The Scriptural Foundation

The book of Kings records the negotiations between King Solomon and King Hiram of Tyre concerning the procurement of cedar and cypress logs from the forests of Lebanon. The narrative specifies the agreement and the method of transport:

“I will do everything you want regarding the cedar and cypress timber. My servants will bring the logs down from Lebanon to the sea, and I will make them into rafts to go by sea to the place you indicate.” (1 Kings 5:8–9)

The parallel account in 2 Chronicles 2:16 provides a nearly identical description: “We will cut trees from Lebanon, as many as you need, and bring them to you as rafts by sea to Joppa. You can then take them up to Jerusalem.” Both texts underscore four key details: the cedars were cut from the mountains of Lebanon, floated by sea, transported in raft form, and then used specifically for temple and palace construction under Solomon.

This places the events in the tenth century B.C.E. during Solomon’s reign (961–922 B.C.E.), just after the united monarchy of Israel had reached its height under David. These passages are historically significant because they place Solomon’s temple-building project within the broader cultural context of the ancient Near East, where the use of Lebanon’s cedar forests was not only prized but essential for monumental construction.

The Historical Context of Cedar Harvesting

The cedars of Lebanon (Cedrus libani) were renowned throughout the ancient world for their height, durability, and resistance to decay. Their straight trunks were ideal for beams, roofing, and decorative paneling. The mountains of Lebanon were one of the few sources in the Levant where such timber could be obtained in large quantities, making them a strategic resource for Egypt, Mesopotamia, and Israel alike.

From the earliest historical records, cedar was viewed as a prized building material. Sumerian texts from the third millennium B.C.E. already describe expeditions to the cedar forests. In the Gilgamesh Epic, the cedar forest is the dwelling of the gods, guarded by Humbaba, which reflects the esteem in which this timber was held. By the second millennium B.C.E., Egyptian, Hittite, and Assyrian records repeatedly describe expeditions, trade missions, or military campaigns to secure timber from Lebanon.

This historical pattern provides a verifiable framework for the biblical account of Solomon importing timber from Hiram. Far from being an isolated practice unique to Israel, it reflects a widespread regional pattern where kings displayed their authority and wealth by securing cedar beams for their most important religious and political constructions.

Egyptian Testimony of Cedar Importation

One of the earliest extra-biblical witnesses to timber importation comes from Egyptian records. The reign of Thutmose III (1479–1425 B.C.E.) produced a stela that lists Lebanon among tributary regions supplying wood to Egypt (COS 2:16–18). This is significant because it corroborates the reality that Lebanon’s cedars were regularly exported southward across centuries, well before the time of Solomon.

Equally compelling is the Egyptian narrative known as “The Report of Wenamun,” dated to the reign of Ramesses XI (c. 1090–1070 B.C.E.). Wenamun was an Egyptian envoy tasked with securing timber for the construction of a sacred barque of Amun. His account describes the difficulty of negotiating with Lebanese rulers and the logistics of harvesting and transporting the wood. He exclaims:

“If I shout aloud to the Lebanon, the sky opens and the logs lie here on the shore of the sea! Give me the sails you brought to move your ships, loaded with logs for [Egypt]! Give me the ropes you brought [to lash the pines] that I am to fell in order to make them for you.” (COS 1:91)

This text shows the practical mechanics of timber acquisition: trees were felled, hauled to the coast, bound with ropes, and then transported by ship or raft to their destination. It mirrors almost exactly the description given in 1 Kings 5, where Hiram’s men were to raft the logs down the coast for Solomon.

Assyrian Records of Cedar Logging

The Assyrian kings repeatedly gloried in their ability to cut cedars from Lebanon and use them for their monumental architecture. These inscriptions, covering several centuries, provide one of the most consistent streams of evidence regarding this practice.

Tiglath-pileser I (1114–1076 B.C.E.) records his conquest of Lebanon and the felling of cedars for temple building (RIMA 2:42–44). This is followed by similar claims in the annals of Ashurnasirpal II (883–859 B.C.E.), who boasts:

“At that time I seized the entire extent of the Lebanon mountain and reached the Great Sea of the Amurru country.… I ascended the mountains of the Amanus and cut down (there) logs of cedar, stonepines, cypresses (and) pines.… The cedar beams from the Amanus mountain I destined/sent for/to the temple Esarra for (the construction of) an iasmaku-sanctuary.” (ANET, 276)

Later Assyrian monarchs—including Adad-nerari III (811–783 B.C.E.), Tiglath-pileser III (744–727 B.C.E.), Sennacherib (704–681 B.C.E.), and Esarhaddon (680–669 B.C.E.)—all continued to describe cutting cedars from Lebanon or Amanus and using them in their palaces and temples (RIMA 2:60, 311–12, 320; RINAP 1:124; 3/2:120; 4:23, 33, 127).

These royal inscriptions provide not only confirmation of the biblical narrative but also archaeological parallels to the practice of rafting logs downriver or across the Mediterranean. They demonstrate that this was the standard method of transport in the ancient world.

Archaeological Depictions of Timber Transport

In addition to inscriptions, visual evidence further corroborates the practice. The palace of Sargon II (721–705 B.C.E.) at Khorsabad yielded a series of wall reliefs now displayed in the Louvre. These reliefs vividly depict the felling, hauling, and transportation of timber. Workers are shown cutting trees, dragging them, and moving them by boat.

Although the reliefs do not explicitly identify Lebanon, the scenes illustrate the same process described in both the Bible and the texts of Egypt and Assyria. They provide material evidence that the imagery in 1 Kings 5 and 2 Chronicles 2 is historically accurate in terms of technique and method.

Babylonian Evidence

The Babylonians, like the Assyrians before them, engaged in cedar harvesting. The Wadi-Brissa Inscription of Nebuchadnezzar II (605–562 B.C.E.) records his operations in Lebanon where he procured timber for temple building (ANET, 307). This demonstrates continuity across empires: Egypt, Assyria, Babylon, and Israel all drew upon the same forests, relying on the same methods of felling, rafting, and transporting cedar logs.

Archaeological and Biblical Convergence

When the biblical account of Solomon’s timber procurement is compared with the Egyptian, Assyrian, and Babylonian evidence, four elements stand out as historically corroborated. First, the source region—the mountains of Lebanon—is consistently mentioned across cultures. Second, the type of timber—cedar—is universally praised as a premium building material. Third, the method of transport—rafting logs to the sea and floating them to their destination—is attested in both inscriptions and reliefs. Fourth, the ultimate purpose—construction of temples and palaces—was the primary motivation across the ancient Near East.

These four elements align precisely with the biblical record. The account in 1 Kings and 2 Chronicles is not an isolated or legendary embellishment but a record fully consistent with ancient practice. The biblical writer describes in straightforward historical terms the same activity that kings across the region engaged in for centuries.

Conclusion

The harvesting and shipment of cedar logs from Lebanon, as described in the reign of Solomon (961–922 B.C.E.), is historically verified by extensive archaeological and textual evidence from surrounding civilizations. Egyptian records, such as the “Report of Wenamun,” demonstrate timber expeditions from Lebanon centuries before Solomon. Assyrian annals repeatedly recount cedar harvesting, while Babylonian inscriptions confirm similar practices. Archaeological reliefs provide visual representation of the very techniques described in the biblical text.

Far from being a unique or questionable detail, the account in 1 Kings 5 and 2 Chronicles 2 reflects the established and well-documented practices of the ancient Near East. The cedar forests of Lebanon were the prized source of monumental timber, and the methods of felling, rafting, and transporting wood match precisely the biblical account of Hiram’s supply for Solomon’s temple. The Bible once again demonstrates historical accuracy, aligning seamlessly with external evidence.

You May Also Enjoy

The Capture and Exile of the Egyptian City of Thebes by the Assyrians

See more

About the Author

CLICK LINKED IMAGE TO VISIT ONLINE STORE

CLICK TO SCROLL THROUGH OUR BOOKS