Please Support the Bible Translation Work of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV)
$5.00
 |
 |
 |
Introduction
Shia Islam represents one of the two main branches of Islam, the other being Sunni Islam. While many today approach this division as mere theological nuance within a shared religion, the reality is far more serious. Shia Islam stems from a deep political and religious schism that emerged immediately after the death of Muhammad in 632 C.E., one that has developed into a robust yet theologically errant sect built on human tradition, speculative theology, and historical grievances. For the biblical apologist, understanding Shia Islam is essential—not to affirm it or find common ground—but to expose its deviation from divine truth and evaluate it through the lens of God’s inerrant, inspired Word. Shia Islam not only fails the test of prophetic fulfillment but contradicts the essential teachings of Scripture concerning the nature of God, authority, revelation, and salvation.
The Origin of Shia Islam: A Schism Rooted in Political Succession
Shia Islam was not formed during Muhammad’s lifetime. It was birthed in the political chaos following his death. Unlike the biblical tradition, where God’s appointments are unmistakable and unchallenged—Moses to Joshua, or David’s anointing through Samuel—Islam lacked divine succession. The Quran gives no guidance on leadership following Muhammad’s death. Thus, disputes arose.
Shia Islam emerged from the faction that believed leadership should remain within Muhammad’s family—specifically through his cousin and son-in-law, Ali ibn Abi Talib. Ali’s followers became known as the Shi‘atu Ali, or “Party of Ali,” eventually shortened to Shi‘a. They rejected the legitimacy of the first three caliphs—Abu Bakr, Umar, and Uthman—viewing Ali as the rightful successor from the outset. This was not a disagreement over a minor doctrinal matter; it was a fundamental rejection of the legitimacy of the early Islamic caliphate.
Historically, this diverging path solidified in 661 C.E. with the assassination of Ali and the rise of the Umayyad Caliphate. The defining moment for Shi‘a identity came in 680 C.E., with the martyrdom of Ali’s son, Husayn ibn Ali, at the Battle of Karbala. This became the theological and emotional cornerstone of Shia Islam, leading to a perpetual martyrdom narrative, which continues to dominate Shia thought.
 |
 |
 |
Core Doctrines of Shia Islam
The Doctrine of the Imamate
The most distinguishing and erroneous doctrine in Shia Islam is that of the Imamate. While Sunni Muslims hold that the leader of the ummah (community) should be chosen through consensus (shura), Shia theology asserts that Imams are divinely appointed and infallible successors to Muhammad. These Imams are viewed as not merely political leaders but as sinless, divinely guided spiritual authorities. This is in direct contradiction to biblical theology, where only Jesus Christ is described as the sinless mediator between God and man (Hebrews 4:15; 1 Timothy 2:5).
According to the Twelver Shia sect (the largest branch of Shia Islam), there were twelve Imams, beginning with Ali and ending with Muhammad al-Mahdi, who is said to have entered occultation in 874 C.E. and will return as a messianic figure. This doctrine—akin to Gnostic esotericism—completely lacks prophetic basis and mirrors the flawed systems found in other apocalyptic sects, such as the Watchtower’s failed expectations or early millenarianism.
The Concept of Occultation and the Mahdi
Shia Islam teaches that the twelfth Imam did not die but was hidden by Allah and will return as the Mahdi—a messiah-like figure. This mirrors, and grotesquely distorts, the biblical expectation of Jesus’ Second Coming (Acts 1:11). Scripture teaches that the Messiah has already come once in the person of Jesus Christ and will return visibly, powerfully, and finally (Revelation 19:11-16). The notion of a hidden imam contradicts biblical eschatology and lacks historical substantiation.
The Role of Suffering and Martyrdom
Central to Shia practice is the annual commemoration of Ashura, which mourns the martyrdom of Husayn. This has evolved into ritualistic grief, self-flagellation, and excessive emotionalism, emphasizing human suffering in a way that distorts the biblical doctrine of suffering and redemption. While Scripture affirms the value of enduring suffering for righteousness (1 Peter 4:12-14), it never promotes ritualized mourning or man-made ceremonies. Salvation is not secured or advanced through public displays of sorrow but through personal faith in Christ’s atoning sacrifice.
 |
 |
 |
Shia Hadith and Their Theological Consequences
Unlike the Sunni reliance on the Sahih Bukhari and Sahih Muslim collections, Shia Islam has its own distinct hadith collections, such as Kitab al-Kafi by Al-Kulayni. These sources contain numerous teachings that are inconsistent, contradictory, and often grotesquely imaginative when compared to the Quran or biblical truth. For example, Shia hadith often elevate the Imams to semi-divine status, attributing to them pre-existent knowledge, the ability to forgive sins, and the authority to intercede—offices clearly reserved for Christ alone (Colossians 1:16-20; Hebrews 7:25).
These spurious traditions and their acceptance as part of divine authority betray the Shia elevation of human writings and fallible men over the inspired Word of God. Such theological deviations produce a distorted view of salvation, divine authority, and the role of religious leadership.
Shia Islam’s View of Scripture and Prophethood
Shia Islam, like Sunni Islam, holds to the Quran as the central religious text, yet they also harbor suspicions that the Quran may have been altered or compiled improperly, especially during the time of Uthman. Such a position is self-defeating. If one claims to follow a book that is potentially corrupted, then all theological conclusions drawn from it are equally suspect.
The Bible, by contrast, is founded on manuscript integrity, prophetic consistency, and historical corroboration. From Genesis to Revelation, Scripture maintains a consistent theological and historical narrative with over 5,898 Greek manuscripts of the New Testament and thousands of Hebrew manuscripts of the Old Testament supporting it. No Shia claim regarding the Quran’s integrity withstands the bibliographical scrutiny that Scripture endures and passes.
 |
 |
 |
Theological Contradictions with the Word of God
God’s Nature
Shia theology, like broader Islamic theology, embraces an impersonal, distant deity who communicates arbitrarily and withholds assurance of salvation. The God of Scripture—Jehovah—is personal, relational, and consistent in character. Exodus 34:6 declares Him as “compassionate and gracious, slow to anger, and abounding in lovingkindness and truth.” He is not capricious or unknowable.
Moreover, Islam denies the triune nature of God, which is central to biblical truth (Matthew 28:19; John 1:1-14). To reject the deity of Christ is to fundamentally oppose the Gospel itself (John 8:24).
Christology
Shia Islam acknowledges Jesus (‘Isa) as a prophet but denies His deity, His crucifixion, and His resurrection—core truths of the Christian faith. The Quran (Surah 4:157) erroneously claims, “they did not kill him, nor did they crucify him, but it was made to appear so to them.” This is flatly contradicted by overwhelming historical evidence and eyewitness testimony preserved in the Gospels (Luke 23:33-46; John 19:16-37), written between 41 C.E. and 98 C.E., within the lifetimes of many who saw Christ die and rise again (1 Corinthians 15:3-8).
To deny Christ’s crucifixion is to reject the atonement and thus any hope of reconciliation with God (Romans 5:8-11; Hebrews 9:22). Shia Islam, therefore, is not merely another perspective—it is antithetical to salvation.
|
|
|
Political Implications and Religious Authoritarianism
Throughout history, Shia Islam has developed a theocratic model of governance, especially evident in modern Iran, where the Supreme Leader holds both political and religious authority. This blending of mosque and state is not the biblical model of governance. In Scripture, while God appointed leaders (e.g., Moses, David), authority was always subject to divine law and prophetic correction—not centralized in a hidden Imam or authoritarian cleric.
Theocratic rule under Shia Islam has led to oppression, the stifling of dissent, and the persecution of minorities—including Christians. This is not a system inspired by the God of the Bible, who demands justice, truth, and the preservation of His Word.
 |
 |
 |
Evangelistic Implications and the Exclusivity of the Gospel
The exclusivity of Christ as the only way to the Father (John 14:6) eliminates the possibility that Shia Islam, or any other religious system outside of biblical Christianity, can provide salvation. Romans 10:9 clearly states that salvation comes through confessing Jesus as Lord and believing that God raised Him from the dead. Shia Islam rejects both.
Thus, our responsibility is not to find mutual respect in theological discussion but to call Shia Muslims to repentance and faith in the true Messiah, Jesus Christ. Compassion demands clarity, and love demands truth—not the blurring of doctrinal lines.
 |
 |
 |
Final Assessment
Shia Islam, despite its elaborate theology and historical roots, is a system built upon political grievance, speculative doctrine, and theological deviation. It contradicts Scripture on every foundational level—Christology, soteriology, authority, and eschatology. It replaces the once-for-all work of Jesus Christ with an endless cycle of human grief, mystical authority, and ritualism. It is not another path to God; it is a road that leads away from Him.
True hope, true peace, and true forgiveness can be found only in Jesus Christ—the sinless Son of God, the risen Lord, the only mediator, the soon-coming King.
You May Also Enjoy
Islām—The Way to God by Submission?
About the Author
CLICK LINKED IMAGE TO VISIT ONLINE STORE
