The transition from the scroll to the codex represents one of the most significant technological and cultural developments in the history of the transmission of the New Testament text. This shift, which occurred primarily between the first and fourth centuries C.E., not only revolutionized the way written texts were produced, preserved, and circulated but also played an essential role in the early Church’s ability to safeguard, disseminate, and authenticate the inspired writings of the apostles and their associates. Far from being a mere matter of convenience or innovation, the adoption of the codex in Christian circles had profound implications for the stability and preservation of the New Testament text. This article will explore the historical, paleographical, and textual dimensions of this transformation, analyzing how the codex became the chosen format for the Christian Scriptures and why this decision had lasting consequences for biblical textual studies.

The Scroll in the Greco-Roman and Jewish World

Before the codex, the dominant writing format across the Greco-Roman world was the scroll, typically made of papyrus sheets joined horizontally to form a roll that could extend several meters in length. Each sheet was inscribed on one side (the recto), with columns of text running perpendicular to the roll’s length. The user would unroll the scroll with one hand while rolling it up with the other, reading sequentially. In Jewish culture, the scroll held deep religious significance. The Hebrew Scriptures (Tanakh) were customarily written on scrolls of parchment or leather, and even after the rise of the codex, synagogue use of scrolls persisted due to their ritual and traditional value.

The scroll was well-suited for continuous works but presented limitations for quick reference, comparison, and multi-text collections. For instance, the Law and the Prophets had to be copied separately into different scrolls, which made study and reference cumbersome. For readers of the emerging New Testament corpus, which quickly expanded into multiple writings—Gospels, Acts, Pauline Epistles, General Epistles, and Revelation—the scroll format was less practical. The scroll’s physical limitations made it difficult to gather all apostolic writings into one physical collection.

The Origins and Development of the Codex

The codex, a bound book form composed of individual sheets stacked and fastened along one edge, was already known in the first century C.E. but was initially used for informal or utilitarian purposes such as notebooks (called pugillares). Made of wooden tablets covered with wax or bound papyrus sheets, these early codices were convenient for personal notes or drafts. However, by the mid-to-late first century C.E., a shift toward more formal literary use began. The codex offered several technological advantages: it was compact, could contain far more text than a scroll, allowed writing on both sides of the page (recto and verso), and enabled easier reference and cross-comparison of passages. Moreover, the codex’s format permitted multiple works to be bound together, providing the earliest means for producing complete textual collections—such as all four Gospels or all of Paul’s letters—in a single volume.

Christian Preference for the Codex

One of the most striking phenomena in early book history is the rapid and near-universal adoption of the codex among Christians. Whereas pagan and Jewish literature continued primarily in scroll form well into the second and third centuries, Christian texts are overwhelmingly found in codex form from the earliest surviving manuscripts. Among the earliest New Testament papyri—such as P52 (125–150 C.E.), P46 (100–150 C.E.), P66 (125–150 C.E.), and P75 (175–225 C.E.)—virtually all were produced as codices, not scrolls. This indicates that Christians, from the earliest decades of the second century, not only preferred but standardized the codex as the medium for Scripture.

This choice was not accidental. It reflects deliberate decision-making among early believers concerning the transmission and preservation of their sacred writings. The codex allowed the early Church to circulate entire collections of apostolic writings efficiently, enhancing both accessibility and textual uniformity. For example, P46, one of the oldest collections of Pauline Epistles, originally contained at least ten of Paul’s letters bound together in codex form—something that would have been practically impossible with scrolls. Likewise, P75, which contains substantial portions of Luke and John, shows that the codex was instrumental in grouping the Gospels in early collections, anticipating later canonical arrangements.

Practical and Theological Motivations for the Codex

The Christian preference for the codex had practical motivations grounded in the realities of evangelism, worship, and doctrinal instruction. Missionary expansion required durable, portable, and easily referenced texts. Codices could be produced and carried more conveniently than scrolls, making them suitable for travel and missionary work across the Roman Empire. Their compact form also made secret or discreet circulation possible during periods of persecution, especially under emperors such as Nero (64 C.E.) and Diocletian (303 C.E.), when Christian writings were targets for confiscation and destruction.

Theologically, the codex may have symbolized a new covenantal identity distinct from Judaism. While Jewish Scriptures remained bound to the traditional scroll, the Christian Scriptures emerged in a new physical form—one that represented both innovation and identity. This was not merely stylistic but reflected an early recognition of the unity of the apostolic writings as inspired Scripture. By placing multiple writings together within a single codex, early Christians were practically affirming the authority and interconnectedness of these texts.

The Role of the Codex in Canon Formation

The codex format directly facilitated the process of canon recognition and standardization. While the canon itself was determined by apostolic origin and doctrinal authority, the physical format of the codex helped solidify the perception of these texts as a unified corpus. When Christian communities could gather the four Gospels into one codex or the Pauline corpus into another, they not only simplified reading but also implicitly recognized the collective authority of those works. This material reality strengthened theological understanding.

The production of collections such as the “Fourfold Gospel” (as evidenced by Irenaeus of Lyons c. 180 C.E.) was enabled by the codex. Similarly, codices containing Pauline Epistles facilitated the dissemination of a standardized apostolic text throughout diverse congregations. The textual stability of these early codices provided a foundation for later major manuscripts such as Codex Vaticanus (B, 300–330 C.E.) and Codex Sinaiticus (א, 330–360 C.E.), both of which continued the codex tradition in majestic form, preserving nearly the entire New Testament.

Paleographical Evidence for the Early Christian Codex

The manuscript evidence underscores the early and consistent Christian use of the codex. Among the approximately 140 New Testament papyri known today, almost all are in codex form. This is statistically significant when compared to contemporary non-Christian works, where the majority remained in scroll form through the second century. Papyrological study reveals that Christian scribes were among the pioneers in refining codex construction, including folding techniques, quires, and binding methods that allowed larger collections of text.

P75, dating to 175–225 C.E., exhibits advanced codex construction and scribal precision. Its strong textual affinity with Codex Vaticanus demonstrates a stable textual tradition extending over a century of transmission. P46, dating to 100–150 C.E., likewise reveals early sophistication in layout and organization, with evidence of numbered pages—an innovation more typical of codices than scrolls. The presence of titles, section divisions, and nomina sacra (abbreviations of divine names such as ΘΣ for “God,” ΙΣ for “Jesus”) throughout these codices further reflects intentional scribal reverence and consistency.

The Codex and Textual Preservation

The codex format proved instrumental in preserving the New Testament text. Scrolls, by their nature, suffered greater wear due to continual unrolling and re-rolling. The first and last columns of scrolls, being most exposed, were prone to damage, leading to text loss and copying errors. Codices, in contrast, provided better physical protection for the text and allowed easier correction and marginal annotation. These features reduced cumulative corruption over time.

Furthermore, because codices enabled the assembly of multiple writings in one volume, they encouraged textual comparison and standardization. Scribes could readily cross-reference parallel passages among the Gospels or between letters, reducing the likelihood of variant readings proliferating unchecked. The codex thus became a tool of textual control and precision, aligning with the providential preservation of Scripture through faithful transmission rather than supernatural intervention.

The Codex in Early Church Use and Distribution

By the third century, the codex had become firmly established as the Christian format of Scripture. Church fathers such as Origen (c. 185–253 C.E.) and Tertullian (c. 155–240 C.E.) were aware of and utilized codices in their scholarly and pastoral work. Tertullian, in particular, contrasted Christian use of codices with the continued Jewish use of scrolls, seeing the codex as emblematic of a new covenantal community grounded in Christ. This distinction was not merely symbolic; it reflected a practical superiority recognized by the Church’s scribes and teachers.

During the persecution under Diocletian (303–311 C.E.), when imperial edicts ordered the destruction of Christian Scriptures, the codex format again proved advantageous. Codices could be hidden more easily than scrolls, and their compactness allowed believers to preserve entire collections of Scripture with less physical risk. When persecution ended and the Edict of Milan (313 C.E.) legalized Christianity, the codex became the standard form for scriptural production across the Roman Empire. Constantine’s commissioning of fifty deluxe copies of the Scriptures for Constantinople, likely in codex form, further cemented the format’s dominance.

The Codex and the Alexandrian Text-Type

The early Christian preference for the codex coincided with the development of the Alexandrian text-type, the textual family that most accurately preserves the original New Testament wording. The consistency between early Alexandrian papyri (P66, P75) and later majuscule codices (Vaticanus, Sinaiticus) demonstrates a transmission line marked by fidelity and careful copying. This precision was facilitated by the codex’s structure, which allowed scribes to maintain uniform columnar layouts, consistent pagination, and textual comparison across pages.

For example, P75’s close alignment with Vaticanus confirms the preservation of the Alexandrian text from the late second century through the fourth century—a span of over 150 years—without significant corruption. Such stability would have been far less likely had the text continued primarily in scroll form, with its inherent fragility and segmentation.

The Decline of the Scroll and the Triumph of the Codex

By the fourth century, the codex had entirely supplanted the scroll in Christian usage and began to dominate secular literary culture as well. The transition was so complete that by the time of Jerome (c. 347–420 C.E.), the codex was universally recognized as the standard format for Scripture. Jerome’s Latin Vulgate, prepared in codex form, further reinforced this trend throughout Western Christendom. The triumph of the codex can thus be directly linked to Christian influence, as non-Christian adoption lagged behind until the third and fourth centuries.

The codex’s supremacy marked a defining moment in textual history: it preserved the Scriptures in a form that could withstand centuries of copying and transmission with minimal distortion. Whereas the scroll belonged to an older, limited textual world, the codex represented a new era of permanence and accessibility—qualities that would safeguard the New Testament text throughout the medieval period and into the age of print.

Conclusion: The Providential Role of the Codex in Scripture Preservation

The transition from scroll to codex was more than a technological development; it was a providential factor in the preservation of the New Testament text. The codex made possible the collection, unification, and transmission of the inspired writings in a stable and enduring form. It facilitated the early Church’s recognition of canonical Scripture, enhanced accuracy in copying, and enabled the broad dissemination of the gospel message across the Roman Empire and beyond. The overwhelming manuscript evidence—from the earliest papyri to the great majuscule codices—testifies to the Christian community’s deliberate and wise choice of the codex as the vehicle of God’s written Word.

Through this early and decisive transition, the Church ensured that the original words of the New Testament were not lost to the wear of scrolls or the fragmentation of tradition. Instead, they were preserved through faithful scribes who, guided by divine providence, transmitted the sacred text in a form designed for endurance and integrity. The codex, therefore, stands as a silent witness to the enduring reliability of the New Testament text, a testimony to both human diligence and divine oversight in the preservation of Scripture.

You May Also Enjoy

A Brief History of New Testament Textual Criticism: From Irenaeus to NA28/UBS5

See more

About the Author

CLICK LINKED IMAGE TO VISIT ONLINE STORE

CLICK TO SCROLL THROUGH OUR BOOKS