Shariah does not treat the veil as a personal choice. It treats it as a cloth boundary line between “honor” and “shame,” obedience and rebellion, Muslim woman and “fitnah” that must be suppressed. In places where Islamic law and culture dominate, hijab, niqab, and burqa are not simply garments. They are markers of submission enforced by family pressure, police power, and, in the most brutal cases, acid and fire.

From a biblical perspective, modesty is a matter of the heart expressed in wise dress, not a weapon to control and terrorize women. Jehovah calls Christian women to adorn themselves with godliness and good works, not with a mandated uniform enforced at knifepoint. Shariah’s system of forced veiling and violent punishment for “immodesty” exposes yet again how deeply this law distorts God’s design and tramples human dignity.

Hijab, Niqab, Burqa as Shariah Mandates

The Quranic verses that Shariah uses to mandate veiling are often presented as gentle guidance. In reality, their classical interpretation turns head coverings and full-body shrouds into requirements backed by law and social coercion.

The Quran tells believing women to lower their gaze, guard their private parts, and “draw their khimar over their bosoms.” Khimar in early Arabic referred to a head covering or shawl. The verse then lists categories of men before whom women may be less covered—fathers, sons, brothers, and other close relatives. Another verse commands the wives and daughters of the Prophet and the women of the believers to “draw their jilbab close around them” when going out so that they may be recognized and not harmed.

Classical commentators interpret these verses as requiring women to cover their hair, necks, chests, and, in strict readings, everything except the face and hands—or, for some, even the face and hands as well. They argue that a woman’s beauty is a source of temptation for men and must be hidden. Fiqh manuals describe which body parts must be covered (the awrah) and in front of whom. The default assumption becomes that any part of a woman’s body or hair visible to non-mahram men is a potential source of moral chaos.

From these interpretations arise three common forms of Islamic veiling. The hijab covers the hair and often the neck, leaving the face visible. The niqab covers the face as well, leaving only the eyes. The burqa covers the entire body, including a mesh screen over the eyes. In the classical Shariah tradition, at least some form of veiling is treated as obligatory for adult women whenever they are in public or in the presence of unrelated men.

Apologists sometimes insist that hijab is a spiritual choice, a sign of devotion. But in many societies, the law and surrounding culture make “choice” a hollow word. Girls reach puberty and are told, “Now you must cover; Allah commands it; if you refuse, you disgrace the family and invite sin.” School regulations, workplace policies, and state ordinances weave Shariah interpretations into everyday life. Refusal to veil can mean expulsion, harassment, loss of employment, or worse.

Jehovah does call women to modest dress, but He never grants any human authority the right to label a woman’s uncovered hair as a moral emergency. The New Testament encourages women to dress decently and discreetly but emphasizes inner character over outward adornment. No apostle commands governments to police women’s clothing. Shariah, by contrast, writes clothing into the criminal code.

Hadith Enforcement Mechanisms

The push for veiling in Shariah is not based on Quran alone. Hadith and prophetic example play a powerful role in turning hijab, niqab, and burqa into compulsory markers of obedience.

Narrations describe Muhammad instructing women on how to cover in front of certain men. Others recount how the Prophet’s wives were secluded behind screens and veils, and how unrelated men were commanded to speak to them “from behind a curtain.” Scholars point to these reports as proof that full separation and concealment of women is the ideal. Some hadith even express praise for women who rarely leave their homes, presenting seclusion and covering together as the highest form of piety.

There are narrations in which Muhammad is said to have rebuked women for going out perfumed or dressed in ways that drew attention. Preachers expand on these reports to build an atmosphere of fear: women are told that if any part of their hair or body is visible, they carry the sin of those men who look at them. If they wear fitted clothing, bright colors, or makeup in public, they are accused of behaving like adulteresses. Hadith about women being the majority of the inhabitants of hell are sometimes wielded to underline the danger—“your beauty will drag you and others to the fire unless you cover it.”

Legal scholars incorporate these narrations into rulings that classify veiling as obligatory (wajib) or at least strongly recommended (mustahabb). They state that a woman who goes out unveiled is a public sinner and may be disciplined by her husband, family, or the authorities. The veil becomes not merely a practice of modesty but an object of law enforcement.

In the biblical model, spiritual leaders certainly admonish believers to live modestly and avoid causing others to stumble. But they do not command specific garments under threat of punishment. They appeal to the heart, urging both men and women to exercise self-control and honor one another as image-bearers of God. Shariah’s hadith-based enforcement goes in the opposite direction: it treats women’s hair and faces as problems to be solved by cloth and punishment rather than calling men to control their own eyes and hearts.

Morality Police and Vigilante Violence

When Shariah’s veiling rules move from texts into the streets, they take concrete form in “morality police” and vigilante enforcers. These are the hands that yank scarves into place, drag women into vans, or beat them in the name of preserving modesty.

In some countries, the state maintains formal religious police forces whose duties include monitoring women’s dress. Patrols walk or drive through markets, parks, and malls, stopping women whose hair shows, whose clothes are considered too tight, or whose faces are uncovered when niqab is expected. These officers may issue fines, detain women, beat them with sticks, or haul them to stations where they are lectured, humiliated, and sometimes abused. Their power rests on Shariah-based regulations that define “proper” hijab and give the state authority to impose it.

Even where the state does not maintain an official morality police, ordinary police and local officials often act as if they were such. They harass unveiled women, threaten arrest, and side with families who want to control daughters or wives. In rural areas and conservative neighborhoods, self-appointed enforcers roam the streets, shouting at women, throwing stones, or attacking them verbally for failing to meet their standards of dress. Posters and sermons urge men to “command the good and forbid the evil” by confronting “immodest” women.

Families also become enforcers. Fathers demand that daughters veil as soon as they reach puberty. Brothers police their sisters’ clothing and movements, sometimes beating them or reporting them to authorities if they resist. Husbands threaten divorce, abuse, or the loss of children if wives remove their veils or even loosen them. The woman’s body becomes a battleground where various men compete to prove their piety by how strictly they can control her.

Jehovah hates such oppression. Scripture condemns those who crush the poor and powerless under heavy burdens, especially when they do it in His name. While the Bible calls believers to encourage one another in holiness, it does not authorize any earthly force to patrol clothing with batons. Jesus rebuked religious leaders for straining out gnats while swallowing camels—obsessing over minor outward forms while ignoring justice, mercy, and faithfulness. Shariah’s morality police illustrate that same hypocrisy: they fixate on centimeters of exposed hair while ignoring the violence used to cover it.

Acid Attacks as Punishment for “Immodesty”

At the most horrific end of this enforcement spectrum are acid attacks and other forms of mutilation used against women who are perceived as immodest or defiant. While not every acid attack is explicitly religious, many occur in contexts where Shariah’s veiling norms and honor culture are dominant. The message is clear: if you will not cover your face, we will destroy it.

Acid is cheap, easily available, and devastating. When splashed on a person’s face or body, it burns through skin, muscle, and sometimes bone, leaving disfigurement, blindness, and lifelong pain. Attackers use it because it permanently marks the victim and sends a terrifying warning to others. Women who choose not to veil, who seek education, or who simply reject a suitor may find themselves targeted. In some cases, men shout accusations of “immodesty” or “Western behavior” as they hurl the liquid.

Families sometimes participate in or cover up such attacks. A father or brother who believes a daughter has disgraced the family by refusing hijab or rejecting a forced marriage may throw acid himself or arrange for someone else to do it. Afterwards, the family may blame the victim, claim it was an accident, or pressure her to remain silent to protect “honor.” The combination of Shariah’s modesty standards and honor-based thinking creates a climate in which brutal punishment for non-compliance can be rationalized as necessary discipline.

In societies with weak rule of law or Shariah-leaning courts, acid attackers often go unpunished or receive light sentences. Judges influenced by religious norms may view the victim as partly responsible because she “provoked” the attack by dressing or behaving in ways that violated expectations. Even when laws against acid violence exist, police may be reluctant to enforce them vigorously if the attacker claims religious motivation.

From Jehovah’s perspective, this is bloodguilt. The prophets denounce those who “devour” His people, tear their skin from them, and break their bones. An acid attack is a modern form of such savagery. It destroys the face Jehovah formed in the womb and inflicts a suffering that cries out to heaven. There is no imaginable justification for such acts in the Bible. Covering hair or face is never placed above a person’s bodily integrity and life.

Yet Shariah, by making modesty a near-absolute requirement and linking women’s uncovered bodies to community shame, provides a theological backdrop that some use to excuse acid and other horrors. If a woman’s uncovered face is a scandal, then a permanently scarred one can be twisted into a “lesson” for others. Only a radical return to the God who made women in His image and forbids such cruelty can expose how wicked this reasoning is.

Global Spread Through Migration and Demands for Accommodation

Forced veiling and violent enforcement are not confined to a handful of countries. Through migration and the spread of Shariah-minded movements, this mindset has traveled far beyond the borders of traditional Muslim lands. In Western cities, the battle over the veil has become a flashpoint, not only because women choose to wear it, but because some men and organizations demand that societies adjust around Shariah dress norms.

In many immigrant communities, girls raised in Western nations still face intense pressure to veil. Mothers and grandmothers warn that any deviation from Islamic dress will bring shame. Fathers and brothers act as informal morality police, forbidding certain clothes, monitoring social media, and punishing “Westernized” behavior. For some girls, the threat of being sent “back home” to be married off or disciplined hangs over every wardrobe choice. The fear of honor-based violence—beatings, forced confinement, and even homicide—shadows those who resist.

At the same time, Islamist activists push for public institutions to accommodate Shariah dress in ways that go beyond ordinary freedom of religion. They demand separate swimming hours for veiled women, segregation of men and women at events, and the right to wear face-covering niqab in contexts where facial identification is normally required. When authorities hesitate or enforce neutral rules, these activists accuse them of oppression, hoping to carve out de facto Shariah zones where Islamic norms prevail.

Western governments, eager to avoid accusations of bigotry, often respond by granting special exceptions. In some places, schools adjust uniforms for hijab, workplaces modify safety rules, and even security procedures are softened. While basic accommodation of modesty is reasonable, the deeper danger lies in legitimizing Shariah’s claim that women’s uncovered hair or faces are morally problematic. Society begins to treat Islamic dress codes not merely as personal preferences but as quasi-sacred norms that others must respect.

Meanwhile, those Muslim-background women who do not wish to veil often find little support. If they speak out against hijab or niqab as oppressive, they are accused of betrayal by their own communities and, ironically, sometimes ignored by secular feminists who are more eager to defend “Muslim identity” than to stand with dissenting women. The net effect is that the Shariah-friendly narrative about veiling gains more public ground, while former Muslims, converts to Christ, and secular ex-Muslims who know the coercive reality are sidelined.

From a Christian standpoint, the response must be both clear and compassionate. Believers should defend freedom of conscience, including the right of women to dress modestly according to their convictions. But they must also expose the Shariah logic that lies behind demands for compulsory veiling and the culture of intimidation that surrounds it. The Church cannot lend its voice to the romanticization of hijab as purely liberating while ignoring those who are beaten or scarred for refusing it.

The Gospel offers a different covering. It speaks of being clothed with Christ, of putting on compassion, kindness, humility, and love. It calls both men and women to modesty not as a means of control but as an expression of new life. Jesus never ordered acid attacks on women who did not veil. He never sent patrols to measure headscarves. He confronted lust in men’s hearts and offered rest to the weary and burdened, including women crushed by legalistic demands.

Shariah’s forced veiling system, enforced by morality police, family violence, and even acid, reveals a law that fears women’s bodies more than it fears men’s sin. It hides hair and skin while leaving rage and cruelty unaddressed. Only when people turn to Jehovah, who sees the heart and commands genuine holiness, will they understand that true modesty cannot be enforced by terror. It can only be born out of a heart transformed by His Word and by the saving work of His Son.

You May Also Enjoy

September 11, 2001: Al-Qaeda’s Jihad Against America and the Attack on the American Homeland

See more

October 7, 2023: Hamas, Iran, and the Open Jihad War Against Israel

See more

About the Author

CLICK LINKED IMAGE TO VISIT ONLINE STORE

CLICK TO SCROLL THROUGH OUR BOOKS