
Please Support the Bible Translation Work of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV)
$5.00
The period from 313 to 590 C.E. marks a critical and deeply consequential transition in the history of Christianity. The once-persecuted Church, marked by apostolic purity and congregational integrity, began to absorb the influence of imperial politics, Greco-Roman customs, and human traditions. This era—though not yet the full development of Roman Catholicism—laid its foundations. While Christianity gained legal and social acceptance under Constantine and his successors, it also began to suffer theological decline and structural deformation, moving away from the New Testament pattern toward centralized hierarchy and doctrinal compromise.
The End of Persecution: The Edict of Milan (313 C.E.)
In 313 C.E., the Roman Emperor Constantine and his co-emperor Licinius issued the Edict of Milan, officially granting religious toleration to Christians throughout the empire. The age of open persecution—at least by the state—had ended. For over two centuries, believers had been hunted, imprisoned, and executed for their fidelity to Christ (cf. Revelation 2:10; Acts 14:22). Now, the doors to imperial favor swung open.
While some rejoiced at the newfound peace, the long-term implications proved spiritually hazardous. The Church, once alien to worldly power, began to participate in it. Constantine claimed to be a Christian and granted favors to Church leaders, donated property, and called together bishops to resolve theological disputes. The sword of persecution had been replaced with the golden scepter of patronage—and with it came seduction.
The Council of Nicaea (325 C.E.) and Its Aftermath
Constantine’s intervention in theological matters is best seen in the Council of Nicaea (325 C.E.). This council was convened to address the Arian heresy, which denied the full deity of Jesus Christ. Arius, a presbyter from Alexandria, taught that Christ was a created being, not eternal. This heresy directly contradicted John 1:1–3, 14 and Colossians 2:9.
The Nicene Creed that emerged from the council affirmed the deity of Christ, proclaiming Him as “begotten, not made, being of one substance with the Father.” While the affirmation of biblical truth here was vital, the precedent of an emperor presiding over theological decisions introduced an unbiblical and dangerous pattern. Political authority was now being used to settle doctrinal disputes—something completely foreign to apostolic Christianity.
Over time, state-backed orthodoxy became more about political unity than Scriptural faithfulness.
Theodosius I and the Establishment of a State Church (380 C.E.)
By the end of the fourth century, the fusion of Church and Empire was formalized. Emperor Theodosius I declared Christianity the official state religion in 380 C.E. through the Edict of Thessalonica. Not just any Christianity, but specifically the form sanctioned by the bishops of Rome and Alexandria.
This was a turning point. Christianity was no longer simply tolerated—it was enforced. Dissenters were not only heretics but enemies of the state. Pagan temples were closed, non-Trinitarian sects were outlawed, and the Church began to wield the sword through civil authority. Yet this alliance of throne and altar contradicted the teachings of Christ, who declared, “My kingdom is not of this world” (John 18:36).
The Rise of Episcopal Power and the Bishop of Rome
The early Church had been governed by local bodies of plural elders (Acts 14:23; Titus 1:5). Each congregation was autonomous, and no single bishop held power over others. However, with the growth of the state Church, a hierarchical structure emerged. Prominent bishops from major cities—Rome, Alexandria, Antioch, Jerusalem, and Constantinople—became known as patriarchs. Among these, the bishop of Rome began to claim superiority.
This elevation was gradual but unmistakable. Roman bishops appealed to their city’s connection with Peter and Paul, asserting jurisdictional primacy. However, such claims were unsupported by Scripture. Peter never functioned as a pope, and Paul consistently affirmed the equality of apostles and elders (Galatians 2:6–9; 1 Peter 5:1–3).
As early as the late fourth century, bishops of Rome were intervening in other churches’ affairs and claiming doctrinal authority beyond their biblical mandate. This institutional pride marked a departure from the humility of Christ (Matthew 20:25–28) and the servant-leadership of the apostles.
Doctrinal Deviations: A Shift from Scripture to Tradition
With growing power came growing corruption. By the fifth and sixth centuries, the Church’s visible leadership was already teaching and practicing doctrines not found in Scripture, including:
1. Baptismal Regeneration
By this time, many taught that baptism itself, rather than repentance and faith, conferred spiritual life. This departed from the apostolic teaching that baptism is a symbol of identification with Christ (Romans 6:3–5) and is preceded by repentance (Acts 2:38).
2. Veneration of Relics
Christians began to revere the bones, clothing, and personal items of martyrs, believing they possessed supernatural power. This syncretized pagan superstition with Christian terminology. Scripture never condones such practices (Exodus 20:4–5; Isaiah 8:19–20).
3. The Cult of Mary
Though still in its early form, this period saw the emergence of Mariolatry. Mary was increasingly viewed not just as the mother of Jesus, but as a spiritual intercessor. This directly contradicted 1 Timothy 2:5, which states that “there is one God and one mediator also between God and men, the man Christ Jesus.”
4. Elaborate Ritualism
Biblical worship—marked by simplicity, congregational singing, and exposition of Scripture—was being replaced by ornate ceremonies, priestly robes, incense, and chants, imported from imperial court protocol. The participatory worship of the early Church gave way to spectator religion, mediated by an elite clergy.
5. Clericalism and the Loss of the Priesthood of All Believers
The New Testament teaches that every believer is a priest (1 Peter 2:9; Hebrews 10:19–22), with direct access to God through Christ. But in this era, a clerical caste emerged—bishops, priests, and deacons—who alone were viewed as fit to perform the sacraments. This divided the body of Christ and laid the groundwork for sacramentalism and eventually transubstantiation.
The Deterioration of Church Discipline and Holiness
With the Church now socially and politically powerful, nominal Christianity increased. Many joined the Church not out of true conversion, but because it was politically or socially advantageous. The clear moral standards of the apostolic community (cf. 1 Corinthians 5:1–13) were replaced with political accommodation and worldly compromise.
The holiness that once marked the Church—evidenced by martyrdom, separation from idolatry, and disciplined fellowship—was now diluted. Leadership appointments became entangled in political alliances and imperial approval. Simony (the buying and selling of ecclesiastical offices) became commonplace.
Summary: The Seeds of Apostasy
While not yet the full-blown Roman Catholic Church of the medieval period, this era laid the structural and doctrinal groundwork for it. It was an age where imperial favor replaced persecution, and tradition began to replace Scripture. Christ’s Church was no longer distinct from the world—it was becoming entangled with it.
Still, God preserved a remnant. Faithful elders, teachers, and believers continued to cling to the apostolic Gospel, even amid rising darkness. But the distortion had begun. What began as a pure movement empowered by the Spirit and grounded in Scripture was being reshaped by worldly ambition, false doctrine, and imperial entanglements.
As Paul warned the Ephesian elders:
“I know that after my departure savage wolves will come in among you, not sparing the flock; and from among your own selves men will arise, speaking perverse things, to draw away the disciples after them.” (Acts 20:29–30, UASV)
This sobering prediction was becoming reality. The imperial Church had traded persecution for prestige—but at great theological cost.

