Please Support the Bible Translation Work of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV)

$5.00

The Claim of Biblical Inerrancy and the Nature of Scripture

The doctrine of inerrancy is a foundational aspect of conservative Evangelical Christian belief. It asserts that the original manuscripts (autographs) of the Bible are without error or contradiction in everything they affirm. This conviction is grounded in the belief that the Bible is divinely inspired (2 Timothy 3:16) and that God, who is perfect and cannot lie (Titus 1:2), would not inspire a text that contains errors.

Inerrancy focuses specifically on the original texts of the Bible, acknowledging that later copies and translations may contain minor scribal or transmission errors. These are considered part of the human copying process and do not undermine the truthfulness of Scripture in any doctrinal or historical claim.

In light of this, when examining the charge of alleged errors in the Bible, it is essential to engage with a proper understanding of what inerrancy entails. It does not claim that the Bible conforms to modern scientific language or that every statement is a technical description. Instead, the Bible conveys divine truth through a variety of literary genres, styles, and forms.

Alleged Errors and the Historical-Grammatical Method

When considering accusations of errors in the Bible, it is crucial to apply the Historical-Grammatical Method of interpretation. This method emphasizes interpreting Scripture based on its original context, language, and the intention of the author. Errors are often claimed when verses are taken out of context or misinterpreted based on modern sensibilities rather than the historical and cultural realities of the biblical world.

Understanding Context and Intent

One of the most common sources of alleged errors in the Bible arises when critics fail to account for the context of the passage. Biblical authors wrote in specific historical settings and used language appropriate to their time. What might appear as a contradiction or error can often be resolved by understanding the text within its original cultural and linguistic framework.

For example, in the Gospels, the different accounts of Peter’s denial of Jesus seem to provide varying details (Matthew 26:69-75; Mark 14:66-72; Luke 22:54-62; John 18:15-18, 25-27). However, when viewed in light of the distinct perspectives and emphases of the Gospel writers, these accounts complement rather than contradict each other. Each Gospel provides its own narrative focus, and the variations in detail reflect the natural differences in eyewitness testimony and narrative purpose, not contradictions.

Apparent Contradictions and Harmonization

Many alleged errors in the Bible revolve around apparent contradictions. Critics point to differences in numbers, names, or details between parallel passages, particularly in the Old and New Testaments. However, a careful examination of the texts often reveals that these differences can be harmonized when properly understood.

Numerical Discrepancies in Chronicles and Kings

One common example involves numerical discrepancies between parallel accounts in 1 Chronicles and 2 Kings. Critics argue that the differing figures, such as the number of soldiers or items in Solomon’s temple, demonstrate errors in the Bible.

For instance, 2 Chronicles 4:5 states that the bronze sea held “three thousand baths,” while 1 Kings 7:26 gives the number as “two thousand baths.” This difference can be resolved by understanding the language used. The figure in 2 Chronicles likely refers to the total capacity, while the number in 1 Kings refers to the amount it typically held in practice. In both cases, these are approximations rather than exact mathematical statements, which would have been consistent with ancient record-keeping methods.

Differences in Genealogies

Another area where critics claim error is in the genealogies of Jesus found in Matthew 1 and Luke 3. The genealogies differ significantly in names and structure, leading some to assert that the Bible contains contradictions. However, these genealogies serve different purposes and reflect different aspects of Jesus’ lineage. Matthew’s genealogy traces the legal line of Jesus through Joseph, emphasizing Jesus’ royal heritage from David, while Luke’s genealogy traces the biological line through Mary, highlighting Jesus’ humanity and connection to all mankind. The differing genealogies do not represent errors but different theological emphases within the Gospel narratives.

Literary Genres and Figures of Speech

The Bible contains a wide variety of literary genres, including historical narrative, poetry, wisdom literature, prophecy, apocalyptic visions, and epistles. Each genre has its own conventions, and understanding these conventions is essential for interpreting the text accurately.

Poetry and Hyperbole

In poetry and wisdom literature, the use of figurative language, metaphor, and hyperbole is common. Failure to recognize these literary forms can lead to claims of error. For example, in Psalm 19:6, the psalmist describes the sun as “rising” and “running its course.” Critics might argue that this reflects a pre-scientific view of the cosmos. However, this language is poetic and observational, not a scientific description of astronomy. Even in modern speech, we continue to use terms like “sunrise” and “sunset” without intending to convey scientific error. The psalmist’s use of figurative language conveys the majesty of creation and God’s glory rather than attempting to describe the mechanics of the solar system.

Parables and Metaphors

Similarly, parables and metaphors are not intended to be interpreted as literal accounts. Jesus frequently used parables to teach spiritual truths, but these stories were not meant to describe historical events. The parable of the prodigal son (Luke 15:11-32) is a vivid illustration of God’s grace and forgiveness, not a literal account of a particular family. Confusing figurative language with literal history can lead to unfounded accusations of error.

Scientific Descriptions in the Bible

Critics of the Bible sometimes claim that it contains scientific errors, particularly when describing the natural world. However, the Bible is not a science textbook and does not aim to provide detailed scientific explanations. Instead, the Bible speaks in the language of common observation, using terms and descriptions familiar to the people of its time.

Descriptions of Creation

Genesis 1 and 2 provide the account of God’s creation of the world. Some claim that the differences between the two chapters represent a contradiction. Genesis 1 presents a broad, chronological account of creation, while Genesis 2 focuses specifically on the creation of man and woman, providing more detail about their relationship and role. These two accounts are complementary, not contradictory, offering different perspectives on the same event.

Moreover, Genesis 1 uses language that would have been understandable to an ancient audience. The description of the creation of light, the separation of waters, and the formation of land and sky reflects an orderly process that emphasizes God’s sovereignty and creative power. While some critics may view this account as incompatible with modern scientific theories, it is essential to recognize that the purpose of Genesis is theological, not scientific. It affirms that Jehovah is the Creator of all things (Genesis 1:1) and that creation is good and purposeful.

The Flat Earth Claim

A common charge is that the Bible teaches a flat earth, citing verses like Isaiah 40:22, which speaks of God sitting “above the circle of the earth.” However, this verse does not claim that the earth is flat. The Hebrew word for “circle” (ḥûg) can also mean “sphere” or “roundness,” indicating the earth’s general shape. The Bible uses phenomenological language—describing things as they appear from a human perspective, which is still common in modern language. For example, we speak of the “four corners of the earth” in idiomatic expressions, not to describe geography literally.

Moral and Ethical Objections

Some critics claim that the Bible contains moral errors or teachings that seem harsh by modern standards. For example, laws in the Old Testament concerning slavery, warfare, and capital punishment are often cited as evidence that the Bible is morally flawed. However, these accusations overlook the progressive nature of biblical revelation and the context in which these laws were given.

Slavery in the Old Testament

The institution of slavery in the ancient world was vastly different from the race-based chattel slavery practiced in more recent history. In the Old Testament, slavery was often a form of debt repayment or protection for impoverished individuals. Slaves were given rights and protections under the Mosaic Law (Exodus 21:2-11; Leviticus 25:39-55). While the Bible acknowledges the existence of slavery in ancient societies, it does not endorse the cruel and dehumanizing practices associated with later forms of slavery. Instead, the New Testament calls for the ethical treatment of all individuals, including slaves (Colossians 4:1), and the Gospel ultimately affirms the equality of all people in Christ (Galatians 3:28).

The Canaanite Conquest

One of the most challenging moral questions raised by critics concerns the command to destroy the Canaanites in the conquest of the Promised Land (Deuteronomy 7:1-2). This command is viewed by some as an endorsement of genocide. However, a careful study of the text reveals that the destruction of the Canaanites was a unique judgment by God against a deeply sinful and corrupt culture that practiced idolatry, child sacrifice, and other abominable acts (Leviticus 18:24-30). The conquest of Canaan was not about ethnic cleansing but about purging the land of evil practices that had persisted for centuries. Furthermore, God provided opportunities for repentance and mercy to those who turned from their wickedness, as demonstrated by Rahab and her family (Joshua 2:9-14; 6:22-25).

Transmission of the Biblical Text

Another area of criticism involves the transmission of the biblical text. Some argue that the Bible has been altered or corrupted over time, leading to errors in the versions we have today. However, the science of textual criticism has demonstrated that the Bible is remarkably well-preserved. The thousands of manuscript copies of the New Testament, for example, allow scholars to reconstruct the original text with a high degree of confidence. While minor variations exist in some manuscripts, none of these variations affect core doctrines or significant historical events.

The Dead Sea Scrolls

The discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls in 1947 provided further evidence of the reliability of the Old Testament text. These ancient manuscripts, dating as far back as the third century B.C.E., contained portions of almost every book of the Hebrew Bible. When compared to the Masoretic Text (the authoritative Hebrew text of the Jewish Bible), the Dead Sea Scrolls show that the text of the Old Testament has been faithfully transmitted over the centuries with only minor variations.

Resolving Alleged Errors Through Proper Hermeneutics

The key to resolving most claims of error lies in the faithful application of hermeneutical principles. The Historical-Grammatical Method demands that we approach the text with the intent to uncover the original meaning, and this often requires diligent study of the cultural, linguistic, and historical background. Furthermore, understanding the genre of the text, such as recognizing poetry, metaphor, or historical narrative, helps us avoid errors in interpretation.

The Role of Apparent Contradictions

Apparent contradictions in the Bible often serve as opportunities for deeper study rather than undermining the integrity of the text. Many difficulties can be resolved by consulting parallel passages, studying the original languages, and understanding the ancient worldview. Moreover, the unity of Scripture, despite being written over a span of more than 1,500 years by around 40 different authors, testifies to its divine inspiration and coherence.

The Bible, when rightly understood and interpreted using the Historical-Grammatical Method, stands as a divinely inspired, inerrant, and authoritative text. While critics may claim errors, most of these claims arise from misunderstandings, misinterpretations, or failure to appreciate the ancient context and literary forms of Scripture. As conservative Evangelical Christians, we trust in the sufficiency and truth of the Bible, confident that it accurately conveys the Word of God and provides everything needed for life and godliness (2 Peter 1:3).[1]

[1] DIFFICULTIES IN THE BIBLE UPDATED: Updated and Expanded Edition – April 11, 2012, by Edward D Andrews (Author), R. A Torrey (Author)

About the Author

EDWARD D. ANDREWS (AS in Criminal Justice, BS in Religion, MA in Biblical Studies, and MDiv in Theology) is CEO and President of Christian Publishing House. He has authored over 220+ books. In addition, Andrews is the Chief Translator of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV).