Explore the intriguing world of New Testament textual criticism with a focus on Matthew 2:18. This article analyzes the original text of the verse, comparing variants and examining their implications. Discover how ancient manuscripts and scribal practices influence our understanding of the Gospel, shedding light on the meticulous process of preserving Biblical texts.

Introduction

In the meticulous field of New Testament textual criticism, discerning the original text is paramount. This endeavor gains complexity when dealing with quotations from the Old Testament, as seen in Matthew 2:18. The verse presents textual variations, reflecting a divergence between manuscripts, raising the question of which rendering more closely aligns with Matthew’s original composition.

Manuscript Evidence and Analysis

Textual Variants Overview

1. Westcott-Hort (WH) and Nestle-Aland/United Bible Societies (NU) Reading:

   • Greek: κλαυθμὸς καὶ ὀδυρμὸς πολύς (klauthmos kai odurmos polys)
   • Translation: “weeping and great mourning”
   • Manuscript Support: Codex Sinaiticus (א), Codex Vaticanus (B), Codex Z, 0250, Family 1

2. Textus Receptus (TR) Variant:

   • Greek: θρηνος και κλαυθμος και οδυρμος πολυς (threnos kai klauthmos kai odurmos polys)
   • Translation: “lamentation and weeping and great mourning”
   • Manuscript Support: Codices C, D, L, W, 0233, Family 13, 33, Majority Text

External Evidence

The WH/NU reading is supported by some of the oldest and most reliable manuscripts, including Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus, both dating to the 4th century. These manuscripts, representing the Alexandrian text-type, are critical in establishing the original text.

The TR variant, while supported by a wider range of later manuscripts, reflects a tendency for scribes to harmonize New Testament quotes with the Septuagint version of the Old Testament. This practice was particularly prevalent from the 4th century onwards.

Internal Evidence and Historical Context

Matthew’s citation of Jeremiah 31:15 (38:15 in the LXX) shows a significant divergence from the Septuagint. This difference suggests Matthew’s independent rendering or use of a different textual tradition. The addition of θρηνος και (threnos kai, “lamentation and”) in the TR reading aligns more closely with the Septuagint but diverges from Matthew’s typical citation style.

Scribes in the 4th century and later, aware of the differences between the Septuagint and the New Testament quotes, often sought to create a standardized text by aligning the New Testament with the Greek Old Testament. This harmonization practice likely led to the insertion of the additional terms in the TR variant.

Conclusion

Considering the documentary evidence and the historical context of scribal practices, the original wording of Matthew 2:18 is more plausibly the shorter reading found in the WH/NU manuscripts: κλαυθμὸς καὶ ὀδυρμὸς πολύς (klauthmos kai odurmos polys), “weeping and great mourning.” This conclusion aligns with the documentary approach, emphasizing the Alexandrian manuscripts’ early and reliable witness. The TR variant likely represents a later scribal attempt to harmonize Matthew’s quotation with the Septuagint, reflecting a secondary development in the textual transmission rather than the Evangelist’s original expression.

About the Author

SCROLL THROUGH THE DIFFERENT CATEGORIES BELOW

BIBLE TRANSLATION AND TEXTUAL CRITICISM

BIBLE TRANSLATION AND TEXTUAL CRITICISM

BIBLICAL STUDIES / BIBLE BACKGROUND / HISTORY OF THE BIBLE/ INTERPRETATION

EARLY CHRISTIANITY

HISTORY OF CHRISTIANITY

CHRISTIAN APOLOGETIC EVANGELISM

TECHNOLOGY AND THE CHRISTIAN

CHRISTIAN THEOLOGY

CHRISTIAN DEVOTIONALS

CHRISTIAN FICTION