Please Support the Bible Translation Work of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV)
$5.00
 |
 |
 |
From the very beginning, the path of Early Christianity ran through hostility. The crucifixion of Jesus the Messiah was not an isolated injustice; it was the opening blow in a continuing conflict between the kingdom of God and the unbelieving world. The same forces that opposed Christ—Herodian rulers seeking political security, religious leaders defending their influence, and Roman officials protecting imperial order—soon turned against His followers.
Yet this opposition never took Jehovah by surprise. Jesus had warned His disciples that the world would hate them because it had hated Him first, and that some of them would be handed over to councils, flogged in synagogues, and brought before governors and kings for His sake. These events were not sent by God as “tests” in the sense of arbitrary hardships; they arose from human sin, demonic deception, and a world system lying in the power of Satan. Still, Jehovah overruled them to advance His purposes, spread the good news, and purify the congregations.
In this article we remain within the early decades described in Acts and the apostolic writings, tracing the persecution that arose under Herod Agrippa I, the hostility of the Sanhedrin, the repeated legal confrontations before Roman administrators, and the scattering of believers. Each section shows how Jehovah preserved His people and used their suffering as a means of growth rather than defeat.
 |
 |
 |
Herod Agrippa I and the Death of James
The Herodian Dynasty and Political Calculation
Herod Agrippa I was the grandson of Herod the Great, who had ruled Judea as a client king under Rome at the time of Jesus’ birth. Unlike his grandfather, who was partly Idumean and widely distrusted by many Jews, Agrippa had closer ties with Jewish identity and sought to present himself as a defender of Jewish interests. He had spent years in Rome, developed relationships with emperors in the Julio-Claudian line, and eventually received authority over territories that reunited much of Herod the Great’s former kingdom.
By the early 40s C.E., Agrippa ruled Judea, Samaria, Galilee, and other regions. To maintain favor with Rome, he had to keep order. To maintain favor with his subjects, he had to show zeal for their traditions. The growing movement of believers in Jesus, centered in Jerusalem but spreading outward, threatened both calculations. Many Jewish leaders resented the apostles’ claim that Jehovah had raised Jesus from the dead and made Him both Lord and Messiah. If Agrippa could strike this movement, he would win applause from influential groups in Jerusalem.
The Execution of James the Son of Zebedee
Against this backdrop, Acts records that Herod Agrippa “laid violent hands on some who belonged to the congregation.” He arrested James the son of Zebedee, one of the Twelve and brother of John. James had been among the inner circle present at the raising of Jairus’ daughter, the transfiguration, and Jesus’ agony in Gethsemane. He was a prominent witness of the resurrection and a powerful preacher of the kingdom.
Agrippa executed James with the sword, almost certainly by beheading. This was the first recorded execution of an apostle. Stephen had previously been stoned by a mob acting with the council’s approval, but James’ death was a formal act of state power. For the believers, this was a deeply painful blow. One of the original eyewitnesses chosen by Jesus had been put to death. Clearly, following the Messiah could cost a person his life.
The narrative emphasizes Agrippa’s motive: when he saw that killing James pleased the Jews—especially those opposed to the apostolic message—he proceeded further. Political ambition, not zeal for truth, drove his actions. Sinful human fear and desire for applause produced murderous violence against a faithful servant of Christ.
Herod’s Pride and Jehovah’s Judgment
Agrippa’s campaign did not stop with James. He arrested Peter, intending to execute him after the Passover season. That episode will be considered below. For now, it is enough to note that Agrippa’s persecution was part of a larger pattern of arrogance and self-exaltation. Later, when he appeared in splendid royal garments before an audience in Caesarea and spoke to them, the crowd shouted that his voice was that of a god and not of a man. Instead of rebuking this flattery and giving glory to Jehovah, Agrippa accepted it.
Scripture records that an angel of Jehovah struck him because he did not give glory to God, and he died, eaten by worms. The one who used his sword against Christ’s servant was himself destroyed under divine judgment. At the human level, Agrippa’s aim had been to crush the congregation; at Jehovah’s level, his reign was short and his end humiliating. The Word of God continued to grow and multiply.
The death of James and the fall of Herod teach that martyrdom is not evidence of defeat. James’ execution did not cancel his witness; it sealed it. Jehovah does not promise His servants escape from all physical danger, but He does promise that no earthly ruler will finally frustrate His purposes.
 |
 |
 |
The Trials of Peter and the Deliverance of Jehovah
First Arrest: Peter and John Before the Council
Opposition to the apostles began long before Herod Agrippa’s actions. Soon after Pentecost, Peter and John healed a lame man at the Beautiful Gate of the Temple. The miracle drew a crowd, and Peter proclaimed that Jehovah had glorified His Servant Jesus, whom the people had rejected and handed over to be killed. He called them to repent so that their sins might be wiped out.
The priests, the captain of the Temple, and the Sadducees were annoyed because the apostles were teaching the people and proclaiming in Jesus the resurrection from the dead. They arrested Peter and John and held them in custody until the next day. This first arrest was driven by religious leaders jealous for their influence and threatened by the message of resurrection, which undercut the Sadducean denial of future life.
The next day, the apostles were brought before the Sanhedrin, the highest Jewish council. Asked by what power or in what name they had done this, Peter, empowered by holy spirit, boldly declared that the healing had been accomplished in the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, whom they had crucified and whom God had raised from the dead. He affirmed that there is salvation in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved.
The council recognized the courage of these formerly ordinary fishermen and noted that they had been with Jesus. After conferring, they realized they could not deny the miracle, since the healed man stood before them. They therefore resorted to threats, commanding the apostles not to speak or teach at all in the name of Jesus. Peter and John replied that they must obey God rather than men, for they could not stop speaking about what they had seen and heard.
Released with further threats, they returned to the congregation, which responded by praying for boldness, not for the removal of all opposition. Jehovah shook the place where they were gathered and gave them courage to continue speaking the Word.
Second Arrest: Imprisonment and Angelic Release
As the apostles continued to teach and heal, the high priest and Sadducees became increasingly jealous. They arrested the apostles and put them in the public prison. During the night, however, an angel of Jehovah opened the doors, brought them out, and told them to go stand in the Temple and speak to the people all the words of this life.
At daybreak, the apostles obeyed, teaching again in the Temple courts. When the council convened and sent to the prison, they discovered it securely locked but empty. Report came that the men they had imprisoned were standing in the Temple teaching the people. The officers brought them without violence, fearing the crowd.
Before the council, the high priest accused them of disobeying the strict orders not to teach in Jesus’ name and of intending to bring His blood upon them. Peter and the apostles answered with the same principle as before: “We must obey God rather than men.” They testified that the God of their fathers had raised Jesus, whom the council had killed by hanging Him on a tree, and that He had been exalted as Leader and Savior to grant repentance and forgiveness of sins. They declared that they and the holy spirit (speaking through them) were witnesses to these things.
Enraged, members of the council wanted to kill them, but Gamaliel, a respected Pharisee, advised caution. He reminded them of previous movements that had collapsed when their leaders died and argued that if this movement were of human origin it would fail, but if it were of God they would not be able to overthrow it. The council accepted his counsel in part: they flogged the apostles, ordered them again not to speak in the name of Jesus, and released them.
The apostles left rejoicing that they had been considered worthy to be dishonored for the Name. They did not allow the beating to silence them. Day after day, in the Temple and from house to house, they did not cease teaching and announcing Jesus as the Messiah.
Third Arrest: Peter and the Night of Deliverance Under Herod
Years later, under Herod Agrippa I, Peter again faced imprisonment, this time with execution clearly intended. After Agrippa executed James, he arrested Peter during the days of Unleavened Bread, intending to bring him out after the Passover feast. Peter was guarded by four squads of soldiers, chained between two guards, with sentries at the doors. Humanly speaking, escape was impossible.
The congregation responded with earnest prayer to Jehovah for Peter. One night, as he slept, an angel of Jehovah suddenly stood by him, and a light shone in the cell. The angel struck Peter on the side, woke him, and told him to get up quickly. The chains fell from his hands. He was told to dress and follow. Passing the guards and the iron gate, which opened by itself, they entered the street, and the angel departed. Peter initially thought he was seeing a vision, but once outside he realized that Jehovah had truly sent His angel and delivered him from Herod and from all that the Jewish people were expecting.
Peter went to the house where many were gathered in prayer. A servant girl named Rhoda recognized his voice at the gate and, in her joy, left him standing outside while she ran to announce his arrival. Those inside were slow to believe her, thinking she had seen a messenger. When they finally opened the door and saw Peter, they were amazed. He explained how Jehovah had brought him out of prison and told them to inform James (the brother of the Lord) and the other brothers. Then he departed to another place.
Herod, discovering the escape, interrogated the guards and put them to death before leaving for Caesarea, where his own judgment from Jehovah awaited.
These repeated arrests and rescues show both sides of Jehovah’s dealings. James was executed; Peter was delivered. Both outcomes fit within His wise plan. He does not guarantee identical earthly outcomes for all His servants, but He does promise that nothing, not even imprisonment or death, can separate them from His love or prevent the spread of His Word.
 |
 |
 |
Opposition From the Sanhedrin
The Council as Religious and Political Power Center
The Sanhedrin, composed of chief priests, elders, and scribes, functioned as the highest Jewish council in religious and many civil matters. Under Roman rule its authority was limited, especially regarding capital punishment, but it remained the central body that guarded the traditions of the fathers and oversaw Temple life. The council included Sadducees, who dominated the high priestly families, and Pharisees, who were influential teachers of the Law.
When the apostles proclaimed Jesus as the risen Messiah, they directly challenged the Sanhedrin’s previous decision to condemn Him as a blasphemer and agitator. If Jehovah had raised the One they had delivered to Pilate, then the council’s judgment had been profoundly wrong. The miracles done in Jesus’ name and the bold preaching in the Temple confronted them with that reality.
Patterns of Hostility: Threats, Floggings, and Judicial Hearings
The early chapters of Acts reveal a clear pattern. First came interrogations and threats, as in the case of Peter and John after the healing of the lame man. When threats failed to silence the apostles, the council escalated to imprisonment and flogging, as seen in the second arrest. These floggings were severe, leaving backs torn and bleeding, but the apostles accepted them as part of the cost of loyalty to Christ.
The council accused the apostles of defying their authority and of filling Jerusalem with teaching about Jesus’ blood. The apostles responded that obedience to Jehovah must outweigh obedience to human authorities whenever the two collide. They did not deny the council’s role in Jewish society, but they refused to allow that role to include suppression of the gospel.
Later, Stephen was brought before the council on charges that he spoke against the Temple and the Law. False witnesses claimed he said that Jesus would destroy the Temple and change the customs Moses handed down. In his defense, Stephen recounted Israel’s history, emphasizing how the people had repeatedly resisted Jehovah’s messengers. He declared that the Most High does not dwell in temples made with hands and accused the council of being stiff-necked, uncircumcised in heart and ears, always resisting the holy spirit by rejecting the prophets and now the Righteous One.
Enraged, they dragged him out of the city and stoned him, with Saul standing by in approval. Stephen’s face, like that of an angel, and his prayer for his killers echoed the spirit of Jesus Himself. The Sanhedrin, entrusted with interpreting the Law, thus placed itself in direct opposition to Jehovah’s saving work.
A Minority Response: Priests and Council Members Who Believed
Despite the council’s official hostility, not all its members remained unbelieving. Acts notes that a great many priests became obedient to the faith as the word of God spread in Jerusalem. Gamaliel, though not recorded as a believer, at least counseled caution. Later, a number of Pharisees who had believed brought their perspectives into the great debate about Gentile circumcision, showing that some who had been part of the religious establishment now followed Jesus.
Nicodemus, who had earlier visited Jesus by night, and Joseph of Arimathea, a council member who did not consent to Jesus’ condemnation, provided honorable burial for the crucified Messiah. These examples show that while the council as a body opposed the gospel, Jehovah still called individuals within it to Himself. Persecution was driven by groups and structures, but grace reached specific hearts.
 |
 |
|
Roman Administrators and Legal Challenges
Roman Law and the Status of the Congregation
The Roman Empire prided itself on law and order. Local customs were often tolerated, provided they did not undermine loyalty to Rome or disturb public peace. Judaism enjoyed a recognized legal status as an ancient religion; synagogues were permitted, and Jewish communities often had certain exemptions, such as from military service or emperor worship.
In the earliest decades, Roman officials tended to see the followers of Jesus as part of the broader Jewish community. Disputes about the Messiah appeared to them as internal religious controversies. This perception sometimes allowed believers to benefit from the legal protections granted to Jews, yet it also drew them into conflicts where civic peace was threatened by hostile synagogue leaders.
Roman administrators were not usually interested in theological details. Their main concerns were riots, sedition, and loyalty to Caesar. The apostles and other believers had to show that their proclamation of Jesus as Lord and Messiah did not entail rebellion against lawful authority.
Gallio at Corinth: A Legal Turning Point
During Paul’s ministry at Corinth, Jewish opponents brought him before the proconsul Gallio, accusing him of persuading people to worship God contrary to the Law. From their standpoint, Paul’s message about salvation by faith in the risen Christ undermined the centrality of the Law of Moses and threatened synagogue authority.
Gallio, however, recognized the nature of the dispute. He dismissed the case, saying it concerned questions about words, names, and Jewish law, matters he was not willing to judge. He drove them from the tribunal. This decision, though brief, set an important precedent. It signaled that Roman courts would not treat the proclamation of Jesus as a criminal offense per se.
Gallio’s refusal to criminalize the gospel provided a measure of protection for believers in that region. It did not end all hostilities—Jewish leaders could still stir up mobs—but it meant that, at least officially, Rome saw the dispute as internal to Judaism and unsuitable for criminal prosecution. Jehovah used a pagan official’s sense of jurisdictional limits to safeguard the mission.
Paul’s Arrest in Jerusalem and Appeals to Roman Justice
Later, when Paul returned to Jerusalem bearing gifts for the poor and participating in Temple rites to avoid misunderstanding, opponents from Asia stirred up the crowd by accusing him of teaching against the people, the Law, and the Temple and of bringing Gentiles into the inner courts. A riot broke out, and Roman soldiers intervened to prevent Paul from being killed.
The tribune Claudius Lysias arrested Paul, initially assuming he was a dangerous agitator. When he discovered that Paul was a Roman citizen by birth, he became cautious. Roman citizenship carried significant legal privileges, including protection from flogging without trial and the right to appeal to Caesar. Paul made use of these rights, not to avoid all suffering—he had already endured much—but to ensure that his case advanced the gospel.
Brought before the Sanhedrin, Paul perceived the division between Sadducees and Pharisees and declared that he was on trial for the hope of the resurrection. This statement sparked internal conflict within the council and led to another uproar. Learning of a plot to ambush and kill Paul, the tribune sent him by night with a large military escort to Caesarea, where the governor Felix resided.
Felix heard the charges brought by Jewish leaders and Paul’s defense that he worshiped the God of his fathers, believed everything written in the Law and Prophets, and had a hope in God of resurrection for both the righteous and the unrighteous. Felix delayed judgment, hoping for a bribe, and kept Paul in custody for two years while often conversing with him about faith in Christ.
When a new governor, Festus, took office, Jewish leaders again pressed charges, seeking to have Paul transferred to Jerusalem so they could ambush him. Festus suggested a trial in Jerusalem, but Paul, recognizing the danger and exercising his rights, appealed to Caesar. This appeal compelled Festus to send him to Rome. Before doing so, he consulted Herod Agrippa II, who listened to Paul’s testimony and concluded that the man could have been set free if he had not appealed to Caesar.
Through these legal proceedings, several truths emerge. First, the central issue in Paul’s hearings was consistently his proclamation of Jesus’ resurrection and lordship, not political rebellion. Second, Roman officials repeatedly found no basis for the death penalty, acknowledging that the accusations were religious in nature. Third, Paul’s citizenship and appeals became means by which Jehovah brought him to Rome, the heart of the empire, so that he could bear witness there.
Roman Custody as a Platform for the Gospel
Paul’s final imprisonment in Rome, as recorded in Acts, did not silence him. He lived under house arrest, guarded by a soldier, but was allowed to receive visitors and continue preaching the kingdom of God and teaching about the Lord Jesus Christ with all boldness and without hindrance. Members of Caesar’s household heard the gospel; letters written from prison strengthened congregations in Asia Minor and elsewhere.
Thus Roman custody, intended to restrict a perceived troublemaker, became a platform for spreading the message. The empire could chain the messenger but not the Word of God. Jehovah used legal challenges and imperial bureaucracy as instruments for the wider advance of salvation.
 |
 |
 |
The Scattering of Believers and Purposes of Persecution
Scattering After Stephen and Beyond
The stoning of Stephen marked a turning point. A “great persecution” arose against the congregation in Jerusalem, and all except the apostles were scattered throughout the regions of Judea and Samaria. Devout men buried Stephen and made great lamentation over him, but the movement did not collapse. Those who were scattered went everywhere proclaiming the Word.
Philip’s ministry in Samaria, the conversion of the Ethiopian official, and the beginnings of witness in Phoenicia, Cyprus, and Antioch all sprang from this scattering. The forced dispersal of believers, caused by hostility from religious leaders and fueled by Saul’s zealous efforts to destroy the congregation, became the means by which the message crossed ethnic and geographic barriers.
Later, scatterings continued under other pressures. Some believers left Judea because of famine and economic hardship; others fled specific incidents of persecution. Wherever they went, they carried the good news of the crucified and risen Messiah. Congregations formed in cities of Syria, Asia Minor, Greece, and beyond.
Purposes of Persecution in Jehovah’s Plan
Persecution has multiple sinful sources: the hatred of Satan and demons toward Jehovah’s purposes, the envy and fear of religious leaders who resist truth, the pride and insecurity of rulers who fear losing power, and the moral darkness of societies that love their own ways. None of these sources are from God. Yet Jehovah is never defeated by them. He uses what His enemies mean for harm to bring about good.
First, persecution purifies the congregations. When following Christ becomes costly, superficial affiliation fades. Those who remain show that their loyalty is real. Hypocrisy like that of Ananias and Sapphira is exposed and judged; genuine faith is refined.
Second, persecution loosens the self-satisfied comfort of believers. The Jerusalem congregation might have been tempted to remain clustered near the Temple, enjoying their fellowship and the favor they at first enjoyed. Hostility forced them outward, fulfilling Jesus’ commission to be witnesses in Judea, Samaria, and to the ends of the earth. Congregations today, reading these accounts in the Spirit-inspired Word, are reminded that comfort is not the measure of faithfulness.
Third, persecution provides platforms for testimony. Arrests bring believers before councils, synagogues, governors, and kings. In those settings they can bear witness that Jesus is the Messiah and that Jehovah raised Him from the dead. Peter before the Sanhedrin, Stephen before the council, and Paul before Felix, Festus, Agrippa, and eventually Caesar’s representatives all demonstrate how legal and social pressures can turn into opportunities for proclamation.
Fourth, persecution points forward to the final vindication of Jehovah’s people. When believers suffer for righteousness, they share in the pattern of their Lord, who was rejected before being exalted. They are reminded that their hope does not rest in present safety but in future resurrection. Death is gravedom, not continued conscious existence; but Jehovah will raise those who belong to Christ to life in His kingdom. Those who abuse and kill God’s servants will face judgment and, if unrepentant, everlasting destruction in Gehenna.
 |
 |
 |
The Ongoing Call to Boldness and Trust
The early chapters of Christian history show that persecution is normal in a world alienated from God. Yet the response of the first believers is consistently marked by prayer, boldness, mutual support, and unwavering confidence in Jehovah’s sovereignty. They do not seek suffering for its own sake, nor do they compromise the message to avoid it.
They pray for courage to speak, not merely for danger to disappear. They share possessions so that no one among them is in desperate need. They rejoice that they are counted worthy to suffer dishonor for the Name. They continue to devote themselves to the apostles’ teaching, knowing that only the Word of God can sustain faith under pressure.
In all of this, they follow the pattern of their Master, who endured hostility and death at the hands of sinful men, entrusting Himself to the One who judges righteously. The persecutions under Herod, the Sanhedrin, and Roman governors stand as reminders that the kingdom of God advances, not by avoiding conflict with a wicked world, but by faithful witness in the midst of it. Jehovah’s people may be scattered, imprisoned, or killed, but His Word runs swiftly, and His purposes cannot fail.
 |
 |
 |
You May Also Enjoy
About the Author
CLICK LINKED IMAGE TO VISIT ONLINE STORE
