 C.E. also occurred on the same day—a notable, though extra-biblical, historical parallel.

Throughout this period, Nebusarsechim and Nergal-sharezer were likely involved in the military conquest, while Nebuzaradan was involved in the administration and aftermath.

VII. Nebuzaradan’s Role in Jeremiah’s Release and the Deportation

Jeremiah 39:11–14 and 40:1–7 report that Nebuchadnezzar gave direct orders to Nebuzaradan to treat Jeremiah kindly. Nebuzaradan personally released Jeremiah from his chains and allowed him to decide where he wanted to go. This degree of clemency highlights Nebuzaradan’s role as not only an executioner of judgment but also a channel of royal clemency.

In 582 B.C.E., five years after Jerusalem’s destruction, Nebuzaradan led another deportation of Jews, possibly involving those who had fled to neighboring nations (Jer. 52:30). This act corresponds to a later phase of Babylon’s tightening control over its western provinces.

VIII. Implications for Biblical Reliability

The convergence of biblical records with Babylonian administrative and ceremonial tablets, particularly regarding names, titles, and roles of officials, confirms the historical reliability of the biblical accounts. These are not anachronistic or fictitious additions, but real figures whose existence is now externally corroborated. Furthermore, the specificity of the Hebrew transliterations of Babylonian names, which align closely with the Akkadian originals, indicates an authentic eyewitness source or contemporary account.

It is also important to note that these discoveries demonstrate the accuracy of Jeremiah’s accounts in naming Babylonian officers, a feat unlikely if the accounts were fabricated centuries later, as some liberal-critical scholars suggest. These findings support a contemporary composition of the text and bolster confidence in its historical integrity.

IX. Conclusion: Confirmed Historicity and Accurate Transmission

The archaeological findings that confirm the names and positions of Nebusarsechim, Nergal-sharezer, and Nebuzaradan provide strong support for the literal historicity of Jeremiah 39 and its parallels in 2 Kings. These are not fictional constructs or literary archetypes, but actual historical figures whose names have survived in Babylonian bureaucratic and ceremonial texts. Their presence in both the Bible and Babylonian sources underscores the text’s accuracy in depicting events and individuals of the late 7th and early 6th centuries B.C.E. This adds yet another layer of evidence to the reliability of the biblical text, demonstrating its precision even in political and administrative detail.

Nebusarsechim, Nergal-sharezer, and Nebuzaradan: Babylonian Officials Under King Nebuchadnezzar—A Deep-Dive Analysis of Their Governmental Roles, Military Functions, and Theological Implications in Light of Archaeological Evidence

I. Nebusarsechim (Nabu-sharrussu-ukin): Court Functionary and Royal Proxy

A. Title and Administrative Role in the Babylonian Government

Nebusarsechim is identified in the Hebrew text of Jeremiah 39:3 as rab-saris, rendered “chief of staff” or “chief eunuch.” The Akkadian counterpart rab ša rēši literally means “chief of the head,” referring not to a personal trait, but to a role as the chief chamberlain or highest-ranking palace official under the king. The individual in question, Nabu-sharrussu-ukin, bore the title in Babylonian administrative documents, particularly in a cuneiform tablet dated to the 10th year of Nebuchadnezzar’s reign (BM 114789).

The tablet shows that Nabu-sharrussu-ukin had control of royal wealth and operated within the framework of temple logistics. He oversaw the dispatch of a significant quantity of gold (1.5 minas, about 750 grams) to the temple Esangila, which was dedicated to Marduk, Babylon’s chief deity. This act of dispatching gold reflects not merely religious devotion but political authority, for temple finances and state governance were deeply intertwined in Babylonian administration. The chief eunuch operated as a semi-viceroy, capable of executing orders on behalf of the king in both sacred and secular matters.

His proximity to royal decision-making would explain why Nebusarsechim appears among the first wave of Babylonian officials in Jerusalem’s capture. His function likely included intelligence gathering, civilian assessments, and supervision of elite captives. The sending of gold to Esangila also suggests a linkage between military conquest and religious appeasement, where victories were ritually acknowledged before Marduk through temple offerings.

B. Theological Implications: Scriptural Accuracy and Divine Judgment

The presence of a Babylonian official in such a precise role—and one confirmed archaeologically—underscores the historical precision of Jeremiah’s account. From a theological perspective, this is not incidental. The Babylonian conquest was not merely a geopolitical event; it was divinely orchestrated judgment upon Judah. Jeremiah 25:9 explicitly identifies Nebuchadnezzar as Jehovah’s “servant,” an instrument of divine retribution:

“I am now sending for all the families of the north,” declares Jehovah, “sending for my servant King Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon, and I will bring them against this land…”

Nebusarsechim’s role as an executor of imperial policy under Nebuchadnezzar places him within this broader divine scheme. Although a pagan, his name—meaning “Nabu has established his son”—demonstrates how Babylonian theology was centered on divine appointment and legitimacy, albeit from a polytheistic framework. The irony is theologically deliberate: men who believed themselves to serve Nabu and Marduk were in reality fulfilling the will of Jehovah, whose decree had gone forth through His prophet.

C. Additional References and Cross-Corroboration

Beyond BM 114789, the name Nabu-sharrussu-ukin appears in other administrative texts, though these often refer to different individuals bearing the same theophoric name. The unique combination of title and date in the British Museum tablet, however, aligns conclusively with the Nebusarsechim mentioned in Jeremiah 39:3. This represents a singular instance of biblical and Babylonian synchrony involving a named official and specific administrative function.

II. Nergal-sharezer (Nergal-shar-usur): Political Prince and Possible Future King

A. Political Standing and Title: The Rabmag Designation

Jeremiah 39:3 identifies two references to Nergal-sharezer: one by name alone and one by name plus the title rabmag. The title, while debated in detail, is best understood from Akkadian rab mugi, meaning “chief soothsayer” or “chief of the magi.” While “soothsayer” may seem too narrow, the rabmag had broad responsibilities encompassing diplomacy, royal advisement, and court magic in Babylonian ideology.

If Nergal-sharezer was indeed the same person who later became king (Neriglissar), as suggested by Babylonian records and Greek sources (Berossus), then he held considerable prestige and royal bloodlines. Neriglissar was known to be Nebuchadnezzar’s son-in-law, married to his daughter Kashshaya. This relationship would explain his early involvement in key military conquests.

B. Archaeological References to Nergal-shar-usur

Nergal-shar-usur appears in several Babylonian inscriptions, notably on building inscriptions and economic tablets during his own reign (560–556 B.C.E.). However, the most significant find comes from the Babylonian courtier lists, such as those on a prism now in Istanbul, where his name appears among other elite officials. This supports the assertion that he was a functioning noble during Nebuchadnezzar’s reign before ascending the throne.

The correspondence of the name Nergal-sharezer with Nergal-shar-usur is not merely phonetic but functional. The latter, meaning “O Nergal, protect the king,” is fitting for someone in court service and likely aligned with the protective theological role the official saw himself as playing.

C. Theological Implications and Interplay with Jeremiah’s Ministry

Nergal-sharezer’s assistance in the release of Jeremiah (Jer. 39:13–14) presents a paradox. A Babylonian official—and possible future king—acted as a deliverer of a true prophet of Jehovah. This aligns with God’s use of foreign agents to protect His remnant and faithful witnesses, a theme found throughout Scripture (e.g., Cyrus in Isa. 45:1).

This incident also affirms Jeremiah’s divine protection and prophetic legitimacy. Rather than being suppressed or executed as a perceived traitor, Jeremiah was honored by the foreign victors, further validating the divine origin of his mission. This is theologically consistent with Jehovah’s sovereignty over nations (Jer. 27:6–7), where foreign kings and their agents serve His purposes—even unknowingly.

III. Nebuzaradan (Nabû-zēr-iddinam): Military Executor and Imperial Enforcer

A. Position in Babylonian Military Hierarchy

Nebuzaradan was rab tabbachim, literally “chief of the slaughterers,” but better understood as “captain of the guard.” In the Babylonian military structure, this officer was responsible for the king’s elite guard, as well as special executionary tasks involving political prisoners, city administrators, and deportees.

The Akkadian equivalent rab ṭābiḥi was more than a ceremonial role. It combined military execution with internal security and was often entrusted to deal with rebellious provinces. That Nebuzaradan is the one dispatched to finalize Jerusalem’s destruction reflects Nebuchadnezzar’s high trust in him and his capacity for violent enforcement of imperial will.

The name Nabû-zēr-iddinam appears on a Babylonian prism listing Nebuchadnezzar’s courtiers. It translates to “Nebo has given offspring,” indicating a theophoric dedication to the Babylonian god of wisdom and scribal power. His name is thus emblematic of his authority as both a royal executor and record keeper.

B. Chronological and Textual Details

Nebuzaradan arrives one month after the city’s fall (2 Kings 25:8–9; Jer. 52:12–14). He oversees the destruction of Jerusalem and particularly the burning of the temple. The act is significant both historically and theologically. The burning on the tenth day of the fifth month (Ab) became a national tragedy memorialized in Jewish tradition. Josephus, writing later, notes that the second temple was burned by Rome on the same calendar day, though that observation, while historically notable, is not scriptural.

Nebuzaradan is also noted for taking an additional group of captives five years later (Jer. 52:30). This staggered deportation aligns with known Babylonian imperial practice, where initial conquests were followed by later clean-up operations against remnant resistance or returning refugees.

C. Theological Themes of Judgment and Mercy

Though an agent of devastation, Nebuzaradan’s treatment of Jeremiah in Jeremiah 40:1–6 is marked by respect and leniency. He explicitly states:

“Jehovah your God foretold this disaster against this place, and Jehovah has brought it about, just as he said…” (Jer. 40:2–3)

That a Babylonian official would acknowledge Jehovah’s fulfillment of prophecy, even without covenant allegiance, is a remarkable theological development. It affirms the scope of divine sovereignty and the credibility of prophetic warnings. This acknowledgment of Jeremiah’s God shows that even pagan nations recognized the unique fulfillment of His word.

D. Strategic Role in Imperial Policy Toward Judah

Nebuzaradan’s role extended beyond destruction. He was involved in setting up the local administration under Gedaliah (Jer. 40:5), thus beginning the Babylonian strategy of provincial oversight. Babylon, unlike Assyria, often preferred vassal governance over mass resettlement, particularly in semi-loyal or economically depressed regions. Nebuzaradan’s enforcement of this policy demonstrates his dual role as both military officer and political administrator.

IV. Conclusion: Validity of Scripture and Integration with Historical Data

The cases of Nebusarsechim, Nergal-sharezer, and Nebuzaradan demonstrate not merely the historical plausibility of the biblical text, but its direct agreement with extrabiblical records. The names, titles, offices, and actions align with known Neo-Babylonian practices and administrative structures. Their appearance in the biblical narrative is consistent with their known function in Babylonian society, and the archaeological data from cuneiform tablets and prisms confirm their existence and roles during the very time Scripture claims.

Moreover, theologically, each of these men—though serving pagan deities—was used by Jehovah to execute His judgments, preserve His prophet, and fulfill His word. They are illustrations of divine sovereignty over all nations, a theme Jeremiah expounded repeatedly (Jer. 1:10; 25:15–27; 27:6–7). The convergence of biblical accuracy, historical record, and theological message reinforces the inerrancy and inspiration of the biblical record.

You May Also Enjoy

Nebuchadnezzar II and Evil-merodach, Kings of Babylon

About the Author

SCROLL THROUGH THE DIFFERENT CATEGORIES BELOW

BIBLE TRANSLATION AND TEXTUAL CRITICISM

BIBLICAL STUDIES / BIBLE BACKGROUND / HISTORY OF THE BIBLE/ INTERPRETATION

EARLY CHRISTIANITY

HISTORY OF CHRISTIANITY

CHRISTIAN APOLOGETIC EVANGELISM

TECHNOLOGY AND THE CHRISTIAN

CHRISTIAN THEOLOGY

CHILDREN’S BOOKS

HOW TO PRAY AND PRAYER LIFE

TEENS-YOUTH-ADOLESCENCE-JUVENILE

 

CHRISTIAN LIVING—SPIRITUAL GROWTH—SELF-HELP

 

 

APOLOGETIC BIBLE BACKGROUND EXPOSITION BIBLE COMMENTARIES

CHRISTIAN DEVOTIONALS

CHURCH HEALTH, GROWTH, AND HISTORY

Apocalyptic-Eschatology [End Times]

CHRISTIAN FICTION