
Please Support the Bible Translation Work of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV)
$5.00
The Alleged Contradiction
Critics often raise the objection that the account of Abraham naming Beersheba in Genesis 21:31 is contradicted by Genesis 26:33, which seems to state that Isaac was the one who named the place. Genesis 21:31 reads: “Therefore that place was called Beersheba, because there both of them swore an oath.” Yet Genesis 26:33 states: “So he called it Shibah; therefore the name of the city is Beersheba to this day.” The accusation is that the two accounts present irreconcilable origins for the name of Beersheba, making the narrative inconsistent.
However, a closer examination of the text, its historical context, and the Hebrew language demonstrates that these passages are not contradictory but rather complementary. What we are seeing is the recurring significance of a sacred place, in which God’s covenantal faithfulness was confirmed to successive generations.
Abraham And The Naming Of Beersheba
In Genesis 21, Abraham and Abimelech entered into a covenant after a dispute over a well. Abraham set apart seven ewe lambs as a witness to his rightful ownership of the well. The text concludes: “Therefore that place was called Beersheba, because there both of them swore an oath” (Gen. 21:31).
The Hebrew word Beersheba (בְּאֵר שֶׁבַע) means either “Well of the Oath” or “Well of Seven.” The naming was directly tied to the solemn oath (Hebrew: shaba, to swear) made between Abraham and Abimelech. This well, and the city that developed around it, became a marker of God’s blessing and a testimony to Abraham’s covenantal faith and God’s providential protection.
Thus, Beersheba’s initial naming is rooted in Abraham’s experience.
Isaac And The Reaffirmation Of Beersheba
Genesis 26 records Isaac’s struggles with the Philistines over water rights, much like Abraham had faced in his own day. Isaac re-dug the wells his father had dug, as Genesis 26:18 notes: “And Isaac dug again the wells of water which had been dug in the days of Abraham his father, for the Philistines had stopped them after the death of Abraham; and he gave them the names that his father had given them.”
Later, when Isaac’s servants dug a well and found no opposition, Isaac declared it a gift of peace from Jehovah. Verse 33 states: “So he called it Shibah; therefore the name of the city is Beersheba to this day.”
The word Shibah (שִׁבְעָה) means “oath” or “seven,” echoing the same root as the name Abraham had given earlier. In other words, Isaac was not renaming Beersheba as though it had no prior name, but was reaffirming and perpetuating its covenantal significance through his own experience.
Hebrew Linguistic Continuity
The Hebrew terminology is key. The root שבע (sh-b-ʿ) underlies both Abraham’s naming of Beersheba and Isaac’s calling the well Shibah. Abraham’s oath with Abimelech gave the place its name; Isaac’s naming of the well “Shibah” tied his own experience back to Abraham’s, showing continuity rather than conflict.
Thus, Genesis 26:33 does not say Isaac originally invented the name “Beersheba,” but that the events in his life reinforced the permanence of that name for the city. The wording “therefore the name of the city is Beersheba to this day” is a statement of the city’s ongoing identity, not an assertion that Isaac first created the name.
Ancient Near Eastern Practice Of Reaffirmation
In the ancient Near East, it was common for names to take on renewed or expanded meaning through successive events. Place names were often reaffirmed, reapplied, or deepened in significance. For example:
-
Jacob renamed Luz as Bethel after a divine encounter (Gen. 28:19), though the place already had a name.
-
Later, Jacob again named an altar at Bethel to reinforce its ongoing covenantal significance (Gen. 35:15).
-
Gideon’s altar was named Jehovah-Shalom (Judg. 6:24) to memorialize God’s peace after a unique deliverance.
These examples demonstrate that naming and renaming were not contradictions but a way of marking God’s repeated acts of faithfulness in specific locations.
The Theological Continuity Between Abraham And Isaac
The book of Genesis consistently emphasizes the transmission of covenantal blessing from Abraham to Isaac. Genesis 26:3-5 explicitly ties God’s promises to Isaac back to Abraham: “I will establish the oath which I swore to your father Abraham.” Isaac’s experience at Beersheba was a visible confirmation that Jehovah’s covenant was being carried forward in the next generation.
By connecting Isaac’s naming of Shibah to the ongoing identity of Beersheba, the biblical writer underscores continuity: the same God who blessed Abraham now blesses Isaac, and the same covenantal oath is preserved across generations.
The Defense Of Biblical Inerrancy
What critics label as a “contradiction” is in fact an instance of textual reinforcement. The naming of Beersheba occurred first under Abraham, and later Isaac’s experience tied directly back to that same covenantal root. The fact that Genesis 26:18 explicitly states Isaac re-dug Abraham’s wells and deliberately restored their names shows that Isaac respected and preserved the heritage of Abraham’s faith.
Thus, there is no rivalry between Abraham and Isaac over who named Beersheba. Instead, there is continuity of covenant memory, preserved through successive acts of faith. The phrase “to this day” highlights the enduring relevance of the name and its meaning in Israel’s history.
Conclusion
Abraham was the original namer of Beersheba, linking the place to his oath with Abimelech. Isaac, decades later, reaffirmed that name by tying it to his own well-naming episode, “Shibah,” which recalled the original root meaning of oath and seven. Far from a contradiction, this dual reference strengthens the biblical record, showing how God’s promises to Abraham were confirmed in Isaac. Beersheba thus stands as a lasting memorial of Jehovah’s covenantal faithfulness across generations.

