THE DIFFICULTY: Genesis 23 describes Abraham negotiating with the “sons of Heth,” or Hittites, to purchase the cave of Machpelah for Sarah’s burial. Yet for centuries, secular historians dismissed the Hittites as myth. Ancient records outside the Bible were silent, and scholars insisted the biblical authors had invented them or retrojected them into history long before they actually existed. Archaeology later uncovered the Hittite Empire in Anatolia (modern Turkey), showing they flourished from around 1600–1200 B.C.E., far later than Abraham’s time. Critics therefore argued that the Bible mistakenly places them centuries too early, casting doubt on the historical accuracy of Genesis.

THE CONTEXT: The Bible mentions the Hittites frequently, from Genesis through the monarchy. Genesis 10:15–16 identifies them as descendants of Heth, son of Canaan, situating them among the Canaanite nations. Genesis 23 portrays them as a settled people in Hebron, while later texts describe them as both adversaries and neighbors of Israel. Joshua speaks of the “land of the Hittites” (Josh. 1:4), and 2 Samuel 11 introduces us to Uriah the Hittite, a trusted soldier in David’s army. By Solomon’s reign, Hittites were among the subject peoples providing forced labor for Israel (1 Kings 9:20–21). In other words, the biblical narrative consistently presents them as both local inhabitants of Canaan and as part of a broader people known throughout the ancient Near East.

THE CLARIFICATION: The difficulty stems from conflating two realities: the local Hittite clans in Canaan, descended from Heth, and the imperial Hittite kingdom centered at Hattusha in Anatolia. Archaeology confirms that the Hittite Empire arose centuries after Abraham, but this does not exclude the earlier presence of Hittite-descended groups in Canaan. Genesis refers specifically to the “sons of Heth,” indicating a Canaanite branch of the broader Hittite family. Thus, Abraham’s dealings with the Hittites in Hebron fit within the genealogical and cultural framework of Genesis 10, while the later empire represents their northern relatives who eventually rose to international power.

THE DEFENSE: For centuries, critics dismissed the Hittites as biblical fiction. That changed dramatically in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. In 1876, Archibald Sayce first suggested their existence based on inscriptions in Syria. Then in 1906, Hugo Winckler’s excavation of Boğazköy (ancient Hattusha) revealed the imperial capital of the Hittites, complete with massive fortifications, temples, palaces, and over 10,000 cuneiform tablets. These tablets recorded treaties, laws, rituals, and correspondence, providing an unparalleled window into Hittite civilization. The discovery was a complete reversal for critics, who had long mocked the Bible’s repeated references to the Hittites. Far from being mythical, they were a powerful empire that rivaled Egypt, Assyria, and Babylon in the Late Bronze Age.

This evidence not only vindicated the Bible’s references but also clarified the distinction between the Anatolian empire and the local Canaanite Hittites. Abraham did not negotiate with the imperial Hittite king in Hattusha but with a settled community of Hittites in Hebron. Archaeology shows that the Hittite world was not monolithic but spread across regions, with colonies, vassals, and kin groups dispersed throughout the Levant. Thus, it is entirely plausible that Hittite clans were already present in Canaan during Abraham’s time, consistent with Genesis.

The Genesis 23 account itself reflects remarkable authenticity. Abraham’s purchase of the cave of Machpelah mirrors known Hittite and broader Near Eastern legal customs. Hittite law emphasized precise property descriptions—including fields, trees, and boundaries—to secure legal ownership. Genesis 23:17–18 carefully records these details: “So the field of Ephron in Machpelah… the field and the cave that was in it, and all the trees that were in the field… were made over to Abraham.” Likewise, the presence of witnesses and the formal payment of 400 shekels of silver align with the legal practices documented in Hittite and Mesopotamian records. These cultural and legal correspondences show that Genesis preserves a historically grounded account, not a later invention.

Abraham’s negotiations further highlight the realism of the text. Though God had promised him the land, Abraham did not seize it presumptuously. Instead, he acknowledged the Hittites’ current ownership and conducted a formal, public transaction. This reflects both humility and faith: he trusted that God’s promise would be fulfilled in time, but in the meantime he respected the lawful rights of others. His purchase became the first legally owned portion of the Promised Land, foreshadowing the inheritance of his descendants.

Archaeology also demonstrates the Hittites’ broader influence. Their empire spanned Anatolia and northern Syria, and they engaged in diplomacy with Egypt, famously recording the world’s earliest known peace treaty after the Battle of Kadesh (1274 B.C.E.) between Ramses II and Hattusili III. These treaties provide striking parallels to biblical covenants. Like Hittite suzerainty treaties, Deuteronomy contains a preamble, historical prologue, stipulations, witnesses, blessings, and curses. This structure suggests that Israel’s covenant was revealed in a form familiar to its original audience, contextualized in terms they could recognize. Thus, the rediscovery of Hittite treaties not only confirms the Hittites’ existence but also enriches our understanding of biblical covenant theology.

Theologically, the Hittites’ presence underscores both the patience and justice of God. Genesis 15:16 explains that Abraham’s descendants would return to Canaan only when “the iniquity of the Amorites [and other Canaanites] is not yet complete.” The Hittites, as part of these Canaanite peoples, were permitted to persist for centuries, demonstrating God’s longsuffering before judgment. When Israel finally entered the land, they were commanded to drive out the Hittites and other nations to preserve covenantal purity (Deut. 7:1–2). Yet even then, individual Hittites such as Uriah could be integrated into Israel’s community, illustrating God’s concern for individuals of faith despite corporate judgment.

Finally, the rediscovery of the Hittites stands as a powerful warning against arguments from silence. For centuries, critics claimed the Hittites never existed because archaeology had not yet uncovered them. But the eventual discovery of their capital and archives completely vindicated the Bible. This pattern has repeated itself with other biblical figures and places once doubted—Belshazzar, Sargon of Assyria, and the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah—all later confirmed by archaeology. Thus, the Bible consistently proves trustworthy, even when external evidence is lacking for a time.

In sum, the Hittites of Genesis 23 were real people, descendants of Heth living in Canaan, while the imperial Hittites of Anatolia represent their northern relatives who later rose to international prominence. Abraham’s negotiations with the sons of Heth reflect authentic ancient legal customs, preserved faithfully in Scripture. Archaeology has fully overturned the critics’ skepticism, confirming the Hittites’ existence and influence. Even more, the recovery of their treaties and laws deepens our understanding of biblical covenants and the cultural context of the patriarchs. Far from being an error, Genesis 23 is an accurate, historically grounded record that demonstrates once again the reliability of God’s Word.

Parallels Between Genesis 23 and Hittite Legal Texts

The discovery of the Hittite capital at Hattusha (modern Boğazköy, Turkey) in 1906 transformed the scholarly discussion of the Hittites. What was once thought to be a mythical people mentioned only in the Bible was suddenly revealed as one of the great powers of the Late Bronze Age. Excavations uncovered monumental city gates, palaces, temples, and—most importantly—tens of thousands of clay tablets. These included the famous Hittite Laws (catalogued as CTH 291–298), diplomatic treaties, and legal contracts. As O. R. Gurney observed in his classic study The Hittites, these texts demonstrate “a society of considerable sophistication, whose laws and customs correspond remarkably with the practices reflected in the biblical narratives.”

Several of these tablets reveal striking parallels with Abraham’s purchase of the cave of Machpelah in Genesis 23. One of the clearest is the requirement that land sales be conducted publicly and legally ratified before witnesses. Hittite law CTH 291 §7 states: “When a man sells a field, a house, or a vineyard, the transaction shall be witnessed in the assembly at the city gate; only then shall the buyer take possession.” Genesis 23 reproduces this same setting: “Abraham rose and bowed to the people of the land, the sons of Heth. He spoke to Ephron in the hearing of the people of the land… so the field of Ephron… was made over to Abraham as a possession… in the presence of the Hittites, before all who went in at the gate of his city” (Gen. 23:10, 18). This procedural similarity shows that the Genesis account reflects genuine ancient Near Eastern legal culture, not an imagined scenario.

The Genesis account also carefully records the detailed description of the property boundaries and its contents—“the field, and the cave that was in it, and all the trees that were in the field, which were within all the confines of its border” (Gen. 23:17). This mirrors Hittite contracts such as CTH 295 §46, which required that “the field, its trees, its vineyards, its houses, and its boundaries shall be enumerated in writing, that no dispute may arise.” Such formulaic precision is unlikely to be a coincidence. It is a hallmark of second-millennium legal practice, preserved both in Hittite texts and in the biblical record.

Another parallel emerges in the concept of feudal obligations. Hittite law distinguished between outright ownership and conditional tenure, where a buyer of land might also inherit obligations of service or tribute to a local ruler (CTH 292 §10). Abraham’s insistence on paying “the full price” of 400 shekels of silver before witnesses ensured his purchase was absolute, free of lingering obligations. By refusing to accept the land as a gift and instead insisting on a legally binding transaction, Abraham guaranteed permanent ownership in harmony with the principles of Hittite property law.

Hugo Winckler, the archaeologist who first uncovered the Hittite archives, remarked that the legal and political complexity of the Hittites was “far beyond what had previously been imagined for the ancient Near East.” The Genesis 23 narrative fits seamlessly within this legal-cultural framework. Far from being a late invention, it preserves authentic details of ancient Hittite procedure. The convergence of biblical narrative and Hittite law strengthens confidence in the historical reliability of Genesis, showing that the Bible’s depiction of Abraham’s dealings with the sons of Heth aligns with the legal realities of the second millennium B.C.E.

You May Also Enjoy

GENESIS 21:32, 34 — Who Were the Philistines Mentioned in Abraham’s Time If Secular Sources Place Them Centuries Later?

See more

About the Author

CLICK LINKED IMAGE TO VISIT ONLINE STORE

CLICK TO SCROLL THROUGH OUR BOOKS