Biblical archaeology is not the study of religious dogma or mystical symbolism, but the scientific and historical investigation of physical remnants left behind by ancient peoples described in the Bible. Its role is not to “prove” the Bible—as though the Word of God needed validation—but to clarify, illustrate, and in many cases, corroborate the biblical record with material evidence. From the conservative evangelical standpoint, Scripture is the ultimate authority and is fully trustworthy in all matters it addresses—whether spiritual, moral, or historical.
Despite frequent opposition from liberal theologians and critical scholars who deny or minimize the Bible’s historical accuracy, archaeology has repeatedly confirmed the Bible’s precision in naming cities, peoples, practices, and events long doubted or dismissed by critics. With over 25,000 archaeological sites related directly or indirectly to the biblical world, the field of archaeology has become a powerful witness to the reliability of the Bible. Each new discovery—whether a piece of pottery or an inscription on stone—adds further clarity to the historical background of the biblical narrative.
This article will examine the major categories of archaeological evidence that have confirmed the Bible, focusing on the patriarchal period, the exodus and conquest, the united and divided monarchies, exile and return, and the New Testament period.
The Patriarchs: Historical Realities in Genesis
For years, critics claimed that the accounts of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob in Genesis were largely fictional, reflective of later Jewish folklore. However, archaeological findings from the early second millennium B.C.E.—the period corresponding to the lives of the patriarchs (c. 2000–1600 B.C.E.)—have substantiated key cultural details in Genesis.
Nuzi Tablets—Ancient Insights on Genesis
The Nuzi Tablets, discovered near Kirkuk (ancient Nuzi) in northern Mesopotamia, contain social customs and legal practices strikingly similar to those described in Genesis. For example, they speak of adoption for inheritance purposes (cf. Genesis 15:2–3), the use of handmaids for producing heirs (cf. Genesis 16:1–4), and the transfer of birthrights and blessings (cf. Genesis 25:29–34). These parallels confirm that the Genesis account reflects authentic social customs of the time.
Additionally, the names of cities such as Ur, Haran, Shechem, and Hebron, mentioned in the patriarchal narratives, are known from ancient texts and excavations. The biblical mention of Chedorlaomer, king of Elam (Genesis 14), once considered an invented figure, has now been recognized as a historically plausible name matching Elamite linguistic patterns.
The Exodus and Conquest: History Rooted in Deliverance
While the exodus from Egypt (c. 1446 B.C.E.) remains a contested issue among secular scholars, there is no compelling archaeological evidence to dismiss the biblical narrative. On the contrary, multiple strands of data align with the historical plausibility of Israel’s deliverance from Egypt and entry into Canaan.
Ancient Egyptian texts such as the Merneptah Stele (dated to c. 1208 B.C.E.) provide the earliest extrabiblical reference to “Israel” in the land of Canaan. The inscription reads: “Israel is laid waste; his seed is not.” This demonstrates that by the end of the 13th century B.C.E., Israel was already a recognizable people group in Canaan, consistent with the biblical timeline that places their entrance into the land by 1406 B.C.E. (Joshua 4:19).
The Merneptah Stele is an important historical artifact dating back to ancient Egypt, which is most famous for its inscription that mentions Israel. This stele was discovered in 1896 by the British archaeologist Sir Flinders Petrie at Thebes, and dates back to the reign of the Pharaoh Merneptah (c. 1213-1203 BCE). The inscriptions on the Merneptah Stele describe the military campaigns of Merneptah in the Levant, including specific mentions of various Semitic peoples, such as the Canaanites, the Amorites, and the Israelites. This inscription is unique because it provides one of the earliest-known references to the people of Israel outside of the biblical accounts. There has been much scholarly debate regarding the meaning and significance of the Merneptah Stele, with some claiming that the reference to Israel is evidence of the existence of a distinct, identifiable group of people by that name in the late 13th century BCE. Others argue that the mention of Israel on the stele may refer to a more general region or confederation of tribes rather than a single nation-state. Regardless of its true meaning, the Merneptah Stele remains an important historical artifact, providing a glimpse into the political and military history of the ancient Near East and serving as a key point of reference for academic debates concerning the origins of ancient Israel.
Excavations at Jericho, Hazor, and Ai have produced data suggestive of destruction layers consistent with the Israelite conquest under Joshua. At Jericho, British archaeologist John Garstang, working in the 1930s, found collapsed walls dated to the Late Bronze Age that aligned closely with the biblical account of the city’s miraculous downfall (Joshua 6). Though Kathleen Kenyon’s later redating of the site cast doubt, more recent reevaluations support Garstang’s conclusions. The destruction of Hazor, described in Joshua 11:10–13, is archaeologically attested to by massive burn layers dated to the late 15th century B.C.E., again aligning with the biblical timeline.
The United Monarchy: David and Solomon in History
For decades, secular archaeologists considered David and Solomon mythical figures due to a lack of inscriptions. This changed dramatically with the 1993 discovery of the Tel Dan Stele in northern Israel. This Aramaic inscription, dated to the 9th century B.C.E., references the “House of David,” providing the earliest extrabiblical mention of King David and confirming the existence of his dynasty.
Further confirmation comes from Jerusalem excavations revealing monumental structures and administrative buildings that reflect centralized governance during the 10th century B.C.E.—the period of Solomon’s reign (c. 970–930 B.C.E.). Inscriptions such as the Mesha Stele (Moabite Stone), dated to c. 840 B.C.E., refer to the “House of Omri,” Ahab’s father and founder of a royal dynasty in Israel, validating the biblical mention of these kings (1 Kings 16:16–28).
At Tel Gezer, archaeologists have uncovered the remains of a huge, six-chambered gate complex, dating to Solomon’s time,
At Hazor, Megiddo, and Gezer, large six-chambered gates and casemate walls have been unearthed. These constructions match the cities the Bible attributes to Solomon in 1 Kings 9:15. Though some archaeologists have proposed a later date for these gates (assigning them to Ahab), the traditional dating aligns with biblical chronology and the known territorial control of Solomon’s kingdom.
The Divided Kingdom and Assyrian Invasions
After the division of the kingdom in 931 B.C.E., both Israel and Judah faced the growing threat of Assyrian expansion. The Assyrian royal inscriptions and reliefs confirm the accuracy of numerous biblical accounts.
Jehu bows before Shalmaneser III.
The Black Obelisk of Shalmaneser III (dated to c. 841 B.C.E.) contains an image of King Jehu of Israel bowing before the Assyrian monarch. The inscription reads: “The tribute of Jehu, the son of Omri.” This confirms the Bible’s account of Jehu’s reign (2 Kings 9–10) and shows that he paid tribute to Assyria during his rule.
The Black Obelisk of Shalmaneser III, 9th century BC, from Nimrud, Iraq. The British Museum.
Sennacherib’s campaign against Judah (2 Kings 18–19) is also confirmed by the annals found in Nineveh. His prism records, “As for Hezekiah the Jew, who did not submit to my yoke… I shut him up like a caged bird in his royal city of Jerusalem.” Notably, while boasting of capturing 46 fortified cities of Judah, Sennacherib does not claim to have taken Jerusalem, exactly as recorded in the biblical account where Jehovah miraculously intervenes (2 Kings 19:35–36).
Judean captives being led away into slavery by the Assyrians after the siege of Lachish in 701 B.C.
Lachish, the second-most important city in Judah, was destroyed by Sennacherib’s army in 701 B.C.E. The destruction layer found at Tel Lachish and the Lachish reliefs from Sennacherib’s palace (showing the siege and conquest) directly align with 2 Kings 18:13–14.
The Babylonian Exile and Return
The Babylonian conquest of Jerusalem in 587 B.C.E. and the subsequent exile of the Jews is one of the most well-documented periods in biblical history. Excavations in Jerusalem have uncovered burn layers, ash deposits, and collapsed buildings from the destruction caused by Nebuchadnezzar, confirming the account in 2 Kings 25.
The Babylonian Chronicles are a series of clay tablets inscribed with Babylonian history. They were written at different times, beginning around the sixth century BC. They narrate events beginning in the eighth century BC and cover nearly 500 years of history. Some describe events of biblical history—including Jehoiakim’s refusal to pay tribute (2 Kgs 24:1), Nebuchadnezzar’s siege of Jerusalem (2 Kgs 24:10–11), and Jehoiachin’s capture (2 Kgs 24:12).
The Babylonian Chronicles—cuneiform tablets from Babylon—record Nebuchadnezzar’s campaign against Jerusalem, verifying the events of 597 B.C.E. and 587 B.C.E. from the Babylonian perspective. These tablets, along with the Lachish Letters (ostraca found at Lachish), provide firsthand accounts of the deteriorating political situation in Judah just before the fall of Jerusalem.
The Lachish Ostraca
After the fall of Babylon to Cyrus the Great in 539 B.C.E., the Bible records that the Jews were allowed to return under decree (Ezra 1:1–4). The Cyrus Cylinder, a Persian artifact now in the British Museum, echoes this policy of permitting exiled peoples to return and rebuild their temples, again confirming the biblical record.
The New Testament Era: Historical Anchors in the Roman World
The New Testament is also replete with historical details that have been repeatedly verified through archaeology. Luke, the author of the Gospel of Luke and Acts, has been shown to be remarkably precise in his use of political titles and geographic references.
For example, in Acts 18:12, Luke refers to “Gallio the proconsul of Achaia.” A Latin inscription from Delphi, dated to 51 C.E., mentions Gallio and confirms both his title and his timeframe, aligning with Paul’s missionary activity.
Gallio, Proconsul of Achaia
Pontius Pilate, the Roman prefect who authorized the crucifixion of Jesus (Matthew 27:11–26), was once doubted due to lack of evidence. In 1961, a limestone block was found in Caesarea Maritima bearing an inscription referring to “Pontius Pilatus, Prefect of Judea.” This discovery solidified Pilate’s historical existence and official position.
Inscription Bearing the Name Pontius Pilate
Excavations in Jerusalem have also uncovered the Pool of Bethesda (John 5:2) and the Pool of Siloam (John 9:7), both of which were once considered fictional. These sites have now been identified with archaeological precision.
Coins, inscriptions, and administrative documents continue to corroborate the life setting of the New Testament: names like Herod, Caesar Augustus, Tiberius, and Felix—all accurately portrayed in Scripture—have been verified through archaeological evidence.
Conclusion: Archaeology’s Ongoing Testimony to the Scriptures
The cumulative archaeological evidence overwhelmingly supports the Bible’s reliability as a historical document. No archaeological discovery has ever definitively contradicted a statement in Scripture when interpreted properly with an understanding of ancient culture, geography, and language. On the contrary, the spade continues to uncover confirmation after confirmation of the biblical record.
From Abraham’s journeys to the reign of Solomon, from Hezekiah’s reforms to the rebuilding of Jerusalem after the exile, and from the ministry of Jesus to Paul’s missionary travels, archaeology has played a key role in affirming the accuracy, trustworthiness, and authenticity of God’s Word.
The Bible is not a book of myths—it is a book grounded in real events, real people, and real places. Archaeology, when approached without anti-biblical bias, continues to confirm that the Scriptures reflect not only theological truth but historical reality.
EDWARD D. ANDREWS (AS in Criminal Justice, BS in Religion, MA in Biblical Studies, and MDiv in Theology) is CEO and President of Christian Publishing House. He has authored over 220+ books. In addition, Andrews is the Chief Translator of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV).
SCROLL THROUGH THE DIFFERENT CATEGORIES BELOW
BIBLE TRANSLATION AND TEXTUAL CRITICISM
BIBLICAL STUDIES / BIBLE BACKGROUND / HISTORY OF THE BIBLE/ INTERPRETATION
