Site icon Updated American Standard Version

The Question of Man’s Free Will

cropped-uasv-2005.jpg

Please Support the Bible Translation Work of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV)

$5.00

Click here to purchase.

The issue of human free will strikes at the core of theological inquiry, moral accountability, and the relationship between divine sovereignty and human responsibility. Scripture consistently presents man as a free moral agent, capable of choosing between obedience and rebellion, righteousness and sin, life and death. This capacity for choice is not only evident in the account of Adam and Eve but also forms the foundation of moral exhortation throughout the Bible. Contrary to deterministic systems such as strict Calvinism, and far removed from modern secular fatalism, the biblical view affirms both God’s sovereign foreknowledge and man’s responsibility to choose rightly. This freedom is real and consequential, though exercised within the framework of divine sovereignty and justice.

Adam’s Freedom and Fall: The Pattern of Human Agency

When Jehovah God declared His creation “very good” (Genesis 1:31), this included man and woman—Adam and Eve—created in His image (Genesis 1:27). This did not mean they were robotic or incapable of wrongdoing. Rather, they were morally perfect yet endowed with freedom—the ability to choose obedience to God or to reject it. This moral liberty is essential to genuine love and obedience. Jehovah did not desire mechanical compliance, but rather willing devotion, as demonstrated by the repeated exhortations in Scripture to “love Jehovah your God” and to “choose life” (Deuteronomy 30:19–20).

The first human pair sinned not because they were flawed, but because they allowed wrong desires to grow unchecked. As James 1:14–15 explains, “Each one is tried by being drawn out and enticed by his own desire. Then the desire, when it has become fertile, gives birth to sin.” Eve, enticed by Satan’s deception (Genesis 3:1–6), entertained a selfish longing. Adam, not deceived (1 Timothy 2:14), willfully followed her into rebellion. Their sin was a free choice, not a divine imposition, and it brought corruption into the human experience—but did not eliminate the capacity for free moral decision-making in their descendants.

Human Freedom and Jehovah’s Sovereignty

Man’s free will is not absolute in the sense of being independent of all influence, but it is genuine within the context of Jehovah’s governance. God permits humans to make real choices and holds them accountable for those decisions. Passages such as Joshua 24:15 (“Choose this day whom you will serve”) and Isaiah 1:18–20 (“If you are willing and obedient…”) affirm that Jehovah extends genuine invitations with real consequences.

This freedom is not compromised by divine foreknowledge. Jehovah knows all that will happen without dictating every human decision. His foreknowledge is like seeing a ship’s destination, even while the passengers freely move about. He knows the outcome, but the choices remain real. As Proverbs 15:3 says, “The eyes of Jehovah are in every place, keeping watch on the evil and the good.” This knowledge does not negate moral freedom but rather upholds divine justice—Jehovah judges not by predetermined decree but according to individual deeds (Romans 2:6).

Foreknowledge and Molinism: A Balanced View

The framework of Molinism provides a biblically consistent and philosophically coherent explanation of how divine foreknowledge and human freedom coexist. By distinguishing three aspects of God’s knowledge—natural, middle, and free—Molinism explains that God knows all logical possibilities (natural knowledge), all potential decisions of free creatures in hypothetical circumstances (middle knowledge), and all actual events based on His sovereign decision to create this particular world (free knowledge).

For example, Matthew 11:21 records Jesus saying, “If the mighty works done in you had been done in Tyre and Sidon, they would have repented long ago.” This reveals God’s knowledge not only of what did happen, but of what would have happened under different conditions. Such statements support the idea of counterfactual knowledge, which Molinism identifies as part of God’s middle knowledge. This harmonizes with His sovereign role in guiding history and His respect for human freedom.

Through this lens, God’s foreknowledge is not causal. It does not mean He forces choices but knows what choices free agents would make under every conceivable situation. Thus, He governs history not by removing human choice but by wisely incorporating it into His redemptive plan.

Rejecting Fatalism and Divine Determinism

The Bible soundly rejects fatalism—the idea that all events are predetermined and unchangeable regardless of human action. It also rebukes deterministic theologies that present God as the sole causal agent behind every human decision. Such views reduce moral accountability and distort God’s character, making Him the author of evil, which Scripture explicitly denies (James 1:13; Deuteronomy 32:4). Jehovah “is righteous in all His ways” (Psalm 145:17) and has no fellowship with wrongdoing.

When bad things occur, they often result from human sin or the imperfection of the current world. God permits these events within the bounds of free will, but He does not cause them. James 1:13 clarifies, “When under trial, let no one say: ‘I am being tried by God.’” Human desires, not divine manipulation, lead to sin and death (James 1:14–15). Likewise, Jehovah’s justice ensures that each person is judged for their own actions, not for divine decrees they could never have resisted (Ezekiel 18:20, 30).

God’s Role in Trials: Not the Instigator of Evil

While Jehovah allows hardships in a fallen world, He does not test His people with evil. James 1:13–14 and Lamentations 3:38 both emphasize that God neither causes nor delights in evil. Many misinterpret life’s difficulties as divine tests, but Scripture teaches that God strengthens and supports through trials; He does not orchestrate them. Trials arise from living in a broken world populated by free but flawed humans. God, however, is a refuge for those who seek Him (Psalm 46:1), offering His Spirit and Word to guide believers through life’s challenges (James 1:5; 2 Timothy 3:16–17).

Conclusion: A Holy God and Free Humans

The biblical portrayal of Jehovah is of a righteous, loving Creator who grants humans real moral agency. He created Adam and Eve perfect, yet free, and He continues to extend to all their descendants the ability to choose life or death, obedience or sin. His foreknowledge does not coerce decisions but incorporates them into His plan. Molinism provides one helpful model to understand this interaction without compromising either divine sovereignty or human responsibility.

Trials, temptations, and suffering stem not from Jehovah’s will but from human misuse of freedom, inherited imperfection, and a fallen world. Yet through His Spirit and His Word, He equips His people to overcome and endure—not because He sends evil, but because He delivers from it (2 Peter 2:9). Ultimately, the Scriptures affirm a theology of responsibility: “The soul who sins shall die” (Ezekiel 18:4), and “Whoever believes in Him shall not perish” (John 3:16). These are invitations, not inevitabilities—offered freely to creatures made in His image, bearing the profound dignity of choice.

You May Also Benefit From

Was the Bible Writer Luke an Accurate Historian?

About the Author

EDWARD D. ANDREWS (AS in Criminal Justice, BS in Religion, MA in Biblical Studies, and MDiv in Theology) is CEO and President of Christian Publishing House. He has authored over 220+ books. In addition, Andrews is the Chief Translator of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV).

Exit mobile version