In Romans 6, Paul delivers a powerful argument about the transformative effect of a believer’s union with Christ, culminating in the concise yet profound statement of Romans 6:7: “for he who has died is freed from sin,” as rendered in the Updated American Standard Version (UASV). At the heart of this verse lies the Greek verb δεδικαίωται (dedikaiōtai), a term rooted in the language of justification but here applied to convey liberation from sin’s dominion. The UASV’s choice of “freed,” supported by its footnote offering “justified, acquitted” as alternatives, reflects a careful balance of linguistic precision and contextual accuracy. Yet, translating δεδικαίωται poses a challenge, as some translations opt for “set free” or revert to “justified,” risking a shift in Paul’s intended emphasis. This article explores the translation issue of δεδικαίωται in Romans 6:7, demonstrating why “freed” best captures Paul’s meaning while preserving the Greek’s forensic nuance.
The Translation Challenge of Δεδικαίωται
The Greek verb δεδικαίωται, a perfect passive form of δικαιόω (to justify, declare righteous, acquit), typically carries a forensic sense in Paul’s writings, denoting a legal declaration of righteousness before God, as seen in Romans 3:24 or 5:1. Its root, δίκαιος (righteous, just), evokes a courtroom context where one is cleared of guilt. In Romans 6:7, however, δεδικαίωται appears in an unusual setting, where Paul discusses freedom from sin’s power through death. The perfect tense indicates a completed action with ongoing effect: the one who has died remains released from sin’s claim. The preposition ἀπὸ (“from”) with τῆς ἁμαρτίας (“sin”) further suggests separation or liberation, pointing to a translation like “freed” or “acquitted” rather than the strictly legal “justified.”
The challenge lies in capturing δεδικαίωται’s primary meaning—“has been justified” or “has been acquitted”—while reflecting its contextual application in Romans 6:7, where Paul emphasizes that death (literal or through union with Christ) severs sin’s dominion. The UASV’s rendering of “freed” achieves this, aligning with the chapter’s liberation theme while retaining the forensic undertone of acquittal, as noted in the footnote: “Or has been justified, acquitted.” Other translations, however, vary: “set free” risks losing the legal nuance, and “justified” overemphasizes the courtroom sense, potentially misaligning with Paul’s focus on practical freedom. A literal translation must balance these aspects, ensuring Paul’s argument remains clear without introducing artificial complexity.
Contextual Role in Romans 6
Romans 6:1–14 addresses whether believers should continue in sin, given grace’s abundance (6:1). Paul counters that those baptized into Christ’s death (6:3–4) have died to sin (6:2) and are no longer enslaved to it (6:14). Verse 6:7 serves as a succinct rationale: “for he who has died is freed from sin,” explaining how death—whether literal or through identification with Christ—releases one from sin’s penalty and power. The context emphasizes liberation, as seen in later uses of ἐλευθερόω (set free, 6:18, 22), but δεδικαίωται’s forensic root suggests a legal acquittal underlying this freedom: death clears sin’s claim, freeing the individual from its dominion.
This unique use of δεδικαίωται reflects Paul’s deliberate choice to extend its forensic sense to convey liberation, not to create a hybrid meaning. The perfect tense underscores the lasting effect: once acquitted through death, the believer remains free from sin’s control. Translating δεδικαίωται as “freed” captures this contextual emphasis while preserving its legal nuance, avoiding the over-legalistic “justified” that might shift focus to courtroom justification, a theme more prominent in Romans 3–5. The UASV’s footnote acknowledges the term’s root, ensuring readers understand its forensic foundation without overshadowing the liberation focus.
Theological and Cultural Nuances
Theologically, δεδικαίωται in Romans 6:7 bridges Paul’s doctrines of justification (Romans 3–5) and sanctification (Romans 6–8). While justification declares believers righteous, Romans 6 emphasizes practical freedom from sin’s rule through union with Christ’s death. “Freed” conveys this liberation, implying both acquittal (sin’s penalty is nullified) and release (sin’s power is broken), aligning with the Greco-Roman metaphor of death freeing a slave from a master (6:16–18). “Justified,” as in the American Standard Version (ASV), risks overemphasizing legal status, potentially confusing readers about Paul’s focus on lived freedom. “Set free,” while clear, lacks the forensic depth of δεδικαίωται, sounding more dynamic than the Greek warrants.
Culturally, Paul’s audience would have understood acquittal and liberation in legal and social terms. In Roman law, death could absolve debts or obligations, a concept Paul leverages to depict death’s release from sin. “Freed” resonates with this, while “justified” evokes a courtroom not central here. Modern readers, however, may find “freed” less technical than “justified,” prompting dynamic renderings like “set free” for clarity. Yet, δεδικαίωται’s nuance requires a translation that retains its legal root and contextual freedom, which “freed” achieves with precision.
Comparing Translations
The UASV’s “freed” stands out as a highly literal yet contextually accurate rendering, capturing δεδικαίωται’s forensic acquittal and practical liberation. The footnote (“Or has been justified, acquitted”) transparently acknowledges the term’s legal root, ensuring readers grasp its nuance. The New American Standard Bible (NASB), Lexham English Bible (LEB), and Christian Standard Bible (CSB) also use “freed,” aligning with Paul’s emphasis on release from sin’s dominion while preserving the Greek’s subtlety. These translations maintain the balance needed for Romans 6:7’s argument.
The English Standard Version (ESV), New International Version (NIV), New Living Translation (NLT), and Good News Translation (GNT) opt for “set free,” a clear rendering that conveys liberation but is slightly less precise. The phrase echoes ἐλευθερόω (set free, used in 6:18) rather than δεδικαίωται’s forensic nuance, potentially softening the acquittal aspect. While effective, “set free” feels dynamic, prioritizing accessibility over the Greek’s layered meaning. The ASV’s “justified” adheres to δικαιόω’s typical forensic sense but misaligns with Romans 6’s focus on freedom, risking confusion by emphasizing legal righteousness over practical release.
Grammatical and Textual Considerations
Grammatically, δεδικαίωται’s perfect passive form (“has been justified/freed”) indicates a completed act (death) with ongoing results (freedom from sin). The preposition ἀπὸ (“from”) reinforces separation, supporting “freed” as a translation that reflects both acquittal and release. The context—union with Christ’s death (6:3–6)—shapes δεδικαίωται’s application, making “freed” more fitting than “justified,” which Paul uses elsewhere for divine declaration (e.g., 5:1). The Historical-Grammatical approach demands fidelity to this context, avoiding artificial blends of meaning. Paul employs δεδικαίωται to convey acquittal from sin’s claim, resulting in freedom, not a new hybrid category.
The UASV’s footnote clarifies this by offering “justified, acquitted” as alternatives, grounding “freed” in δεδικαίωται’s forensic root while prioritizing contextual accuracy. This transparency ensures readers understand the term’s legal foundation without imposing a courtroom focus on Romans 6:7. The challenge for translators lies in balancing δεδικαίωται’s inherent meaning with its unique application, a task “freed” accomplishes effectively.
Why Accurate Translation Matters
The translation of δεδικαίωται in Romans 6:7 shapes how readers understand Paul’s theology of freedom from sin. “Freed,” as in the UASV, NASB, LEB, and CSB, accurately reflects the Greek’s forensic acquittal and contextual liberation, ensuring Paul’s argument about death’s release from sin’s dominion remains clear. “Set free” (ESV, NIV, NLT, GNT) conveys freedom but loses some nuance, while “justified” (ASV) misaligns with the chapter’s focus, emphasizing legal status over practical release. The Historical-Grammatical approach requires a rendering that honors δεδικαίωται’s primary meaning (“justified/acquitted”) while capturing its application (“freed”), avoiding subjective interpretations that blend categories.
By choosing “freed,” the UASV preserves Paul’s intent, clarifying that believers, through death with Christ, are acquitted from sin’s penalty and power. This precision counters potential biases—such as overemphasizing justification or softening liberation—that could obscure Romans 6’s transformative message. A literal translation ensures readers grasp the profound freedom Jehovah offers, rooted in the decisive act of Christ’s death.
Hearing the Criticism of the UASV’s Rendering
The critic raises several points against the UASV’s rendering of δεδικαίωται as “freed” in Romans 6:7:
Lexical Argument: Δικαιόω (G1344) “never means ‘freed’” but always denotes “justified” (declare righteous, acquit). Early translations (405 Vulgate, 1395 Wycliffe, 1534 Tyndale, 1535–1541 Great Bible, 1545 Luther, 1568 Bishops) unanimously used “justified” or equivalents (e.g., “made righteous”), while “freed” emerged later with the 1587 Geneva Bible and KJV, marking an error.
Inconsistency in Translations: Translations rendering δικαιόω as “freed” in Romans 6:7 (e.g., UASV, NASB, ESV, NIV) consistently use “justified” elsewhere in the New Testament, suggesting “freed” is an inconsistent, erroneous interpretation rather than a translation.
Theological Impact: By using “freed” instead of “justified,” the UASV and others undermine the doctrine of justification by grace alone through faith alone. The critic claims ἐλευθερόω (“set free,” 6:18, 22) depends on δικαιόω’s “justified” in 6:7 as its theological basis, and “freed” weakens this foundation.
Historical Pattern of Error: The 1885 Revised Version and 1901 ASV corrected the KJV’s “freed” to “justified,” but the 1977 NASB, 1995 NASB, 2020 NASB, and UASV reverted to “freed.” The 2021 Legacy Standard Bible (LSB) is praised for restoring “justified.” Scholars are dismissed as untrustworthy, with an appeal to the argumentum ad baculum (fallacy of authority) and an unrelated Bach scholarship error as evidence.
Divine Providence: The critic frames “freed” as a divinely ordained “mistranslation,” noting the irony that the Jehovah’s Witnesses’ New World Translation (NWT) correctly uses “acquitted,” proving God’s impartiality (Acts 10:34).
Translation vs. Interpretation: “Freed” is labeled an interpretation, not a translation, which reputable translators should avoid, as interpretation belongs to preachers.
Evaluation and Refutation
Using the Historical-Grammatical method, which prioritizes the Greek text’s grammar, context, and authorial intent, I’ll evaluate each point and refute where the critic is incorrect.
Lexical Argument: The claim that δικαιόω “never means ‘freed’” is overly restrictive. While δικαιόω primarily means “to justify, declare righteous, acquit” (e.g., Romans 3:24), its semantic range, as noted in BDAG, includes “set free” or “clear from charge” in contexts with ἀπό (e.g., Acts 13:39). In Romans 6:7, δεδικαίωται with ἀπὸ τῆς ἁμαρτίας (“from sin”) conveys acquittal leading to liberation from sin’s dominion, supported by the perfect tense’s lasting effect. Early translations’ use of “justified” reflects δικαιόω’s forensic sense but doesn’t negate contextual nuance. Refutation: Δικαιόω can mean “freed” in Romans 6:7’s context, where ἀπὸ and the liberation theme (6:6–14) emphasize release from sin’s power. “Freed” is a legitimate translation, not an error, as it captures δεδικαίωται’s forensic acquittal applied to freedom, aligning with the Historical-Grammatical method.
Inconsistency in Translations: The critic’s point about translations rendering δικαιόω as “justified” elsewhere is valid but misapplied. Consistency is secondary to context; words take meaning from their use (e.g., πίστις as “faith” or “faithfulness”). Romans 6:7’s focus on liberation (ἐλευθερόω in 6:18) justifies “freed,” and the UASV’s footnote (“Or has been justified, acquitted”) addresses δικαιόω’s root, mitigating inconsistency claims. Refutation: The UASV’s “freed” responds to Romans 6:7’s context, not inconsistency. The Historical-Grammatical method prioritizes contextual accuracy over uniform rendering, making “freed” a faithful translation supported by ἀπὸ and Paul’s argument.
Theological Impact: The claim that “freed” undermines justification by grace is unfounded. Romans 6:7 addresses freedom from sin’s dominion through Christ’s death (6:3–6), not justification’s basis (Romans 3–5). Ἐλευθερόω in 6:18, 22 builds on δεδικαίωται’s acquittal, not a prior “justified” rendering, as the critic assumes. “Freed” supports justification’s outcome—release from sin—without negating grace.
Refutation: “Freed” aligns with Romans 6’s sanctification theme, complementing justification by grace. The critic’s concern imposes a justification-centric lens on a liberation-focused text, misreading Paul’s theology.
Historical Pattern of Error: The critic’s history of translations is selective. Early versions (e.g., Vulgate) used “justified” due to δικαιόω’s forensic sense, but later translations (Geneva, KJV) adopted “freed” as scholarship recognized Romans 6:7’s context. The ASV’s “justified” and LSB’s return to it reflect a preference for δικαιόω’s typical meaning, not a correction of error. The Bach analogy is irrelevant, and dismissing scholars as untrustworthy ignores textual evidence.
Refutation: The UASV’s “freed” is grounded in Greek exegesis (ἀπὸ, context), not scholarly error. The Historical-Grammatical method values evidence over historical trends, and “freed” reflects Paul’s intent more accurately than “justified” in this verse.
Divine Providence: The critic’s appeal to divine providence is a theological assertion, not a textual argument. The NWT’s “acquitted” is accurate, but so is “freed,” as both reflect δεδικαίωται’s nuance. This point doesn’t undermine the UASV. Refutation: The UASV’s “freed” is a valid translation, like the NWT’s “acquitted,” both supported by the Greek. Divine providence is irrelevant to textual analysis, which the Historical-Grammatical method governs.
Translation vs. Interpretation: The critic’s claim that “freed” is interpretation assumes “justified” is the only literal rendering. Translation involves contextual judgment within a word’s semantic range, and “freed” is a translation, not a gloss, as BDAG and ἀπὸ’s use confirm. The UASV’s footnote ensures transparency. Refutation: “Freed” is a scholarly translation, not interpretation, reflecting δεδικαίωται’s contextual meaning. The critic’s insistence on “justified” ignores the Historical-Grammatical method’s emphasis on context.
Addressing Criticism of the UASV’s Rendering
Critics of the UASV’s translation of δεδικαίωται as “freed” in Romans 6:7 argue it’s a grave error, claiming δικαιόω (to justify, acquit) never means “freed” and that “justified” is correct, as seen in early translations (e.g., Vulgate, Tyndale). They assert “freed” is inconsistent, as δικαιόω is elsewhere “justified,” undermines justification by grace, and reflects interpretive bias rather than translation, ordained by divine providence yet ironically correct in the Jehovah’s Witnesses’ “acquitted.”
These criticisms misapply the Historical-Grammatical method. While δικαιόω primarily means “justify/acquit,” its use with ἀπὸ τῆς ἁμαρτίας (“from sin”) in Romans 6:7’s context—freedom from sin’s dominion (6:6–14)—conveys liberation, as lexicons (BDAG) confirm. “Freed” is a contextually accurate translation, capturing acquittal’s outcome, supported by the UASV’s footnote (“Or has been justified, acquitted”). Early translations’ “justified” reflects δικαιόω’s forensic sense but misses Romans 6’s liberation focus. “Freed” aligns with Paul’s argument, complementing justification (Romans 3–5) without undermining it, as ἐλευθερόω (“set free,” 6:18) builds on δεδικαίωται’s release, not a prior “justified.” Scholarly choices, grounded in Greek exegesis, refute claims of error, and divine providence is irrelevant to textual analysis. The UASV’s “freed” is a faithful translation, not interpretation, ensuring Paul’s theology of freedom shines through.
EDWARD D. ANDREWS (AS in Criminal Justice, BS in Religion, MA in Biblical Studies, and MDiv in Theology) is CEO and President of Christian Publishing House. He has authored over 220+ books. In addition, Andrews is the Chief Translator of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV).
SCROLL THROUGH THE DIFFERENT CATEGORIES BELOW
BIBLE TRANSLATION AND TEXTUAL CRITICISM
BIBLICAL STUDIES / BIBLE BACKGROUND / HISTORY OF THE BIBLE/ INTERPRETATION
