Please Support the Bible Translation Work of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV)
$5.00
 |
 |
 |
From the middle of the second century, one figure stands out as a bridge between the world of Greek philosophy and the world of the Christian congregations: Justin, usually called “the Martyr.” He was not an apostle or a prophet, and his writings are not Scripture. Yet Jehovah used him as one of the earliest and clearest voices to defend the faith publicly before Roman authorities and educated pagans.
Justin stood in a culture soaked with philosophical schools, mystery cults, and traditional myths. Christians were misunderstood, slandered, and at times violently persecuted. In this setting, he stepped forward as a converted philosopher who had found in Christ the true wisdom that all human search had only dimly anticipated. His apologies—formal defenses addressed to emperors and the Senate—and his Dialogue with the Jew Trypho became models of reasoned Christian witness.
At the same time, Justin’s life and writings remind us that even devoted defenders of the faith can carry into their new life certain assumptions from their previous world. His Platonist leanings sometimes led him to speak of the soul in ways that do not fully align with the biblical teaching that man is a soul and that death is the cessation of conscious life until resurrection. Yet, overall, his commitment to the historical reality of Christ’s incarnation, atoning death, and bodily resurrection, and his reliance on Scripture as the ultimate standard, make his work a significant milestone in the history of Christian apologetics.
 |
 |
 |
Justin’s Conversion and Philosophical Background
A Seeker in the Schools of the Greeks
Justin was born around the beginning of the second century in Flavia Neapolis, the Roman name for ancient Shechem in Samaria. His family background was pagan, likely of Greek or Roman descent, though he grew up within sight of the land where Jehovah had worked so often among Israel.
From youth, Justin was driven by a hunger for truth. He turned to philosophy, believing that through disciplined reasoning he could find knowledge of God, the soul, and the good life. He tells us, in his own writings, that he sampled several schools. A Stoic teacher left him dissatisfied because he showed no interest in the knowledge of God. A Peripatetic philosopher seemed more eager for fees than for wisdom. A Pythagorean required him to master mathematics and music before discussing divine things. Finally Justin encountered a Platonist whose teaching thrilled him.
Platonism, with its stress on the world of forms, the soul’s ascent from material things, and contemplation of the unseen, gave Justin temporary satisfaction. He began to imagine that through philosophy he approached God. He enjoyed sitting in solitary places, pondering metaphysical ideas and feeling a kind of spiritual elevation. Yet all of this remained at the level of speculation.
An Encounter on the Shore
Justin recounts that while walking along the seashore, clad in a philosopher’s cloak, he met an older man who engaged him in conversation. This stranger did not reject philosophy outright, but he probed its limits. He asked Justin whether philosophers had really found certainty about God or whether they differed among themselves. He pressed the point that human reason, no matter how refined, cannot by itself lead to a settled knowledge of the Creator.
The old man pointed Justin instead to the prophets of Israel, who had spoken by the Spirit of God and whose words had been fulfilled. He testified that these writings bore witness to Christ and that through Christ alone a person can come to the knowledge of the true God and to everlasting life. The prophets, he explained, were not speculating but speaking as instruments of Jehovah.
This encounter shook Justin’s confidence in philosophy as the highest path. He later wrote that “a flame was kindled” in his soul as he listened. He began to read the Scriptures of Israel and to learn about Jesus, who had fulfilled prophecy, died for sins, and risen from the dead. The solidity of historical revelation, contrasted with the shifting sands of philosophical opinion, convinced him that biblical faith offered the sure ground he had sought.
Conversion and Baptism
Justin eventually embraced Christ as Lord and Messiah. He was immersed in the name of the Father, the Son, and the holy spirit, leaving behind his former life. Yet he did not discard his philosophical training entirely. Instead, he saw Christ as the fulfillment of whatever was true in philosophy. He continued to wear the philosopher’s cloak, not as a sign of allegiance to Plato, but as a way to engage those who still sought wisdom in the schools.
He traveled widely, apparently visiting Ephesus and eventually settling for a time in Rome. In each place he engaged Jews, pagans, and heretics in discussion, arguing that the prophets and apostles, not the philosophers, offered the reliable knowledge of God. His study of Scripture deepened. He came to see that the Old Testament and the apostolic writings form one unified revelation centered in Jesus the Messiah.
Justin’s own account of his journey reveals his conviction that Christianity is not a blind leap but a reasonable faith grounded in fulfilled prophecy and eyewitness testimony. He never pretended that philosophy could add to revelation; at best, philosophy had glimpsed partial truths that Christ, the Logos of God, clarified and completed.
 |
 |
 |
Defense Before Roman Authorities
Writing to the Emperor
In the middle of the second century, Christians faced repeated outbreaks of persecution. Sometimes imperial policy, such as that of Trajan, declared that simply bearing the name “Christian” was punishable if one refused to sacrifice to the gods. At other times, local hostility stirred mobs to demand the execution of believers as “atheists” who refused to honor the gods of the empire.
Justin, moved by concern for the congregations and for justice, wrote his First Apology, a formal defense of Christians, addressed to Emperor Antoninus Pius, his adopted sons (including Marcus Aurelius), and the Roman Senate. He did not flatter them; he appealed to their sense of justice and their responsibility to rule according to reason.
He argued that Christians should not be condemned merely for their name. If they had committed actual crimes—murder, theft, treason—these should be demonstrated and punished. But if their only offense was worshiping Christ and refusing to sacrifice to idols, then the state was punishing righteousness and rewarding superstition.
Justin emphasized that Christians pray for the emperor and for the empire. They are taught to obey earthly rulers in all things that do not conflict with the commands of Jehovah, to pay taxes, and to live as peaceable citizens. Far from being rebels, they are among the most dependable members of society. Their refusal to worship the emperor is not hatred of Rome but loyalty to the one true God.
Description of Christian Worship and Life
One of Justin’s most valuable contributions in the First Apology is his detailed description of Christian worship and morals. Seeking to counter rumors of cannibalism, incest, and secret crimes, he lays out what believers actually do when they assemble.
He explains that on the “day called Sunday” they gather in one place, where memoirs of the apostles and writings of the prophets are read. The presiding brother then exhorts the congregation to imitate these teachings. The group prays, and then bread and a cup mixed with water are brought. The leader gives thanks to God through Christ, and the people respond with “Amen.” The elements are distributed by servants to those present and carried to those who are absent.
Justin stresses that only those who believe the truth of the gospel, have been cleansed by baptism, and live as Christ commanded participate in this remembrance. He insists that the bread and cup are received as a memorial of Christ’s body and blood, given for the ransom of many, and that they are offered with thanksgiving rather than with any magical view of transformation.
He also describes baptism as immersion in water in the name of the Father, the Son, and the holy spirit, following instruction and commitment. This immersion symbolizes new birth, forgiveness, and illumination by the truth. Infants are not mentioned; those baptized are learners who have consciously turned from sin and embraced Christ.
Regarding moral life, Justin states that Christians are taught to love their enemies, to refrain from sexual immorality, to care for orphans and widows, and to share their goods with those in need. They do not expose infants; they do not attend gladiatorial shows; they desist from sorcery and idolatry. All of this, he argues, shows that the gospel produces a transformed way of life, not the secret crimes alleged by slanderers.
The Second Apology: Responding to Injustice
Justin’s Second Apology, written after renewed outbreaks of persecution in Rome, addresses specific cases of injustice. He recounts examples of believers condemned purely for confessing Christ and describes philosophers who stir up hatred against Christians while living hypocritically themselves.
He appeals again to reason and fairness. Punishing people solely for their confession, without evidence of wrongdoing, he says, contradicts the very Roman ideals of justice that emperors claim to uphold. He warns rulers that they will answer before God for how they use their power, whether to reward virtue or to sanction evil.
At the same time, Justin does not speak as if the safety of the church ultimately depends on imperial favor. He acknowledges that persecution comes and goes but insists that no earthly power can destroy the faith, because it is grounded in the risen Christ. He reminds his readers that if Christians were plotting rebellion, the empire would have already been overthrown, since believers are spread throughout the provinces. Their peaceful endurance demonstrates that they are not rebels but witnesses.
Eventually, Justin himself fell victim to the very injustices he had condemned. A rival philosopher, jealous of his influence, denounced him to the authorities. Refusing to sacrifice to the gods, Justin and several companions were condemned to be scourged and beheaded. He thus sealed his apologies with his blood, showing that his defense of Christianity was not a mere academic argument but a confession for which he was willing to die.
 |
 |
 |
Engagement With Pagan Myths and Accusations
Exposing the Morality of the Gods
Justin did not merely plead for fair treatment; he challenged the foundations of pagan religion. In his apologies he points out the immoral behavior attributed to the gods in Greek myths. Zeus commits adultery; Apollo deceives; Hermes steals. If such stories are true, he argues, these beings are unworthy of worship; if they are false, then the poets and sculptors have misled the people.
He presses the inconsistency of condemning Christians for moral purity while honoring deities whose tales involve drunkenness, revenge, and cruelty. How can those who worship such gods accuse Christians of undermining morality when Christians are called to imitate a holy God who forbids adultery, hatred, and injustice?
Justin further argues that demons, fallen angels who rebelled against Jehovah, stand behind the idols. These spirits, he says, inspired the myths in order to draw humans into fear and bondage. By promoting sacrifices, lustful rituals, and superstitious practices, they kept people from knowing the true God. The coming of Christ exposed and defeated these demons; the name of Jesus, he notes, drives them out when believers call upon Him.
Answering Charges of Atheism and Disloyalty
Because Christians rejected idols and refused to worship the emperor, they were called “atheists.” Justin embraces this label in a qualified way: Christians are indeed atheists with respect to such gods, but they worship the one Creator, Jehovah, who made heaven and earth and who raised Jesus from the dead.
He explains that calling Christians atheists simply because they do not participate in sacrifices is like accusing philosophers of impiety when they critique popular religion. If the empire tolerates philosophical criticism of the gods, it should at least investigate whether Christian worship is directed to the highest God rather than to demons.
Regarding political loyalty, Justin emphasizes that Christians do not seek to overthrow governments. They recognize the emperor as appointed by God for the temporal ordering of society. They pray that he may have wisdom and govern in peace. Yet they cannot obey commands that require idolatry. In insisting on this distinction, Justin reinforces the principle that obedience to earthly rulers is limited by the higher obligation to obey Jehovah.
Engaging Philosophical Ideas
Justin also engages Greek philosophy directly. He acknowledges that some philosophers, especially Plato and the Stoics, grasped partial truths about the divine, moral law, and the rational order of the universe. He attributes these insights to the work of Christ, the Logos, who is the true Reason and Word of God.
According to Justin, the Logos has sown “seeds of the Word” throughout humanity. Whenever a philosopher has spoken truthfully about justice, morality, or the divine, he has done so because the Logos, who would later become incarnate as Jesus, enlightened him to that extent. However, this partial enlightenment never rises to the full truth. Only in Christ, who is the Logos made flesh, do we find the complete revelation of God.
Justin uses this concept to show that Christianity is not irrational or anti-philosophical. Rather, it is the fulfillment and correction of the best insights of philosophy, just as the New Testament fulfills and clarifies the Old. Yet Justin never suggests that reason can judge or modify revelation. Once Christ has spoken through Scripture, His Word stands as the final authority.
 |
 |
|
Christ as the Fulfillment of Prophecy
Appeal to the Old Testament
A central pillar of Justin’s apologetic is the claim that Jesus is the fulfillment of the prophecies given through the Old Testament. Against both Jews who rejected Jesus as Messiah and pagans who dismissed Christianity as a new superstition, Justin argued that the events of Christ’s life, death, and resurrection had been foretold centuries earlier.
In the Dialogue with Trypho, Justin debates a learned Jew in Ephesus. Whether Trypho is a composite figure or based on an actual encounter, the dialogue reflects real disputes between the church and the synagogue. Trypho insists that Christians misread the Scriptures and that the Messiah has not yet come. Justin responds by presenting a chain of prophecies.
He points to predictions that the Messiah would be born from a virgin, that He would come from the tribe of Judah and the house of David, that He would preach good news, heal the sick, suffer rejection, be pierced, and rise again. He sees in the suffering servant passages of Isaiah a clear portrait of Christ’s atoning death for the sins of His people.
Justin also emphasizes the prophetic announcement that the nations would turn to the God of Israel. The fact that Gentiles throughout the Roman Empire were abandoning idols to worship the God revealed in the Scriptures through Jesus, he argued, fulfilled predictions that the knowledge of Jehovah would spread beyond Israel to the ends of the earth.
The Logos and the Angel of Jehovah
In his explanation of Christ’s person, Justin develops the concept that the pre-incarnate Son, the Logos, appeared in Old Testament times as the Angel of Jehovah and as the Word who spoke with Abraham, Moses, and the prophets. He insists that the God who is seen and heard in these manifestations is distinct from the invisible Father yet fully divine.
This line of argument allowed Justin to maintain both the unity of God and the distinction between Father and Son. When the Scripture says that no one has seen God at any time, Justin interprets this as referring to the Father; those appearances where individuals see God, he assigns to the Logos. In this way, he lays early groundwork for later, more precise Trinitarian formulations, while still remaining anchored in biblical categories.
He is careful to affirm that the Logos truly became flesh in Jesus, that He took on real humanity, and that He suffered and died in that humanity. Justin therefore stands in continuity with the apostolic insistence that Jesus came in the flesh and that denial of His humanity marks the spirit of antichrist.
Prophecy and the Resurrection Hope
Justin also uses prophecy to defend the doctrine of bodily resurrection and future judgment. Against philosophers who denied resurrection and imagined the soul ascending to a purely spiritual realm, Justin emphasizes that God created the body and will redeem it. He points to passages that speak of the restoration of the righteous and of a renewed earth under the rule of the Messiah.
While his own Platonist background sometimes leads him to speak imprecisely about the soul’s state between death and resurrection, Justin never abandons the biblical hope that Jehovah will raise the dead and judge all people by Christ. He understands that eternal life is a gift, not a natural possession of the soul. The final destiny of the righteous is to live in resurrected bodies, whether in heavenly glory for those who share Christ’s royal rule or on a restored earth for the broader company of the righteous.
In all these ways, Justin’s appeal to prophecy underscores that Christianity is rooted in history. It is not an isolated message but the climactic chapter in Jehovah’s long dealings with Israel and the nations.
 |
 |
 |
The Continuing Legacy of His Reasoned Defense
A Model of Apologetic Engagement
Justin’s life and writings established patterns that would influence Christian apologetics for centuries. He demonstrated that believers can address rulers and philosophers with calm, rational argument without compromising their loyalty to Scripture.
He showed that defending the faith involves both negative and positive work: exposing the inconsistencies and moral failures of rival systems, and presenting the coherence and transformative power of the gospel. He did not rely on clever rhetorical tricks; he relied on facts—fulfilled prophecy, eyewitness testimony to Christ’s resurrection, and the observable moral change in the lives of believers.
His willingness to describe Christian worship and practice gave the outside world a clearer view of what the congregations actually believed and did. This transparency helped counter rumors and showed that Christians had nothing to hide. In modern terms, he practiced an “open book” approach: the church’s doctrine and life can stand the light.
 |
 |
 |
Strengths and Limitations
From a conservative evangelical standpoint, Justin’s strengths are many. He upholds the authority of the Old Testament as the Word of Jehovah. He treats the Gospels and apostolic letters as inspired Scripture. He confesses the full deity and real humanity of Christ and stresses His atoning death and resurrection as the heart of salvation. He calls for repentance, baptism, and a life of holiness empowered by the Word.
At the same time, we must recognize limitations that arise from his background. His Platonist framework sometimes pushes him toward language about the soul that does not fully reflect the Bible’s teaching that man is a soul, that the dead are unconscious in Sheol until resurrection, and that eternal life is a gift granted only in Christ. Later theologians, building on some of his assumptions, would develop doctrines of an inherently immortal soul that overshadowed the biblical focus on resurrection.
Moreover, his Logos theology, though moving in an orthodox direction, occasionally blends philosophical categories with biblical revelation in ways that later generations had to refine carefully. We appreciate Justin best when we see him as a transitional figure—leaving behind philosophy to follow Scripture, yet still working out all the implications of this shift.
 |
 |
|
Encouragement for Today’s Defenders of the Faith
Despite these limitations, Justin’s overall legacy is powerfully instructive. He reminds us that apologetics is not an optional hobby but a necessary aspect of Christian witness in a world that misunderstands and even hates the gospel. Peter’s command to be ready to give a defense to everyone who asks for a reason for the hope in us finds early fulfillment in Justin’s work.
He also shows that believers can engage the intellectual currents of their age without being swallowed by them. Justin spoke the language of his culture but refused to surrender the uniqueness of Christ or the final authority of Scripture. He treated pagan myths and philosophies with respect where they contained partial truths, yet he never softened the biblical verdict that idols represent demons and that human wisdom, unaided by revelation, cannot save.
Finally, Justin’s martyrdom seals his testimony. His apologies are not the detached essays of an academic who merely debates ideas; they are the confession of a man who knew he might be executed for what he wrote and who ultimately did die for Christ. His blood, like that of many other martyrs, became a witness that the gospel is worth more than life itself.
For Christians today, living in societies where Christ is again mocked, misrepresented, or ignored, Justin’s example calls us to combine deep immersion in the Scriptures with thoughtful engagement of our culture’s questions. We are to expose falsehoods, answer accusations, and proclaim that Jesus is Jehovah’s Son, crucified and risen, the only Savior and coming King.
The same Lord whom Justin served still reigns. He continues to use reasoned defenses, Spirit-empowered preaching, and faithful living to draw people out of darkness into His marvelous light. In that work, Justin Martyr remains a companion and a reminder that the Word of God, proclaimed with clarity and backed by a life willing to suffer, is still “the power of God for salvation to everyone who believes.”
 |
 |
 |
You May Also Enjoy
About the Author
CLICK LINKED IMAGE TO VISIT ONLINE STORE
