On a clear Tuesday morning in September 2001, four passenger jets lifted off from American airports like thousands of other flights that day. Within a few hours, three of them had become guided missiles, and the fourth lay in fragments in a Pennsylvania field. Nearly three thousand people were dead. It was the single deadliest foreign attack on the American homeland in history.

For politicians, journalists, and many religious leaders, the instinctive response was to separate the hijackers as far as possible from Islam. “This is a hijacking of a peaceful religion,” they said. “True Islam condemns terrorism.” The slogans came fast, before any serious reckoning with the facts.

Yet everything about September 11 exposes the opposite. The men who flew those planes into buildings did not act in spite of Islam’s texts and history; they acted because of them. They were steeped in Wahhabi preaching, inspired by Muslim Brotherhood ideologues, organized by al-Qaeda veterans of earlier jihads, and justified their attacks with direct quotations from the Qur’an and hadith. They saw themselves as heirs of Muhammad’s raids and the caliphs’ conquests, not as rebels against Islam.

Jehovah’s Word gives a radically different standard. The Lord Jesus commanded His disciples to love their enemies, to bless those who curse them, and to overcome evil with good. The congregation spreads through preaching, not through suicide operations and collapsing towers. Measured by Scripture, September 11 was not a religiously “misguided” act. It was a stark revelation of what happens when men take Muhammad’s model seriously in the modern world.

Recruiting the “Martyrs”: Wahhabi Indoctrination and the Saudi Hijackers

One uncomfortable fact is quietly downplayed: fifteen of the nineteen hijackers were Saudi citizens, trained in a kingdom that claims to be the purest Islamic state on earth. The others came from the United Arab Emirates, Egypt, and Lebanon—countries where Islam saturates life. These were not secularized misfits who stumbled into extremism by accident. They were products of a system.

Saudi Arabia rests on the Wahhab–Saud alliance described earlier. Wahhabi doctrine saturates its mosques, schools, and media. From childhood, Saudi boys memorize Qur’anic verses and hadith passages that divide the world into believers and unbelievers, that promise paradise to those who fight and die in Allah’s path, and that speak of Jews and Christians in harsh, vilifying language. Official textbooks for years portrayed non-Muslims as enemies and warned against befriending them. Jews were demonized as descendants of apes and pigs in some lessons; Christians were cast as corrupt polytheists.

Osama bin Laden himself grew up as a wealthy Saudi businessman’s son, educated in this environment. He did not learn jihad in a Western philosophy department; he absorbed it from Qur’an, hadith, and Wahhabi scholars. When he later turned against the Saudi royal family for what he saw as compromise with America, he did not renounce their religious foundations. He argued that he, not they, was the true continuation of Muhammad’s Islam.

Many of the 9/11 hijackers fit a pattern common in radicalization. Some were quiet, introverted young men who found in Islamist circles a sense of brotherhood and purpose. Others had experienced personal disappointments or moral failures and sought a path of “repentance” through militant piety. In Hamburg, a cell of Egyptian and Saudi students gathered around charismatic preachers who emphasized that the West was at war with Islam and that only drastic action could defend the ummah.

Wahhabi and similar Salafi teachings gave them a framework. They were told that all life belongs to Allah, that this world is a brief test, and that the highest honor is to die as a shahid—a martyr—in battle against unbelievers. Death, in that narrative, is not something to fear but to pursue. The more shocking the blow against the enemy, the greater the glory.

In their farewell videos and letters, the hijackers quote Qur’anic verses about fighting, speak of the sweetness of meeting Allah, and urge others to continue the struggle. They write of leaving “this world of deception” and entering gardens where rivers flow. Their language is almost indistinguishable from that of classical Muslim warriors heading into battle, except that their battlefield would be airplane cabins and office towers.

Jehovah’s Word never commands such thinking. The apostle Paul longed “to depart and be with Christ,” yet he did not seek death by murdering civilians. He accepted suffering inflicted on him; he did not inflict it on others to earn rewards. The 9/11 hijackers, trained in Wahhabi ideology, inverted every biblical value: they sacrificed innocent lives to purchase their own imagined paradise.

From Afghan Trenches to Manhattan Skies: The Birth of al-Qaeda’s Global War

To understand September 11, we have to follow the road back to the mountains of Afghanistan in the 1980s.

When the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan in 1979, many Muslims saw it as an assault by atheist communism on a Muslim land. Afghan resistance fighters—mujahedin—rose under local commanders. At the same time, Arab volunteers from across the Middle East traveled to join the struggle. Among them was Osama bin Laden. With his wealth and connections, he helped fund and organize training camps and guesthouses for these “Arab Afghans.” Influential clerics like Abdullah Azzam preached that fighting in Afghanistan was an individual duty for Muslims, elevating it to a sacred cause.

Western powers, especially the United States, saw these fighters as useful allies against the Soviets and provided weapons and support through Pakistani channels. But while the West thought in terms of geopolitics, many Islamists thought in terms of theology: Afghanistan was proof that jihad worked. A superpower could be humbled by believers willing to die.

When the Soviets finally withdrew and their puppet regime collapsed, the Arab fighters did not simply go home, forget jihad, and become peaceful citizens. In their own minds, they had experienced a miracle. They had seen “Allah’s soldiers” defeat a giant. They interpreted this as confirmation that the Qur’anic promises were true: those who fight in Allah’s path, even if outnumbered, can conquer.

Osama bin Laden and his circle turned their attention to a new enemy: the United States and its allies. For them, America represented a new “Crusader” power propping up “apostate” Muslim regimes (like the Saudi royal family and Egypt’s government) and supporting Israel. The question shifted from “How do we drive out the Soviets?” to “How do we drive out the Americans and topple their clients?”

In the late 1980s, bin Laden’s network coalesced into what became known as al-Qaeda—“the base.” It was not initially a single centralized organization but a loose structure of training camps, financial channels, and ideological connections. Its veterans fanned out to conflicts across the Muslim world: Bosnia, Chechnya, the Philippines, Algeria. They trained local fighters, exported tactics, and promoted a vision of global jihad.

During the 1990s, al-Qaeda tested America’s defenses. The 1993 World Trade Center bombing, carried out by men linked to the same Islamist circles, killed six and wounded hundreds, though it failed to topple the twin towers as intended. Attacks on American troops in Somalia, the 1998 bombings of U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, and the 2000 suicide bombing of the USS Cole in Yemen all came from networks tied to bin Laden and his allies.

Each success emboldened the jihadists. They saw U.S. withdrawals or cautious responses as signs of weakness. America, in their view, was a distant empire with a soft underbelly: open borders, civilian targets, and an unwillingness to absorb casualties. If they could stage a spectacular strike on American soil, they believed, the U.S. would retreat from the Muslim world, leaving local regimes vulnerable to Islamist revolutions.

Al-Qaeda’s journey from Afghan trenches to Manhattan skies was therefore not a sudden lurch into madness. It was an incremental path: fight the Soviet “near enemy,” then pivot to the American “far enemy,” always convinced that Allah was on their side. Their playbook drew from Muhammad’s own career: begin as guerrillas, build a base, and strike surprising blows at unsuspecting foes.

The church of Christ never moves this way. When the Gospel left Jerusalem, it did so through missionaries willing to die, not kill. Paul did not leave Asia Minor thinking, “We drove out the local demons; now we will attack Rome itself with assassins.” He went to Rome in chains, as a prisoner, preaching Christ to his guards. The contrast is total.

Fatwas of Fire: Quran, Hadith, and the Theology Behind 9/11

Many Western leaders claimed after 9/11 that the hijackers “betrayed Islam.” Osama bin Laden and his circle disagreed. They issued formal legal opinions—fatwas—explaining why their war was not only permitted but required by Islamic law.

In 1996, bin Laden released a declaration of war against the “American occupying forces of the land of the two holy places” (Saudi Arabia). In 1998, he and other jihadist leaders issued a more sweeping fatwa under the name of the “World Islamic Front.” It stated that killing Americans and their allies, “civilian and military,” was an individual duty for every Muslim who could carry it out. They cited Qur’anic verses that command fighting against unbelievers and drive them out from where they drove you out. They referenced the obligation to expel “Crusaders” and Jews from Muslim lands and portrayed America as the head of a global anti-Islamic campaign.

The theology behind these fatwas rests on several pillars.

First, the classic division of the world into dar al-Islam (realm of Islam) and dar al-harb (realm of war). Where sharia rules, peace among Muslims can exist; everywhere else is, in principle, a battlefield. Truces with non-Muslim powers are temporary tactics, not permanent acceptance. For bin Laden, the presence of American soldiers in Saudi Arabia after the 1991 Gulf War—invited there by the Saudi government—was intolerable precisely because it put “infidel” troops in what he saw as sacred territory that must be under pure Muslim rule.

Second, the doctrine of abrogation and the priority of “sword verses.” Early Qur’anic passages from Mecca that speak of patience and no compulsion are understood, in mainstream Islamic jurisprudence, to have been superseded by later Medinan commands to fight. Verses such as 9:5 (“kill the polytheists wherever you find them”), 9:29 (fight those who do not believe until they pay jizya), and others became central to jihadist arguments. Al-Qaeda’s ideologues did not invent this approach; they drew from centuries of tafsir (commentary) and legal manuals that treat jihad as the normal state of relations between Islam and unbelief.

Third, the concept of collective guilt. In Qur’anic logic, nations are judged corporately. The people of Noah, ‘Ad, Thamud, and others are destroyed as groups for rejecting prophets. When applied to modern democracies, this line of reasoning leads to a grim conclusion: civilians who vote for governments are partly responsible for those governments’ policies. Bin Laden argued that American civilians share blame for U.S. support of Israel and for bombings in Iraq and elsewhere. Therefore, he said, they are legitimate targets. This is why the 1998 fatwa explicitly authorizes killing Americans “civilian and military.”

Fourth, the promises attached to martyrdom. Hadith collections include traditions where Muhammad promises exceptional rewards to those who die in battle for Allah: forgiveness of sins, immediate entry into paradise, and sensual pleasures. One widely circulated hadith—though not from the most rigorous collections—speaks of seventy-two houris, pure companions, given to the martyr. The exact number is less important than the overall message: dying while killing infidels brings not only spiritual status but also sexual fulfillment in the hereafter. Jihadist recruiters press this point on impressionable young men, turning lust and aggression into “spirituality.”

All of this collides head-on with the teaching of Jehovah in Scripture. In the Bible, nations can indeed be judged, but individual responsibility before God is never erased. Prophets call sinners to repentance; they do not license vigilantes to murder civilians. The Lord Jesus specifically rejects collective vengeance when He rebukes His disciples for wanting to call down fire on a Samaritan village. The apostle Paul commands believers to leave vengeance to God, not to take it themselves.

Moreover, martyrdom in the New Testament means bearing witness to Christ even unto death, not killing others. Stephen, the first Christian martyr, dies praying for his executioners. There is no hint of him entering heaven to receive sensual rewards; his joy is to see the glory of Christ. Any “theology of martyrdom” that encourages murdering neighbors to gain paradise stands condemned by Jehovah’s Word.

Yet for the 9/11 hijackers, the fatwas of bin Laden and his scholars were not fringe opinions; they were embraced as authoritative guidance. They believed they were obeying the Qur’an and the Prophet more consistently than many of their co-religionists. And in a dark sense, they were right.

Inside the Plot: Visas, Flight Schools, and Intelligence Warnings Ignored

One of the most disturbing aspects of September 11 is how mundane much of the preparation looked. The plotters exploited normal systems—visa processes, airplane training, financial transfers—that were designed for peaceful exchange. Evil wrapped itself in ordinary forms.

Nineteen men were selected for the operation. Four pilot hijackers had enough training to control large commercial jets; the others were “muscle” hijackers tasked with subduing passengers and crew. Several of them had spent time in the Hamburg cell in Germany, where radical preaching and close friendships forged a shared commitment to martyrdom. Others came directly from Saudi Arabia or the Gulf.

They entered the United States mostly on tourist or student visas. Consular officers in some cases issued visas despite incomplete documentation or suspicious patterns, partly because procedures were lax and the men appeared clean, polite, and middle-class. None fit the stereotype of a poor, uneducated fanatic. That stereotype itself—so often repeated in the West—helped blind officials to the danger.

Once inside the country, some enrolled in flight schools in Florida and Arizona. Instructors later recalled that a few students showed little interest in learning how to land large jets. They focused on takeoffs and handling in the air. At the time, this struck instructors as odd but not as a criminal plot. No one had imagined that someone might use a passenger jet as a kamikaze weapon against skyscrapers.

The hijackers lived inconspicuously in American suburbs and motel rooms. They used banks, rented cars, went to gyms, and blended in. While they maintained a veneer of outward normalcy, some also drank alcohol and visited strip clubs, behavior that shocked those who later expected “pious fanatics.” Yet this too fits a pattern: jihadist doctrine often includes the idea that fighters’ sins are washed away by martyrdom. They can indulge the flesh before dying, confident that their final deed will redeem them. That is how twisted theology perverts even moments of hesitation into more sin.

Financially, the operation was cheap by the standards of warfare. Funds flowed through wire transfers, cash couriers, and Islamic charities linked to al-Qaeda networks. The costs of flight training, travel, and living expenses were minor compared to the damage inflicted.

Intelligence agencies had pieces of the puzzle. Warnings surfaced in the late 1990s and early 2000s that bin Laden was determined to strike inside the United States. Agents fielded tips about suspicious men seeking flight training. In August 2001, a briefing to the American president carried the blunt title, “Bin Laden Determined to Strike in U.S.” But bureaucratic walls, inter-agency mistrust, and a failure to imagine such an attack meant that the pieces were never assembled in time.

From a biblical angle, this highlights the reality of sin in two ways. First, evil often moves through the cracks of ordinary life, not just through obviously monstrous figures. The hijackers looked like normal travelers because sin is skilled at disguise. Second, complacency is deadly. Nations that enjoy long periods of security can grow dull, trusting in procedures rather than facing spiritual threats. Jehovah repeatedly warned Israel that when they felt safe and prosperous, they would be tempted to forget Him and drop their guard.

No intelligence failure, however, explains away the deeper issue: if there had been no ideology that praised men for killing themselves and others in Allah’s name, there would have been no plot to detect.

A Morning of Flames and Falling Steel: Twin Towers, Pentagon, and the War That Followed

Shortly after 8 a.m. Eastern time on September 11, 2001, the hijackers made their moves. On each of four flights—American Airlines 11, United Airlines 175, American 77, and United 93—they waited until the planes were in the air and near cruising altitude. Then, using box cutters and small knives, they surged forward, stabbed or threatened flight crew, and forced their way into cockpits. Some passengers were murdered during the struggle. The pilots were killed or incapacitated. Control of the planes passed to men who regarded the passengers not as neighbors but as expendable collateral in a holy war.

At 8:46 a.m., Flight 11 slammed into the North Tower of the World Trade Center, tearing through floors filled with workers beginning their day. The impact shredded stairwells, ignited fuel, and hurled flaming debris onto nearby streets. People in upper floors were trapped above the impact zone, with heat and smoke rising and exits cut off.

Seventeen minutes later, as cameras and onlookers focused on the burning tower, Flight 175 struck the South Tower, exploding into a ball of fire that confirmed this was no tragic accident. The second impact told the world that a coordinated attack was underway. Inside both towers, thousands of people struggled down smoky stairwells. Firefighters and police raced upward, climbing into danger in an effort to rescue those trapped.

At 9:37 a.m., Flight 77 crashed into the Pentagon, ripping through one side of the headquarters of the American military. Offices collapsed, and flames shot through corridors. The symbol of U.S. defense had been struck at its core.

On Flight 93, delayed departure time altered the pattern. By the time its hijackers seized control, some passengers had learned via phone calls what had happened in New York and at the Pentagon. Realizing that their plane would likely be used as another weapon, they banded together in the aisle. Voices on cockpit recorders capture their struggle as they tried to storm the cabin. The aircraft crashed in a field near Shanksville, Pennsylvania, at 10:03 a.m., killing everyone on board but sparing an unknown number of people at whatever building had been targeted—likely the Capitol or the White House.

Meanwhile, fires in the twin towers weakened steel structures built for conventional disasters but not for prolonged exposure to burning jet fuel. At 9:59 a.m., the South Tower collapsed, dropping in a roaring cascade of dust and debris that swallowed surrounding streets. At 10:28 a.m., the North Tower followed. In less than two hours, New York’s tallest buildings had become smoking piles of rubble. Nearly three thousand people—office workers, firefighters, police, airline crews, and passengers—were dead.

Al-Qaeda spokesmen rejoiced. They released videos praising the “martyrs” and warning that these attacks were just the beginning. Bin Laden later gloated that America now knew what it felt like to have its cities bombed, as Muslims had in Palestine and elsewhere. He presented the carnage as divine justice.

Jehovah sees it differently. He hears the cries of victims trapped in smoke, the prayers of passengers whispering Psalm-like pleas in the final seconds, the grief of families staring at empty chairs. He does not applaud collapsing towers. The God who came into our world in Christ wept at Lazarus’s tomb, even knowing He would raise him. He is not impressed by men who kill in His name; He warns that many will say, “Lord, Lord, did we not do mighty works in Your name?” and He will answer, “I never knew you.”

The human response in the United States was a mixture of heroism, confusion, and missteps. Rescue workers searched the ruins for days. Strangers lined up to donate blood. Churches filled for a season with people seeking comfort. The U.S. government launched a “war on terror,” invading Afghanistan to destroy al-Qaeda bases and topple the Taliban, then, controversially, invading Iraq in 2003 on disputed intelligence. Some policies were prudent; others were unwise or unjust. Yet even at their worst, these responses, rooted in a secular state’s attempt at self-defense, do not resemble the theology that inspired the hijackers.

The deeper war, however, is not primarily between America and al-Qaeda, or between Western nations and loose networks of militants. It is between two revelations: the Qur’an, which promises paradise for those who kill and are killed in Allah’s path, and the Gospel, which promises forgiveness for those who confess their sins and trust in Christ who died for His enemies.

On September 11, 2001, those revelations collided visibly in the sky over Manhattan and Washington. Plane cabins became the stage where young men, certain that death would usher them into gardens with rivers and companions, chanted Qur’anic verses and steered jets toward buildings filled with image-bearers of Jehovah. The difference between their creed and the New Testament is not a matter of minor interpretation; it is the difference between light and darkness.

The decades since have only confirmed this. Al-Qaeda’s heirs—ISIS, Boko Haram, al-Shabaab, and others—repeat the pattern whenever they gain territory. They do not move toward biblical compassion as they grow stronger; they move toward more open slavery, more public executions, more aggressive jihad. This is not accidental. It is the fruit of the tree.

For Christians, the response cannot be flattery or silence. Out of love for Muslims and non-Muslims alike, we must speak clearly: the god who delights in 9/11-style martyrdom operations is not Jehovah. The Prophet who modeled caravan raids and celebrated the deaths of enemies is not the same as the Son of God who stretched out His arms on a cross to save His enemies. The religion that produced September 11 is not another path up the same mountain; it is a counterfeit that must be exposed so that those trapped in it can hear the true Gospel and live.

You May Also Enjoy

Muhammad – Hunayn, Ta’if, and Tabuk: Final Consolidation Through Terror (630–631 C.E.)

See more

About the Author

CLICK LINKED IMAGE TO VISIT ONLINE STORE

CLICK TO SCROLL THROUGH OUR BOOKS