The Shishak Victory Relief, carved upon the south wall of the Great Temple of Amun at Karnak in ancient Thebes, stands as one of the most vivid pieces of monumental evidence corroborating the biblical account of Pharaoh Shishak’s campaign against the southern kingdom of Judah. This event, dated to approximately 925 B.C.E., took place during the reign of King Rehoboam, the son of Solomon. The biblical record in 1 Kings 14:25–26 and 2 Chronicles 12:1–9 describes how Shishak came up against Jerusalem, plundering the treasures of the temple and the royal palace. Archaeology, epigraphy, and historical synchronisms together confirm this biblical event, affirming both its historicity and its significance within the early monarchic period of Judah.

The Historical Context of Shishak’s Campaign

Following the division of the united monarchy after Solomon’s death in 931 B.C.E., Rehoboam inherited the southern kingdom of Judah, while Jeroboam I ruled over the ten northern tribes of Israel. Jeroboam had previously fled to Egypt during Solomon’s reign, where he received refuge under Pharaoh Shishak, the founder of Egypt’s Twenty-Second Dynasty. Upon Solomon’s death, Jeroboam returned, establishing his own kingship over Israel in defiance of Rehoboam’s authority. This political upheaval created a fractured kingdom, weakening the once-powerful state that had controlled trade routes from the Red Sea to the Mediterranean.

Pharaoh Shishak (the biblical Shishak, Egyptian Shoshenq I) ruled Egypt from approximately 945 to 924 B.C.E. He was of Libyan descent and founded a new dynasty following the decline of Egypt’s earlier New Kingdom strength. His campaign into Canaan was likely motivated by both political and economic interests: to reassert Egyptian influence over the Levant, to secure trade routes through the Negev and Shephelah, and perhaps to support his former ally Jeroboam against Rehoboam, who remained loyal to the Davidic covenantal line centered in Jerusalem.

The Biblical Record of Shishak’s Invasion

The inspired Scriptures provide the theological and historical framework for understanding Shishak’s invasion. First Kings 14:25–26 records: “In the fifth year of King Rehoboam, Shishak king of Egypt came up against Jerusalem. He took away the treasures of the house of Jehovah and the treasures of the king’s house; he took everything. He also took all the shields of gold that Solomon had made.” The parallel account in 2 Chronicles 12 provides further moral and spiritual context, noting that Rehoboam and Judah had abandoned Jehovah’s law, leading to divine discipline through foreign invasion. Yet when Rehoboam and the princes of Judah humbled themselves, Jehovah did not permit their complete destruction (2 Chronicles 12:5–12).

This event marks the first recorded instance in the divided kingdom where divine retribution came through a foreign power, serving as a covenantal warning. Archaeology has demonstrated that Egypt’s incursion was not a mere localized raid but a comprehensive military campaign extending deep into the Judean and Israelite territories.

The Karnak Relief: Physical Description and Significance

The Shishak Victory Relief occupies the southern exterior wall of the Bubastite Portal of the Temple of Amun at Karnak, near Luxor. The relief depicts Shishak standing triumphantly before the god Amun, presenting rows of bound captives representing conquered cities. Above each captive figure is a hieroglyphic name-ring identifying the city or region subdued by the Egyptian forces. Though weathered by time, over 150 name-rings can still be identified, revealing an extensive campaign that swept through both the northern and southern kingdoms.

The iconography follows traditional Egyptian victory scenes: the pharaoh smites his enemies before the deity who grants him victory. However, the significance of this particular relief lies not in its artistic form but in its geographical scope and correlation with the biblical narrative. The relief includes names from the Negev, the Shephelah, and the hill country of Judah—precisely the regions vulnerable to an Egyptian advance from the south.

The List of Conquered Cities and Their Correlation to the Biblical Account

Among the name-rings preserved on the relief, many have been securely identified with known Canaanite and Israelite towns. Sites such as Aijalon, Megiddo, Beth-Shean, and Taanach are clearly listed, indicating that Shishak’s campaign extended well beyond Judah into the northern territories. However, what is striking is the absence of the name “Jerusalem.” While some critics have seized upon this omission to question the biblical account, this argument fails when considered within the conventions of Egyptian royal inscriptions. Pharaohs rarely listed cities from which they received tribute or submission rather than outright conquest. Thus, the omission of Jerusalem aligns perfectly with the biblical report that Shishak took treasure from the temple and palace—implying surrender and payment of tribute rather than destruction.

Furthermore, the inclusion of numerous Judean towns such as Gibeon, Socoh, and Adoraim reveals that Judah indeed suffered significant military pressure. The relief thereby provides the most extensive extra-biblical confirmation of a military event directly corresponding to a biblical narrative during the early divided monarchy.

Archaeological and Epigraphic Corroboration

Excavations throughout Israel and Judah have revealed destruction layers and Egyptian artifacts datable to the tenth century B.C.E., consistent with the timeframe of Shishak’s campaign. At Megiddo, an Egyptian stela fragment bearing Shoshenq I’s cartouche was discovered, providing a direct archaeological link between the Karnak relief and Canaanite territory. Similarly, evidence from sites in the Negev and Shephelah reflects Egyptian influence and military movement during this same period.

The epigraphic style of the Karnak relief matches the early Libyan period of Egypt’s Twenty-Second Dynasty, and the names of the captured towns exhibit Semitic linguistic patterns consistent with tenth-century Hebrew and Canaanite toponymy. This alignment of linguistic, archaeological, and textual data powerfully reinforces the reliability of the biblical chronology.

Theological Implications of Shishak’s Invasion

From a theological perspective, the invasion of Shishak illustrates Jehovah’s sovereignty over the nations and His use of foreign powers as instruments of discipline upon His covenant people. Judah’s apostasy following Solomon’s death—marked by idolatry and moral decline—brought divine judgment through Egypt’s advance. Yet Jehovah’s mercy was evident in that He allowed Judah’s preservation, showing that His covenant with David remained intact.

This episode also demonstrates the precision of biblical prophecy and covenant theology. The Mosaic covenant had explicitly warned that if Israel turned aside from obedience, Jehovah would raise up enemies to oppress them (Deuteronomy 28:25). Rehoboam’s generation experienced this warning firsthand. Nevertheless, the partial deliverance following their repentance affirmed that Jehovah’s promises of restoration remained available to the humble and contrite.

Shishak and the Divided Kingdom’s Geopolitical Landscape

The campaign of Shishak also reshaped the geopolitical balance of power in the southern Levant. Egypt’s incursion weakened both Israel and Judah, reducing their capacity for expansion and military defense. The resulting vacuum paved the way for the rise of Aram-Damascus in the north and the Philistine resurgence along the coastal plain. For Judah, the loss of temple and royal treasures was both an economic and symbolic blow, signaling the decline from Solomon’s era of prosperity to an age of vulnerability and moral testing.

Shishak’s invasion thus marks a turning point in biblical history—the end of the Solomonic golden age and the beginning of a long series of foreign incursions that would culminate centuries later in the Babylonian exile. Yet through each event, the pattern of divine sovereignty and covenantal faithfulness remained evident, demonstrating that no earthly power could nullify Jehovah’s purposes for His chosen people.

The Lasting Legacy of the Shishak Victory Relief

The Karnak relief remains a monumental witness to the convergence of biblical revelation and archaeological testimony. It stands as one of the earliest extra-biblical inscriptions naming specific Israelite sites and providing a visual record of the divided monarchy’s early history. For the student of biblical archaeology, the Shishak relief confirms not only the factuality of 1 Kings 14 and 2 Chronicles 12 but also the broader reliability of the biblical historical framework.

In the broader context of ancient Near Eastern history, Shoshenq I’s campaign represents Egypt’s final major assertion of power into Canaan before its decline in subsequent centuries. The relief at Karnak therefore not only marks a key intersection between Egyptology and biblical studies but also testifies to the divine orchestration of history, in which Jehovah uses the rise and fall of nations to accomplish His purposes.

Through this relief, modern archaeology provides a silent yet eloquent affirmation of Scripture’s accuracy. The stones of Karnak cry out, bearing testimony to events that the inspired record had preserved faithfully for nearly three millennia. The Shishak Victory Relief thus stands as both a historical monument and a theological reminder—that Jehovah’s Word endures unshaken amid the ruins of empires.

You May Also Enjoy

The Tel Zayit Abecedary — c. 1020 B.C.E.

See more

About the Author

CLICK LINKED IMAGE TO VISIT ONLINE STORE

CLICK TO SCROLL THROUGH OUR BOOKS