The Role of God’s Spirit in Establishing the Canon

One of the key misconceptions that has emerged over time is the belief that the canon of the Bible, particularly the New Testament, was determined by councils or decrees of the Roman Catholic Church. The Council of Carthage, which took place in 397 C.E., is often cited as having determined the canon. However, this viewpoint distorts the historical and spiritual reality. The canon of the Christian Greek Scriptures was not established by a human council, but by the direction of the Holy Spirit.

Jehovah’s Spirit, which inspired the writing of the Scriptures, was also active in confirming which books were genuinely part of the divine canon. As Paul wrote, “All scripture is inspired of God and beneficial for teaching, for reproving, for setting things straight” (2 Timothy 3:16). Thus, the councils only acknowledged what had already been recognized by early Christians, guided by the Holy Spirit. The testimony of later councils or catalogers, while valuable, serves merely as an acknowledgment of what had already been established under divine guidance.

Evidence of this is seen in the early fourth-century catalogs of Christian Scripture. Several lists from this period show complete agreement with our current New Testament, while others omit only Revelation. By the end of the second century, the four Gospels, Acts, and 12 of Paul’s letters were universally accepted. Only a few smaller writings, such as James, Hebrews, and 2 Peter, were questioned in certain regions due to their limited circulation.

This early consensus demonstrates that, long before councils like the one at Carthage, the church had already recognized the divine authority of most of the books we now consider part of the New Testament. The process of canon recognition was a spiritual, rather than purely institutional, development.

The Emergence of Apocryphal Writings

From the second century C.E. onwards, a wide range of writings began to appear, claiming divine inspiration and presenting themselves as part of the Christian faith. These writings, often labeled the “Apocryphal New Testament,” attempted to imitate the canonical Gospels, Acts, letters, and the book of Revelation. However, these works clearly lacked the divine inspiration evident in the New Testament and often contradicted both the teachings and the spirit of the Scriptures.

For instance, some apocryphal works, such as the Infancy Gospel of Thomas and the Protevangelium of James, contain fanciful accounts of Jesus’ childhood, depicting him as a capricious and sometimes petulant child. This directly contrasts with the true biblical portrayal of Jesus as a child, described as obedient and growing in wisdom and favor with God and men (Luke 2:51-52). The apocryphal writings, in contrast, attempt to fill gaps in Jesus’ life that the inspired Scriptures deliberately omit, revealing their inauthenticity.

Similarly, other apocryphal writings, such as the “Acts of Paul” and the “Acts of Peter,” promote doctrines that are not only absent from the canonical New Testament but also in direct contradiction to it. For example, these works emphasize extreme asceticism, with some going so far as to advocate for the separation of married couples, a position that directly contradicts Paul’s inspired counsel in 1 Corinthians 7, where he affirms the sanctity of marriage and urges husbands and wives to fulfill their marital responsibilities.

The Nature of Apocryphal Writings

The so-called Apocryphal New Testament writings were often marked by theatrical and exaggerated narratives, as well as teachings that veered away from apostolic doctrine. As noted in The Interpreter’s Dictionary of the Bible, “Many of them are trivial, some are highly theatrical, some are disgusting, even loathsome.” These writings attempted to introduce unbiblical doctrines and supported traditions that had no foundation in Scripture, which is why they were not accepted by the early church as part of the canon.

Funk and Wagnalls New Standard Bible Dictionary goes even further, stating, “They have been the fruitful source of sacred legends and ecclesiastical traditions. It is to these books that we must look for the origin of some of the dogmas of the Roman Catholic Church.” The creation of these apocryphal texts reveals a desire to introduce teachings that aligned more with certain religious traditions than with the truth of Scripture.

Early Recognition of the Canon

The exclusion of apocryphal writings from the biblical canon was not arbitrary but based on clear distinctions between divinely inspired writings and those of human origin. One of the most important early catalogs of the New Testament books is the Muratorian Fragment, discovered in the 18th century. This fragment dates back to the latter part of the second century C.E. and lists nearly all the books of the New Testament as we know them today.

The Muratorian Fragment acknowledges four Gospels—Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John—as well as the Acts of the Apostles and the letters of Paul. It also refers to the epistles of John and Jude and includes the Revelation of John. This early document reflects the acceptance of these books as canonical well before any formal council. The absence of some books, such as Hebrews and James, does not indicate their rejection but rather reflects regional variations in circulation.

The Influence of Marcion and the Apocrypha

The question of which books should be accepted by Christians did not arise until the middle of the second century, when heretical figures like Marcion began to challenge the canon. Marcion constructed his own canon, accepting only certain letters of Paul and an edited version of Luke’s Gospel that removed references to the Old Testament.

Marcion’s actions, combined with the proliferation of apocryphal writings, prompted early Christian catalogers to clarify which books were truly inspired. This need to distinguish between inspired and uninspired writings led to the formation of clear statements regarding the canon.

Internal Evidence for the Canon

The clear distinction between the inspired books of the New Testament and the apocryphal writings is supported by internal evidence. The Apocryphal New Testament writings are inferior in content, often inaccurate, and at times even childish in their portrayal of events. By contrast, the New Testament books exhibit spiritual depth, doctrinal consistency, and an authentic connection to the apostles who were directly commissioned by Jesus Christ.

As M.R. James observed, “There is no question of any one’s having excluded them [the apocryphal writings] from the New Testament: they have done that for themselves.” The apocryphal writings lack the qualities that distinguish Scripture, which is why they were never included in the New Testament canon.

Similarly, G. Milligan remarked, “We have only to compare our New Testament books as a whole with other literature of the kind to realize how wide is the gulf which separates them from it.” The apocryphal gospels, in particular, serve as evidence for the authenticity of the canonical Gospels by highlighting the stark differences between inspired and uninspired writings.

Apostolic Authority and the Canon

The New Testament writers were closely associated with the original apostles of Jesus Christ, who were personally selected by him. Matthew, John, and Peter were among the 12 apostles, and Paul was later chosen as an apostle to the Gentiles. Although Paul was not present at Pentecost, when the Holy Spirit was poured out on the apostles, he received direct revelation from Jesus and was endowed with miraculous gifts by the Holy Spirit (Acts 9:17-18). Other writers, such as Mark and Luke, were close companions of Peter and Paul, ensuring that their writings were based on apostolic teaching and authority.

Peter’s acknowledgment of Paul’s letters as part of the Scriptures further confirms their divine inspiration. In 2 Peter 3:15-16, Peter writes, “Consider the patience of our Lord as salvation, just as our beloved brother Paul also wrote to you according to the wisdom given him. He speaks about these things in all his letters. Some things in them are hard to understand, which the ignorant and unstable twist to their own destruction, as they also do with the rest of the Scriptures.” This statement places Paul’s writings on the same level as the Hebrew Scriptures, affirming their canonicity.

Do Apocryphal Gospels Reveal Hidden Truths About Jesus?

Canonical and Apocryphal Gospels: A Fundamental Distinction

The canon of Scripture, especially the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, is established as the foundation of the Christian faith. These Gospels were written between 40 and 98 C.E., and they provide “the history of Jesus Christ” (Matthew 1:1). They are called “good news” because they deliver the essential message of salvation through Jesus. Mark’s Gospel begins by stating: “The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God” (Mark 1:1). These four Gospels, guided by the Holy Spirit, are the only ones considered inspired and part of the Holy Scriptures, providing “the certainty of the things” about Jesus’ earthly life and ministry (Luke 1:1-4; Acts 1:1-2; 2 Timothy 3:16-17).

Despite this firm foundation, a number of other writings also appeared over time, labeled as gospels. These apocryphal texts were not part of the inspired Word of God, but rather human creations attempting to mimic the divinely inspired accounts. The term “apocryphal” is derived from a Greek word meaning “to hide away.” Initially, it referred to texts reserved for followers of particular schools of thought, hidden from the uninitiated. However, it eventually came to refer to writings not included in the biblical canon, writings that were recognized as uninspired and spurious.

Irenaeus of Lyon, writing at the end of the second century C.E., commented on the proliferation of these spurious texts, noting that those who had apostatized from Christianity were responsible for producing “an unspeakable number of apocryphal and spurious writings,” including gospels “they themselves have forged, to bewilder the minds of foolish men.” Such writings were not only seen as false but dangerous, misleading people away from the true faith. Irenaeus’ concern underscores the growing recognition that these writings were not merely benign but were actively contributing to apostasy from the true teachings of Christ.

The apocryphal gospels, though initially preserved by medieval monks and copyists, were brought back into the spotlight in the 19th century as scholars sought to uncover and study them. Collections of these texts were published in modern languages, fueling speculation about their supposed revelations. However, a closer examination reveals their shortcomings and their significant departure from the truth presented in the canonical Gospels.

The Apocryphal Gospels and Their Unreliable Accounts of Jesus

The apocryphal gospels frequently focus on figures who receive little attention in the canonical Gospels or describe events not included in the inspired accounts. These stories are often far-fetched, inconsistent, or contradict the reliable historical accounts given by Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John.

One such apocryphal text is the “Proto-Gospel of James,” also known as “The Birth of Mary.” This document purports to tell the story of Mary’s birth, childhood, and marriage to Joseph. However, the text is regarded as religious fiction and legend rather than historical truth. It seeks to promote the idea of Mary’s perpetual virginity, a claim that directly contradicts the clear teaching of Scripture. Matthew 1:24-25 states that Joseph “did not know her intimately until she gave birth to a son,” implying that the marriage was consummated after Jesus’ birth. Moreover, Matthew 13:55-56 lists Jesus’ brothers and sisters, further disproving the claim of Mary’s lifelong virginity.

Another well-known apocryphal text is the “Infancy Gospel of Thomas,” which focuses on Jesus as a child, attributing to him a series of miraculous yet absurd events. According to this gospel, Jesus, between the ages of five and twelve, performed a number of petty and vindictive miracles. In this narrative, Jesus is depicted as an irascible child who uses his miraculous powers to harm those who offend him, including blinding, crippling, or even killing other children. This characterization of Jesus stands in stark contrast to the biblical portrayal of Christ, who was always loving, compassionate, and obedient to his parents (Luke 2:51-52). John 2:11 makes it clear that Jesus’ first miracle took place at the wedding in Cana, and the canonical Gospels consistently show him using his divine powers for righteous and compassionate purposes.

Other apocryphal gospels, such as the “Gospel of Peter” and the “Acts of Pilate,” focus on events related to Jesus’ trial, crucifixion, and resurrection. The “Gospel of Peter” is particularly problematic, as it seeks to exonerate Pontius Pilate and describes Jesus’ resurrection in an overly dramatic and fictitious manner. These embellishments and alterations to the true Gospel accounts reveal the apocryphal writers’ intent to distort and manipulate the truth for their own purposes.

Apocryphal Gospels and the Gnostic Influence

In December 1945, a discovery near Nag Hammadi in Upper Egypt brought to light a collection of 13 papyrus manuscripts containing 52 texts. These documents, dating from the fourth century C.E., are associated with a religious and philosophical movement known as Gnosticism. Gnosticism was a syncretistic belief system that blended elements of mysticism, paganism, Greek philosophy, Judaism, and even Christianity. Gnosticism became a significant threat to the early Christian church, as it introduced teachings that contradicted biblical doctrine and promoted an elitist spiritual knowledge.

Several of the apocryphal gospels discovered at Nag Hammadi, such as the “Gospel of Thomas,” the “Gospel of Philip,” and the “Gospel of Truth,” are saturated with Gnostic ideas. These texts present a distorted view of Jesus, portraying him not as the Savior who came to die for the sins of the world, but rather as a mystical teacher who imparts hidden wisdom to an enlightened few. The Gnostic gospels reject key Christian doctrines, such as Jesus’ atoning sacrifice, and instead emphasize a secret knowledge as the path to salvation.

The “Gospel of Judas,” another Gnostic text discovered and publicized in recent years, portrays Judas Iscariot in a positive light, suggesting that he was the only apostle who truly understood Jesus. According to this gospel, Judas’ betrayal was not a treacherous act but rather a necessary part of Jesus’ plan to transcend the material world. This directly contradicts the inspired accounts, which describe Judas as a thief and traitor (John 12:6; Luke 22:3-6). The inspired Gospels are clear that Jesus willingly offered himself as a sacrifice for the sins of the world (Matthew 20:28; 26:28; 1 John 2:1-2). The Gnostic gospels, by undermining these foundational truths, are revealed as deceptive writings that lead people away from biblical Christianity.

The Canonical Gospels: Authenticated by Apostolic Authority

The canonical Gospels stand in stark contrast to the apocryphal texts. While the apocryphal gospels were written by unknown authors long after the events they purport to describe, the canonical Gospels were written by individuals who had firsthand knowledge of Jesus or were closely associated with the apostles. Matthew and John were among the twelve apostles, and Mark and Luke were close associates of Peter and Paul, respectively. As eyewitnesses or companions of eyewitnesses, these men were uniquely qualified to record accurate and trustworthy accounts of Jesus’ life and teachings.

The canonical Gospels were written under the inspiration of God’s Holy Spirit (2 Timothy 3:14-17). This divine guidance ensured that their accounts were accurate, free from error, and perfectly aligned with the rest of Scripture. Luke, for instance, carefully researched and compiled his Gospel to provide “an orderly account” of the events surrounding Jesus’ life (Luke 1:3). His detailed historical narrative is marked by accuracy and reliability, qualities absent in the apocryphal gospels.

In John 20:31, the apostle John explains the purpose of his Gospel: “These are written so that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that by believing you may have life in his name.” The canonical Gospels provide everything necessary for salvation, teaching the essential truths about Jesus’ identity, his work, and his message of redemption. There is no need to turn to apocryphal texts, which offer only confusion and falsehood.

The Danger of Apostasy in Apocryphal Writings

The proliferation of apocryphal writings coincided with a period of increasing apostasy from the true Christian faith. As early as the first century C.E., the apostle Paul warned that false teachers would arise, seeking to distort the truth and lead believers astray. He wrote: “I know that after my departure fierce wolves will come in among you, not sparing the flock; and from among your own selves men will arise, speaking twisted things, to draw away the disciples after them” (Acts 20:29-30). The apocryphal gospels, many of which were produced by individuals or groups that had abandoned true Christianity, reflect this spirit of apostasy.

Paul also warned Timothy to “guard what has been entrusted to you, turning away from the profane, empty speech that violate what is holy and from the contradictions of the falsely called ‘knowledge'” (1 Timothy 6:20). The Gnostic gospels, with their emphasis on secret knowledge and mysticism, embody the very kind of false teaching that Paul was warning against. These writings were designed to deceive and mislead, offering a counterfeit gospel that detracts from the true message of salvation.

The rise of Gnosticism and the spread of apocryphal writings were part of a broader movement that sought to corrupt the pure teachings of Christ and his apostles. By promoting unbiblical doctrines and fabricating stories about Jesus, these texts contributed to the growing apostasy that Paul and the other apostles had foreseen.

The Canon: Sealed and Complete

The existence of apocryphal writings does not in any way detract from the authenticity and authority of the canonical Gospels. On the contrary, the contrast between the inspired Scriptures and the apocryphal gospels serves to highlight the superiority of the canonical texts. The canon of Scripture, both the Hebrew Scriptures and the Christian Greek Scriptures, was established under the guidance of Jehovah’s Holy Spirit, and it is complete.

The four Gospels—Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John—contain all that is necessary for believers to know and understand Jesus Christ. There is no hidden knowledge to be uncovered, no secret truths that the canonical Gospels fail to reveal. Everything essential for salvation, everything necessary to grow in the knowledge and grace of Jesus Christ, is contained within these inspired writings.

As Paul wrote to Timothy, “All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work” (2 Timothy 3:16-17). The canonical Gospels, along with the rest of Scripture, are sufficient to equip believers for a life of faith and obedience. The apocryphal gospels, by contrast, offer nothing of value in this regard.

While scholars and the media may sensationalize the discovery of apocryphal writings, claiming they reveal hidden truths about Jesus, the reality is far different. These writings were produced by individuals who had departed from the true faith, and they contain numerous errors, fabrications, and contradictions. They do not provide any new or valuable insight into the life of Jesus or the message of Christianity. The canonical Gospels, inspired by the Holy Spirit and written by those who knew Jesus or his apostles, remain the only reliable and authoritative source of knowledge about the Savior.

God’s Guidance in Preserving and Restoring the Canon

Faith in Jehovah, the Inspirer, Preserver, and Restorer of his Word, reassures us that the Bible we possess today is complete and accurate. Jehovah’s Spirit guided the process of canonization, ensuring that the 27 books of the New Testament, along with the 39 books of the Hebrew Scriptures, form one cohesive and harmonious Bible.

As Isaiah 40:8 states, “The grass withers, the flower fades, but the word of our God will stand forever.” Jehovah’s inspired Word is indeed the only guide that can equip us for salvation and lead us on the path of life. Therefore, it is imperative to study the Scriptures diligently, recognizing their divine origin and the role they play in directing us toward the truth.

About the Author

SCROLL THROUGH THE DIFFERENT CATEGORIES BELOW

BIBLE TRANSLATION AND TEXTUAL CRITICISM

BIBLICAL STUDIES / BIBLE BACKGROUND / HISTORY OF THE BIBLE/ INTERPRETATION

EARLY CHRISTIANITY

HISTORY OF CHRISTIANITY

CHRISTIAN APOLOGETIC EVANGELISM

TECHNOLOGY AND THE CHRISTIAN

CHRISTIAN THEOLOGY

CHRISTIAN DEVOTIONALS

CHRISTIAN FICTION