
Please Support the Bible Translation Work of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV)
$5.00
Introduction to Papyrus 70
Papyrus 70 (P70) is an early papyrus manuscript of the New Testament, containing portions of the Gospel of Matthew. It was discovered at Oxyrhynchus, Egypt, a significant archaeological site for early Christian manuscripts. The manuscript, dated to the late third century C.E., provides key insights into the transmission of Matthew’s Gospel and reflects the textual traditions of the Alexandrian text-type. P70 consists of two fragmented leaves that preserve portions of Matthew 2:13–16; 2:22–3:1; 11:26–27; 12:4–5; and 24:3–6, 12–15. These passages cover important theological and eschatological narratives, including the flight to Egypt, Jesus’ teaching on humility, the disciples plucking grain, and prophecies concerning the end times.
Date of Papyrus 70
Paleographically, P70 has been assigned to the late third century C.E., with some scholars proposing a possible date extending into the early fourth century. This dating is based on a comparative analysis of its script, which is a biblical uncial. E. G. Turner, the editor of the Oxyrhynchus piece, compared P70’s handwriting with that of P. Oxy. 847 (= 0162) and P. Oxy. 1224, placing it firmly within this period. Enrico Bartoletti, examining fragments housed in Florence, also concluded that P70 aligns closely with other third-century manuscripts, such as P. Oxy. 1780 (= P39).
The consistency of these analyses underscores the manuscript’s significance as a representative of the third-century transmission of the New Testament. By this period, the Alexandrian text-type, characterized by its conciseness and textual reliability, was becoming increasingly prominent in textual traditions.
Content of Papyrus 70
The surviving portions of P70 provide an intriguing glimpse into key sections of Matthew’s Gospel. The following texts are preserved:
- Matthew 2:13–16: This passage recounts the flight of Joseph, Mary, and the infant Jesus into Egypt following divine warning about Herod’s intent to kill the child. The narrative fulfills the prophecy, “Out of Egypt I called my son” (Matthew 2:15).
- Matthew 2:22–3:1: These verses detail the return to Israel and the establishment of Jesus’ family in Nazareth, fulfilling another prophecy, “He shall be called a Nazarene.”
- Matthew 11:26–27: This section emphasizes Jesus’ exclusive relationship with the Father and His role as the sole revealer of God’s will.
- Matthew 12:4–5: These verses address Jesus’ defense of His disciples plucking grain on the Sabbath, highlighting His authority over the Law.
- Matthew 24:3–6, 12–15: These eschatological passages describe Jesus’ discourse on the Mount of Olives, addressing the signs of the end of the age and the coming tribulations.
These texts, while fragmentary, contribute significantly to understanding the transmission and theological focus of the Gospel of Matthew in the early centuries of Christianity.
Physical Features of Papyrus 70
P70 consists of two leaves, originally measuring approximately 15 cm by 25 cm, with 28–29 lines per page. The manuscript was written in a biblical uncial hand, a script style commonly used for sacred texts in the third and fourth centuries. The script of P70 exhibits similarities to other Oxyrhynchus papyri, such as P. Oxy. 847 and P. Oxy. 1224, which further corroborates its dating.
The fragments are currently split between two locations. One portion (P. Oxy. 2384) is housed at the Ashmolean Museum in Oxford, England, while the other (PSI Inv. CNR 419, 420) is located at the Istituto Papirologico G. Vitelli in Florence, Italy. This dispersal highlights the complex history of manuscript discoveries and their subsequent cataloging and preservation.
Textual Character of Papyrus 70
P70 is classified as a representative of the Alexandrian text-type, a textual family noted for its conciseness and fidelity to the original autographs. The Alands placed P70 in Category I, signifying a “strict text” with minimal deviation from the presumed original text of Matthew. Despite its textual accuracy, the manuscript is described as “somewhat carelessly written,” reflecting a lack of meticulousness in copying. This carelessness does not significantly detract from its overall textual reliability but is indicative of the challenges faced by scribes in the early transmission of New Testament texts.
The Alexandrian text-type, to which P70 belongs, is often considered the most reliable textual tradition for reconstructing the New Testament. Unlike the Western text-type, which exhibits paraphrastic tendencies and expansions, the Alexandrian tradition is characterized by its brevity and precision. This textual discipline is evident in P70’s preserved sections, which align closely with other early Alexandrian witnesses, such as Codex Vaticanus (B) and Codex Sinaiticus (א).
Broader Textual Contexts and Implications
P70’s affiliation with the Alexandrian text-type provides an opportunity to contrast it with other textual traditions. The Alexandrian tradition, valued for its fidelity to the originals, stands in opposition to the Western text-type’s more interpretive and expansive approach. The Byzantine text-type, which emerged later, represents a harmonized and less critical textual tradition, often incorporating readings from multiple sources to create a unified text.
The Caesarean text-type, though less clearly defined, represents a regional variation that exhibits both Alexandrian and Western influences. P70’s Alexandrian alignment underscores its importance in the broader effort to establish the original text of the New Testament, particularly in light of the Documentary Method, which prioritizes external manuscript evidence over subjective internal criteria.
Methods of Establishing the Originals
The study of P70 highlights the value of the Documentary Method in reconstructing the New Testament text. By emphasizing the external evidence provided by manuscripts like P70, scholars can trace the textual history of the New Testament with greater accuracy. The Alexandrian text-type, as represented by P70, plays a crucial role in this endeavor, offering a reliable witness to the early textual tradition of Matthew’s Gospel.
P70’s inclusion in Category I by the Alands affirms its textual quality and its significance as a witness to the Alexandrian tradition. This classification, combined with its paleographic dating and textual content, makes P70 a valuable resource for understanding the transmission and preservation of the Gospel of Matthew in the third century.
Conclusion
Papyrus 70 is a critical witness to the text of the Gospel of Matthew, reflecting the Alexandrian textual tradition and providing valuable insights into the transmission of the New Testament during the third century C.E. Its fragments, while limited in scope, contribute to the broader understanding of early Christian manuscript culture and the efforts to preserve the teachings of Jesus.
Greek Text by Philip W. Comfort[verso]
|
Translation by Edward D. AndrewsTranslation of Papyrus 70 (P70) [Literal Translation Philosophy]Verso (Matthew 2:13–15, Partial)13 “…the child, to destroy him.” Verso (Matthew 2:22–23, Partial)22 And hearing that Archelaus reigned over Judea Recto (Matthew 11:26–27, Partial)26 “…before you. Recto (Matthew 12:4–5, Partial)4 “…the house of God, and they ate Recto (Matthew 23:39, Partial)39 “…you will not see me from now on Recto (Matthew 24:1–5, Partial)1 And Jesus went out from the temple Verso (Matthew 24:6–15, Partial)6 “And you will hear of wars This translation adheres to a literal philosophy, maintaining fidelity to the Greek structure and phrasing, ensuring a faithful representation of the manuscript’s preserved content.
|
You May Also Enjoy
How Does the Documentary Approach Impact New Testament Textual Criticism?

