Please Support the Bible Translation Work of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV)
$5.00
 |
 |
 |
Introduction: The Authority of John’s Witness
The Apostle John, the son of Zebedee and brother of James, was among Jesus’ closest disciples. Known as “the disciple whom Jesus loved” (John 13:23), he was present at pivotal events such as the Transfiguration (c. 32 C.E.), the crucifixion (33 C.E.), and the resurrection appearances. John wrote the Gospel of John (98 C.E.), three epistles (1–3 John, 98 C.E.), and Revelation (96 C.E.). His writings are often described as deeply theological, filled with spiritual depth, and written in profound simplicity. Yet these very qualities make his works among the most challenging and misunderstood in the New Testament. Critics allege contradictions with the Synoptic Gospels, charge John with over-spiritualization, and struggle with his use of symbolic language, particularly in Revelation. When interpreted through the historical-grammatical method, however, John’s teachings prove to be consistent, practical, and firmly anchored in the truth of Jesus Christ.
John on the Word Made Flesh
John 1:1 declares, “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.” This verse is one of the most debated in Scripture. Critics argue John presents a contradiction between Jesus being with God and being God. However, the Greek text clarifies: pros ton theon (“with God”) emphasizes personal distinction, while theos ēn ho logos (“the Word was God”) affirms shared divine essence. Verse 14 reveals the Word became flesh, meaning Jesus, fully divine, entered human history. This teaching, though challenging, defends both the deity and incarnation of Christ.
 |
 |
 |
John on Being “Born Again”
In John 3:3, Jesus told Nicodemus, “Unless one is born again he cannot see the kingdom of God.” Critics mock this as nonsensical. Nicodemus himself misunderstood it as physical rebirth. Jesus clarified in John 3:5 that this new birth is “of water and the Spirit.” John records this teaching to show the necessity of spiritual regeneration, not through ritual but through God’s Spirit operating through His Word (1 Peter 1:23). The new birth is essential for salvation, explaining the radical transformation demanded of all believers.
John on the Bread of Life
John 6:53–54 records Jesus’ statement: “Unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you.” Many abandoned Him at this teaching (John 6:60, 66), and critics today call it grotesque. Yet Jesus explains in John 6:63, “The words that I have spoken to you are spirit and life.” To “eat” and “drink” is to believe in and internalize His atoning sacrifice. John emphasizes faith’s necessity, using vivid language to depict personal appropriation of Christ’s work.
 |
 |
 |
John on Eternal Security and Abiding in Christ
John 10:28–29 records Jesus’ promise: “I give them eternal life, and they will never perish, and no one will snatch them out of my hand.” Critics claim this contradicts warnings about falling away (John 15:6). Yet the tension is resolved by recognizing John’s emphasis on abiding. Eternal life is secure in Christ, but the reality of salvation is evidenced by continual abiding in Him (John 15:4–5). John affirms both divine preservation and human responsibility in a harmonious balance.
John on Love and Truth
John’s epistles emphasize love repeatedly: “Beloved, let us love one another, for love is from God” (1 John 4:7). Critics dismiss this as sentimental, while others claim John undermines doctrinal truth by focusing on love. Yet John balances love with truth, warning against false teachers (2 John 10–11). For John, love without truth is hypocrisy, and truth without love is harshness. His teaching calls for a love grounded in God’s revelation, not in human emotion.
 |
 |
 |
John on Confessing Sin
1 John 1:9 states, “If we confess our sins, He is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.” Some critics argue this contradicts passages affirming believers’ cleansing in Christ (1 John 1:7). Yet the verse addresses ongoing fellowship, not initial justification. Believers, though cleansed, continue to struggle with sin and must confess to maintain restored fellowship with God. John upholds both the completeness of Christ’s atonement and the ongoing necessity of confession.
John on Sinlessness and Contradiction
1 John 3:9 declares, “No one born of God makes a practice of sinning.” Critics charge this contradicts 1 John 1:8, “If we say we have no sin, we deceive ourselves.” The resolution lies in context. John uses present tense in 3:9, indicating continual, unbroken sinning. Believers may stumble, but they do not live in habitual, unrepentant sin. John distinguishes between the reality of sin’s presence and the impossibility of a lifestyle dominated by sin for true believers.
 |
 |
 |
John on Antichrist
John alone uses the term “antichrist,” writing in 1 John 2:18, “Many antichrists have come.” Critics expect one singular Antichrist figure. Yet John clarifies that “antichrist” refers broadly to any who deny Christ (1 John 2:22). While Revelation anticipates future figures of opposition, John emphasizes the present reality of false teachers embodying the spirit of antichrist. This teaching remains relevant as denial of Christ persists throughout history.
 |
 |
 |
John on the Nature of Eternal Life
In John 17:3 Jesus defines eternal life: “that they know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom you have sent.” Critics argue John reduces eternal life to knowledge. Yet “knowing” in biblical terms means relational intimacy, not mere intellectual grasp. John emphasizes that eternal life begins in relationship with God through Christ, extending into eternity. His teaching harmonizes the experiential and eternal aspects of salvation.
 |
 |
 |
John on Symbolism in Revelation
Revelation, written c. 96 C.E., is among the most difficult texts in Scripture. Critics argue its symbolic imagery defies interpretation. Yet John himself explains much of the symbolism. For example, lampstands represent churches (Revelation 1:20), and the dragon is Satan (12:9). The book’s apocalyptic style conveys truth through vivid imagery. Proper interpretation recognizes Old Testament roots and John’s theological emphasis: Christ’s ultimate victory over evil and the promise of a new heavens and new earth.
 |
 |
 |
John on the Final Judgment and the Lake of Fire
Revelation 20:14–15 describes the lake of fire as the final destiny of the wicked. Critics claim this imagery contradicts God’s love. Yet John emphasizes that this judgment reflects God’s holiness and justice. The “second death” signifies complete and eternal destruction, not temporary punishment. John’s vision portrays the ultimate end of rebellion against God, consistent with Christ’s warnings in the Gospels.
 |
 |
 |
John on Worship and the Supremacy of Christ
Revelation 5 presents worship of the Lamb, who is worthy to open the scroll. Critics allege this creates polytheism by distinguishing the Lamb from God. Yet John’s vision shows the Lamb (Christ) sharing in God’s throne and worship, affirming His deity. Far from dividing worship, John reveals Christ as central to the divine plan of redemption.
Conclusion: The Depth of John’s Teaching
The Apostle John’s writings, though filled with challenging and misunderstood statements, reveal profound truth when carefully studied. His Gospel emphasizes Christ’s deity and humanity, his epistles balance love and truth, and Revelation unveils God’s final purposes. John’s teachings are not contradictory or obscure but are consistent with the whole of Scripture, demanding careful attention and reverent study.
 |
 |
 |
You May Also Enjoy
About the Author
CLICK LINKED IMAGE TO VISIT ONLINE STORE
